PSX5Central
Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: §ôµÏG®ïñD on June 30, 2001, 02:35:04 PM
-
Got bored so i went through some martial arts sites... found this kewl animation http://www.psx2central.com/nathan/animated.rm
Not bad with Maya and Poweranimator. :)
-
Pretty cool!
I can do that. . .
*crack
*crack
*snap. . . oops!
Pour water into an ice tray, and it becomes the ice tray, put it in the freezer and it is ice. Put it in a cup and it is the cup. . . well, after it melts, of course.
-
cool:)
is this that Bruce lee game coming out for X-box? or was it ps2? i cant remember.
-
Nah, not in-game footage, just some sort of animation of interviews and footage from movies.
Music: Enter the Dragon, as is most of the model for the animation.
Bonus points for the person who can name the movie that the yellow outfit he\'s wearing at the end of the animation came from.
Give ya a hint:
Bruce never finished it, and he fought Kareem Abdul-Jabaar of all people.
-
Damn real good animation, :D pretty cool
-
Originally posted by JerginsSoft
Nah, not in-game footage, just some sort of animation of interviews and footage from movies.
Music: Enter the Dragon, as is most of the model for the animation.
Bonus points for the person who can name the movie that the yellow outfit he\'s wearing at the end of the animation came from.
Give ya a hint:
Bruce never finished it, and he fought Kareem Abdul-Jabaar of all people.
Game of death.. i win i win.. sigh.
-
That was an actual interview with Bruce Lee. They played it on Biography on A&E.
Nice work.
-
Kareem Abdul-Jabaar
Now thats one funny name. :)
-
Originally posted by Avatarr
Now thats one funny name. :)
He\'s just a basketball player. He\'s lucky though...he got private lessons from Bruce Lee. That really sucks that he was accidentally poisoned by hypersensitivity known as Cerebral Dema...:( That guy just kiced a**. I think he\'d be in his mid-70\'s right now if he was still alive...:crying:
-
Wasn\'t he in his 20\'s when he died? That was...what 80-something? So that would make him 40-ish.
I could be wrong though.
-
Originally posted by EmperorRob
Wasn\'t he in his 20\'s when he died? That was...what 80-something? So that would make him 40-ish.
I could be wrong though.
he was 33 when he died.
-
yea sucks his son died too
he was awesome - The Crow was an awesome movie can\'t say the same for the sequels though shame
-
That must have taken forever to render. Very impressive I must say.
-
That is a wicked animation! I think in real life that no one can beat Bruce Lee training methods. :D
-
That was pretty cool. I recognized the part where he was talking about water from the A&E Biography on him. Hopefully the XBox game will looke as realistic.
-
Originally posted by pstwo
That is a wicked animation! I think in real life that no one can beat Bruce Lee training methods. :D
You haven\'t seen some Shaolin monks training. The stuff that some of these guys do boggles the mind. My old kung-fu teacher\'s teacher came into our class one day and beat the sh|t out of us and we saw a video and some pics from his school in China. One word: DAMN!!!
-
Originally posted by pstwo
That is a wicked animation! I think in real life that no one can beat Bruce Lee training methods. :D
That\'s abit off dood... Like all sports, They get better and more advanced as time goes on.. Look at old training for sports. then compare them too todays new way too train. You will find that Todays Athletes will totally kick arse over the old athletes ways... It\'s like that with martial arts. Now that it\'s such a known and practiced thing.. There are A LOT of people that can beat Bruce lee if he was alive today.
Train these days has advanced and training equipment has too. :)
-
Originally posted by §ôµÏG®ïñD
You will find that Todays Athletes will totally kick arse over the old athletes
Not true! Past athletes did not have the chance to use high-tech materials for equipment. Heck, some didn\'t use any protective gear! Some records still aren\'t broken to this day. And for the ones that were. . . go back in time and give that athlete the new stuff and they\'ll probably blow todays records. I\'m not saying that we get worse over time, but that to say that the athletic today could always beat the athletic of yesterday isn\'t entirely true.
-
Originally posted by Troglodyte
Not true! Past athletes did not have the chance to use high-tech materials for equipment. Heck, some didn\'t use any protective gear! Some records still aren\'t broken to this day. And for the ones that were. . . go back in time and give that athlete the new stuff and they\'ll probably blow todays records. I\'m not saying that we get worse over time, but that to say that the athletic today could always beat the athletic of yesterday isn\'t entirely true.
All off Bruce lee records are broken.. By a man that was trained by the same instructor.
Most world records are broken.. in there Time, the old Athletes were good. But if the athletes of today could go back too there time. We would see who\'s the best.. For example.. say the Aussie cricket team went back in time.. and had a comp against the OLD sir Donald era cricket team.. Who would win?.. I would say todays cricket team.. hell they even say it now. Aussie football. Same thing.. The way they train today is A LOT more harder then how they used too train. Records are set too be broken.. Just as tomorrows athletes will break records todays athletes set.
I\'m not saying EVERY single athlete from the old days are weaker then todays athletes.. I\'m just saying in general, Todays athletes are better then the 70\'s 80\'s era of athletes.
Old athletes make records.. New athletes break them..
-
Originally posted by §ôµÏG®ïñD
All off Bruce lee records are broken.. By a man that was trained by the same instructor.
Most world records are broken.. in there Time, the old Athletes were good. But if the athletes of today could go back too there time. We would see who\'s the best.. For example.. say the Aussie cricket team went back in time.. and had a comp against the OLD sir Donald era cricket team.. Who would win?.. I would say todays cricket team.. hell they even say it now. Aussie football. Same thing.. The way they train today is A LOT more harder then how they used too train. Records are set too be broken.. Just as tomorrows athletes will break records todays athletes set.
I\'m not saying EVERY single athlete from the old days are weaker then todays athletes.. I\'m just saying in general, Todays athletes are better then the 70\'s 80\'s era of athletes.
Old athletes make records.. New athletes break them..
. . . because of new equipment and more leisure time (or by making the sport a profession). ANd new vaccines and such. The human race isn\'t getting any better, it\'s technology that\'s getting better.
-
Originally posted by Troglodyte
. . . because of new equipment and more leisure time (or by making the sport a profession). ANd new vaccines and such. The human race isn\'t getting any better, it\'s technology that\'s getting better.
Technology is making the Human Race better and worse at the same time. We live longer, we are stronger, taller, smarter, and faster than our granparents were at our age just like they were compared to their grandparents, this can be attributed to technology(hormones) AND evolution. Its just a given. The human race is slowly evolving but Technology is actually slowing that process down, believe it or not.
-
Originally posted by Gohan
Technology is making the Human Race better and worse at the same time. We live longer, we are stronger, taller, smarter, and faster than our granparents were at our age just like they were compared to their grandparents, this can be attributed to technology(hormones) AND evolution. Its just a given. The human race is slowly evolving but Technology is actually slowing that process down, believe it or not.
Well, I believe that evolution includes the evolution of the mind and what we do to adapt to our surroundings. So I don\'t quite see how technology is slowing us down. As I see it, we use technology to change our environment so that we can evolve on other aspects of ourselves. Nevetheless, I agree.