PSX5Central
Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: videoholic on March 01, 2002, 08:52:26 AM
-
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
Take a look at this and tell us what you think. It definitely makes you think about it.
-
Makes you think - just a bit! Oh my god, that is pretty unbelievable stuff. Where do you find stuff like this vid?
-
There\'s a perfectly good explanation for this all. It\'s called the "Magic Boing" theory. The plane in question flew into the Pentagon\'s lower levels at a 45 digree angle causing extensive damage. It then ricoched off the first inner wall twice, jetesoned out of the wreckage where it hung suspended in the air for 1.3 seconds before continuing off at a sharp 60 digree angle to strike the sixth floor of a book depository a few blocks away. Remarkably, there wasn\'t any trace of significant damage on the Boing.. only a few superficial scratches and burn marks. Unfortunately, everyone on board still perished.
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
-
Originally posted by SonyFan
There\'s a perfectly good explanation for this all. It\'s called the "Magic Boing" theory. The plane in question flew into the Pentagon\'s lower levels at a 45 digree angle causing extensive damage. It then ricoched off the first inner wall twice, jetesoned out of the wreckage where it hung suspended in the air for 1.3 seconds before continuing off at a sharp 60 digree angle to strike the sixth floor of a book depository a few blocks away. Remarkably, there wasn\'t any trace of significant damage on the Boing.. only a few superficial scratches and burn marks. Unfortunately, everyone on board still perished.
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
That is awesome. I wish someone had video.
-
weird
defintely weird
see now if this isnt true whats the point to claiming a jet did and also what happened to the plane and all those people in it that crashed into the pentagon
something to think about
-
I live less than 30 miles away from the Pentagon and my father works there, he was there when it happened. Every eye witness spoken to confirmed that it was a plane, and the highway (I-95) is literally right next to the Pentagon\'s West side where it was hit. The local news interviewed many people, most of them being bystanders that saw the whole thing with their own eyes.
The fact that the plane swung in at a 45 degree angle accounts for the wings not colliding with the building as wide as it could be. Plus burning jet fuel keeps burning even when doused with thousands of gallons of water. Remember how the fire started back up a couple of times after the firefighters thought they put it out?
The government is a sneaky little bastard but I really don\'t think they would try to distort the simple facts of how the Pentagon was damaged and how American Flight 77 lost all of its passengers and crew.
-
I don\'t think any of us really think this is a coverup and the plane didn\'t really hit the building, but it really is odd when you think about it.
-
That is definitely a good article, fake or not. It does make one wonder if indeed this entire scheme was planned out by the Bush administration. I for one, still think that a jet caused the damage, with all the eye whiteness and all. But it does make you wonder.
-
It\'s called mind control, people. The CIA\'s MK Ultra project was completed a long time ago, and they\'ve been improving on it ever since. Most of the people inside the pentagon at the time are not suitable witnesses because they could only report hearing a loud noise and seeing flames. Those on the outside of the building were prescreened by the NSA, and prepared ahead of time with the "correct" version of events. This kind of technology is not new.
-
Interesting...
I know the secret.. The US goverment... uh *gets shot by CIA sniper*
-
Originally posted by fastson
Interesting...
I know the secret.. The US goverment... uh *gets shot by CIA sniper*
What cracks me up here is that despite being shot by the CIA, he still had enough life in him to type *gets shot by CIA*.:D
-
Originally posted by project86
What cracks me up here is that despite being shot by the CIA, he still had enough life in him to type *gets shot by CIA*.:D
And find the send button!!!!
-
Actually, a lot of that can probably be explained, or so I think. I\'m still formulating the ideas in my mind as I type, so if it doesn\'t make total sense...yeah
The pentagon\'s obviously heavily reinforced. Most likely a lot more so than a plane. When the plane hit the building, it most likely collapsed inward. That is why it only went far enough to damage the first ring.
The reason it only damaged the first floor is similar. The plane likely hit the building at a relatively high downward angle, causing it to collapse in from the top as well as the front. That\'s why it only would have damaged the first floor. The others were too heavily reinforced. It collapsed underthem, not having the force to initially knock them inwards.
First of all, some debris would have likely been cleared from the lawn to make room for emergence crews. This was a while later, as you can see by the fact that the upper floors have collapsed. Plus, there was nothing wrong with the plane until it made impact. At that point, if it was traveling at 250 miles per hour, and debris would likely end having the momentum to fly into the wreckage of the pentagon.
The dirt and gravel could have made it easier for repairs which would be made later. If there was any fire remaining in the building, it could have also helped to keep it from spreading.
With the wings, the plane would likely have been tilted at an angle from being flown by inexperienced pilots, who didn\'t take various wind factors into account. The wings aren\'t as strong as the body of the plane, and might have become dislodged or shattered from the initial force of the impact. Remember, the force of such an impact is beyond what any of us could likely imagine.
The Fire chief didn\'t see the plane hit. Its wreckage was most likely lodged within the first floor, which initially collapsed. He likely hadn\'t been in there due to the instability of above floors. When the above floors collapsed, they covered the plane\'s wreckage.
Of course I can\'t see the exact point of impact of the plane. There\'s water being sprayed in front of it. :rolleyes:
One thing their conspiracy theories are missing though. If the pentagon wasn\'t struck by a plane, how did they cause all that damage without the people on the nearby highway seeing a thing? Not to mention the eyewitness reports, and the fact that there\'s no reason why the government would destroy part of it\'s own central defense headquarters.