I don\'t see what in the blazes the point of attacking my post was; if you went through and did that to everyone\'s posts, you\'d turn this whole thread into a huge, pointless debate. This is a questionairre, not an argument.
I think my vendetta against you at other boards is what really inspired you to make this response.
I love how you try to make it look like I am biased from the comments I made. You nitpick what I said in such a pathetic manner, picking out just the little things that the general consensus of the forum might disagree with.
The hard drive and broadband in the area of hardware, primarily. I think these could have a big effect on gaming. I realize that Sony provides these as well, but the problem there is that it comes in the form of an add on. I can see that doing somewhat well, but not on the same level as the Xbox.
Another thing that interests me about Xbox is that it is a newcomer to the industry. While this doesn\'t determine anything in the realm of whether it will win or lose by any means, it does mean that there is more "adventure" in the showing interest in it. There is more to await; more in the area of what the first party will create, more on the network plans, more on the route the console maker wishes to follow. I don\'t support Xbox above anything else, but it probably would be one of the more interesting consoles to back simply because not as much is predetermined.
favorably we do comprehend its graphics aim be mediocre?
What would you ask this for? I already have established that I don\'t await the game much. It\'s graphics aim to be mediocre? I could believe that if you provided a link about it. I do recall reading something along those lines in the past, however.
I\'m more interested in the gameplay concepts and the like, but even then, I don\'t care much about it.
require what features?..oh wait..you mean those PC features that can be found on the *gasp* PC?
Okay, I must say, what the hell? That section of your reply isn\'t even the slightest bit compatible with what you tried to argue. I didn\'t say a thing about Gamecube requiring these features; on the contrary, I said that lack of extra features wasn\'t a good thing. I\'d rather get a DVD player built in than not get one, basically. But, like I have already said,
the console will still be great regardless of it\'s lacking these things.
I remember at NN you would jubilate the fact that GCN was a games only console and ridicule the PS2 for being a set-to-box(like xbox) as well as spread the word that this was nintendos greatest advantage...what happen?
I gradually went through a transition from Nintendo fan to being more of an all around fellow. Unlike you, who has wild opinion changes rather frequently. Speaking of which, didn\'t you stop caring about consoles? So why are you arguing about them here?