PSX5Central
Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: videoholic on September 04, 2002, 06:07:27 AM
-
Get your teams locked in.
Anyone know if we can make roster moves after Thursday? Not sure how thrusday games effect our being able to change roster.
For those of you who have no clue what I am talking about, I pity you.
-
I think Thurs. is the technical start of the week, thus you won\'t be able to do any type of Roster move till tuesday.
my team is already....I don\'t even know who I\'m playing, I guess I\'ll go check it out.
-
You can make any roster moves in terms of chosing benched players and starters up unitl the games those players are in start, but any trades or waiver actions don\'t go through until next week after thursday.
-
looks like I\'m playing this looser ^^
I\'m gonna bitch slap his ass! First play of the Rams season Faulk will tear his ACL, and I will then laugh so hard that I shit my pants.
-
And while you\'re doing, that, I\'ll pick up Faulk\'s backup :)
-
Any of you buying the stattracker? It\'s pretty cool. It\'s free this first weekend. Cool. You can watch all the teams and how they are all doing.
-
i might have to buy it, I can\'t stand how long it takes to update. All my players have done horrible today, and would like to know how bad Shox is kicking my ass.
-
damnit, I just checked the free preview of stat tracker....and shox beat me by1.7 points. if Darel Jackson would have done a bit more than 6yds recieving, than I might have won.
-
I ended up winning, actually, by only 2 points. Curtis Martin killed me.
Favre did well, so did Taylor. Kevin Johnson also had a great game for you.
-
You guys are all amateurs. Eat my dust.. Well, this week anyway..
-
I got the win, nothing else matters :)
-
Bah, my backups would have beaten all of you. Next week I am just going to bench all my guys and just let like 4 play. At least that will make it fair.
Team Cocky, esq.
-
I\'m not so sure about that. Travis Henry and Quadry Ismail had incredible games, both are on my bench :(. Henry had like 120 yards and 3 touchdowns.
-
My bench has scored over 99 points. and I still have a running back playing tomorrow night... Yawn...
-
My bench had over 82, with a player still playing now, and another one playing on Monday. That isn\'t bad either. Besides, you have 3 QBs, the highest scoring position, on your bench, but can only play one at a time, so it\'s really not the best comparison anyway. If I wanted to, I could start my entire bench.
-
I lost. God damn Priest Holmes murdered me.
-
Yeah, I grabbed QBs cause they are great for trading. My bench QBs did better than like 5 teams.
I have 2 backup running backs and a reciever.
Some of you guys are wasting your bench on a backup defense. Damn, just pickup a defense the week before you need thm. Defense is a big crapshoot anyway. Heck, I don\'t have a backup tight end either. You can see why. Only one person got more than 5 points with their tightend. They are worthless. I\'d much rather have warrick dunn on my bench than a back up tightend.
-
I think the bench\'s are too big. Why all the extra players theomen? It makes the league, "sloppy".
-
I did it because I hate you.
-
Cool.
By cool I mean, "Can I kill you with my penis?"
-
I don\'t know, can you?
-
Anyone want to trade? And none of this I\'ll trade you my crappy receiver for your good one. There has to be something good for both sides you know.
-
I offered you a trade Vid.
-
Rod Gardner is my sleeper pick. I got him late. He\'s my boy. I am actually looking for a WR, not to give one up. Do you not need a RB? Warrick Dunn may turn out to be a nice pick.
-
I normally love to trade, but I don\'t know that there is much we can trade. I don\'t want a QB, and the only thing I could really upgrade, while downgrading at WR, would be RB. That, of course, would require you giving me Green, and I know you don\'t want to see me with Green and Faulk.
That makes two people I can\'t trade with really, because, for some reason, me and James NEVER can work out a deal.
Anyway, someone else offer me something.
-
But you see the damage Garner can deal and how much the Raiders new coach is going to utilize him.
I need a WR. Bad. Anyone interested? I\'m willing to give Charlie Garner.
-
See. that\'s the problem with trading. Charlie Garner is not a starting RB quality player for most people. I have 3 RBs on my team I\'d rather play. So why would I give up a starting quality WR? *shrug*
Useually the types that work, in my experience, are 2 for 2 deals, where one player is upgrades, and one downgraded for both people involved.
-
What about Warrick Dunn? Could he not start on your team Shockwaves?
-
With Martin and Faulk? Not a chance. Take a look at where they were drafted.
-
Owens, Harrison, Boston. Not bad at all, I must say. Stephen Davis, also having a big day. Roar.
Death to the Boston Massacre *kills the massacre*. Rah.
Warrick Dunn, with Duckett, will not put up GREAT numbers. Thus, he shouldn\'t have any spot on Tony\'s starting RB\'s. Hell, he\'s not even fit for mine. Videoholic, you and I both know that he\'s Seminole trash, anyway :)
See Yuz.
-
shhhhhhhhh
-
Originally posted by shockwaves
I normally love to trade, but I don\'t know that there is much we can trade. I don\'t want a QB, and the only thing I could really upgrade, while downgrading at WR, would be RB. That, of course, would require you giving me Green, and I know you don\'t want to see me with Green and Faulk.
That makes two people I can\'t trade with really, because, for some reason, me and James NEVER can work out a deal.
Anyway, someone else offer me something.
Owens and Stephen Davis for Faulk!
*runs*
See Yuz.
-
Originally posted by ROL Jamas
Owens and Stephen Davis for Faulk!
*runs*
See Yuz.
This is where I\'d love to be a mod with editting powers :)