PSX5Central
Playstation/Gaming Discussions => PS3 Discussion => Topic started by: MAKAVELIUK on October 28, 2002, 01:28:44 PM
-
:eek:
http://www.playscope.com/viewarticle.php?num_article=776
-
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.playscope.com%2Ffichiers%2Fphotos%2F776%2Fgetaway223.jpg&hash=cdbfa9a8c674d5e2162cc5f35166a7a44f6883a1)
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.playscope.com%2Ffichiers%2Fphotos%2F776%2Fgetaway222.jpg&hash=95cb32741877cb5a54fbc87a08cd9efe20ad3846)
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.playscope.com%2Ffichiers%2Fphotos%2F776%2Fgetaway221.jpg&hash=19498d98cde753097e45a7aa33455cd295aa1c07)
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.playscope.com%2Ffichiers%2Fphotos%2F776%2Fgetaway220.jpg&hash=874207c04bd4d24f4c9e3c5b6be90a306f294151)
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.playscope.com%2Ffichiers%2Fphotos%2F776%2Fgetaway217.jpg&hash=d271de105157d78eb659c2fb9437e84164fa1738)
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.playscope.com%2Ffichiers%2Fphotos%2F776%2Fgetaway215.jpg&hash=b980b88d428dbc84988c299dcdab029cbb1f73bf)
Looks amazing:eek: :eek:
I hope the framerate has improved as much as the visuals has.
-
looks very very good....
-
Very realistic.You cant see the framerate from a pic though.
-
I\'ll be playing it tomorrow so I can judge the framerate for myself.
-
Originally posted by Unicron!
Very realistic.You cant see the framerate from a pic though.
good point
all the movies i have seen have a rather :crap: frame rate :(
-
...which is strange, because the devs themselves never claimed less than constant 60 fps themselves. Maybe the last view tweaks will really solve the framerate issues? I really do hope so...
-
Meh ! I\'m getting this game anyway. From previews from
a (very sceptic magazine) they say the framerate from the
ects build wasn\'t quite tops in the \'driving a vehicle\' part
of the game. The good news however is they found the \'on
foot\' parts of the game very very splendid :D . So I really
hope Studio Soho doesn\'t have to swallow their statement
that the final build WILL have a constant 50 fps framerate.
-
Visually OK\'ish. Far from amazing. I\'m forgiving lots here though, thanks to the scope of the project.
There\'s a word for this feeling I gots... underwhelmed? Yup.
-
i know someone who knows omeone from the company that makes it, he played a preview a few months ago, said frame rate is good, and the game is good
-
amazing :o
-
Slow down ? the DVD containing the getaway sitting in my PS2 has no slow down what so ever. It\'s very impressive stuff the roads are jam packed around 25-30 cars on screen at once all with reflections from the surronding buildings, sky etc. The handling is perfect nice weighty cars with good responsive handling this game will be big.
-
How about them pedestrians? Many of \'em? How\'s the AI? There are lots of people in London ya know, I expect to see lot of \'em in the game too. Which is why the pics released seem weird to me.
-
My expectations from the game(seen from pics only)
- Field of vision seems limited, notice on getaway217.jpg
- Reflections in objects are almost null, even GTA3 has more, reflections on vehicles
- I haven“t seen the game running, but something tells me that it will suffer from a lack of sense in speed.
- I like the idea of the game, though IMO lighting conditions could be better, i believe theres a huge lack of dynamic lighting, textures look always the same, like a paiting.
Well, its all i can think of now.
-
-There is smoke at the forground.Check the last pic.
-Also check th elast pic
-Its not arcdady, its not a racing game.That\'s not an issue.
-Looks better than GTA3 and many other games.How many textures do u want?There are 3GB compressed textures.I see more repeated textures in other games.