PSX5Central
Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: Bossieman on November 17, 2002, 09:27:45 AM
-
Well I havent posted so much here lately because of 2 factors. My wife kicked me out but I´m over it now. The second reason is that I have actually made some important discoveries in physics togheter with an other student.
I know it sounds crazy but we have actually been able to explain a lot of unsolved physicsproblems with our theory.
We can explain superconductivity, dark matter, gravity and Bose Einstein Condensate. Some fundamental quantum mechanics laws are in our theory totally wrong.
I dont want to get to technical but I can explain why I think todays physics are wrong.
modern physics are based on a very few physicaltheories and laws. Maxwells equations for electromagnetic force, relativitytheory and quantum mechanics.
The big error in todays physics is that the 2 most important theories, General relativity and Quantummechanics can not be both right. We know for 100% that both theories cant be right, one or even both are wrong but they are not both right.
The ultimate challenge is to come up with a theory that explains all physical observations with just one ultimate equation.
Today there is no such equation. We have to use QM when we study small distances like what happens inside a atom and we use GR when it comes to galaxies and planets.
I have to say that me and my friend has managed to come up with a theory that explains a lot of unsolved physical phenomena.
-
Like why microphysics & macrophysics follow different patterns?
or the super-string theory or something like that stuff right there????
*Goes back to setting the clock on VCR*
-
For me it is crazy that a lot of scientist are just accepting the laws of physics as ultimate. Much of todays physics are based on theories that is almost 100 years old. We know something is wrong but we cant find out the correct explaination to physical phenomen so we stick to the old equations/explainations.
We always need to question physical laws to evolve physics. If we dont question physics wont evolve.
Dont take me for a crayzy man but I can say to you all that we are so wrong when it comes to explain some basic fundamental things today.
We dont know what gravity is , what mass is, why the neutron is heavier than the proton.
Tons of things are unexplain with todays theories and belive me when I say that those theories cant explain those things because they are all wrong.
prepare for some big changes in physics pretty soon. I´m not joking.
-
I agree. We are on the verge of a massive scientific revelation. Think about how much shit would be thrown out the window if everyone recognizes that laws we take as truths may not be true. ( like the speed of light being a constant for example...)
-
Originally posted by CHIZZY
( like the speed of light being a constant for example...)
a perfect example, we base all our physics on this. If that is wrong everything falls.
It seems like people just accept that c is constant and doesnt question it at all.
In our theory c is not an maximum speed or constant. We can explain why it seems that a radioactive matter "lives" longer at high speeds. And we dont have to twist time.
-
<-----Got lost when bossieman said that he hasn\'t posted much.
-
Wow Bossieman, if that\'s true, you and your friend are very smart. Not everyone discover new formulae in physics...
-
I think that if one man knew the whole truth and was given all the answers, he would kill himself before anyone else could get it out of him.
-
and so scientific beliefs rival religious ones
civilizations wont let go of thier stated laws
-
Some times I wonder why in the world Bossie man comes here. I have to assume his IQ drops 5 points every time he enters here.
Good stuff. Very interesting. I can understand what you have written so far, but I assume you don\'t stop their. I\'m scared. Hold me.
-
This is deep.
-
Don\'t warp my mind. Everything that I have learned so far in Physics has seemed to make sense.
-
Quite profound! Right now, I\'m studying Newtonian Mechanics, which to what your doing is quite simple. Personally, any help I can get on Physics is greatly appreciated.
-
Congrats. Can you go into more detail?
Just enough detail that I could use to take credit.
Have you come up with a theory for why the the closer you get to the bathroom the more you have to pee/shit? <<
-
i made a time machine once if u want to know how then PM me =]
-
Originally posted by Gohan
Congrats. Can you go into more detail?
Just enough detail that I could use to take credit.
Have you come up with a theory for why the the closer you get to the bathroom the more you have to pee/shit? <<
HAHAHAHA :D :D :D :D :D :D
-
Big words...... :eek:
SHINY!!!
Quantummechanics - isnt that a duck-billed thing?
Anyway congrats on discovering sumtin or another
-
That\'s really great Bossieman. Just think, maybe when I learn about this stuff in a few years, we\'ll be talking about recent discoveries made by you. If you could describe any of this further, I\'d love to hear. I like learning about this type of stuff, and although I\'m sure much would go over my head, with my limited background in the area, I would be interested anyway. If you can\'t really say more though, I understand. Congrats.
-
When will this information be making it on the Discovery channel?
I don\'t believe anything until I see it on TV.
Ace
-
Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.
-
I will list things we can explain with our theory.
1. The question of what a photon is.
2. The dualism of partices and waves.
3. Bose Einstein condensate
4. Superconductivity
5. dark matter
6. what mass ad gravity actually is.
7. We unite all forces into one force.
What do our theory say about the world.
1. Universe is accelerating
2. Velocity of c is not constant.
3. time is not a physical phenomena.
4. Gravity is negative energy.
5. What we say is particles are just combination of LESA
6. Everything will eventually turn into lighter particles.
-
That might explain how in the Inka civilization gold was found with less density than normal(still unexplained how.Indications of alchemy).Perhaps this might lead to the descovery of the secret of alchemy?
-
Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.
-
Originally posted by Ace
When will this information be making it on the Discovery channel?
I don\'t believe anything until I see it on TV.
Ace
I hear that we are all going to die in a couple years on the TV. It must be true :rolleyes: (I know your kidding ;) )
-
Originally posted by Unicron!
That might explain how in the Inka civilization gold was found with less density than normal(still unexplained how.Indications of alchemy).Perhaps this might lead to the descovery of the secret of alchemy?
Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.
-
According to Einstein theory we observe a longer lifetime for the particle because time is going slower for the particle, what we say is that the particle lives longer because we put in LESA in the system.
Also there was an ancient column discovered in Delhi made from inalterable/unimpaired iron no matter how old it was.It seems u might have found the answer to many questions created from the many archaelogical descoveries that indicate to knowledge not yet known to our present civilizations.
I have another question.From what you are saying can a solid substance become lighter if its particles are hit by antilesa even to a degree it wont be affected by gravity at all and back if hit with lesa?
-
Originally posted by Unicron!
I have another question.From what you are saying can a solid substance become lighter if its particles are hit by antilesa even to a degree it wont be affected by gravity at all and back if hit with lesa?
Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.
-
Originally posted by Unicron!
Also there was an ancient column discovered in Delhi made from inalterable/unimpaired iron no matter how old it was.It seems u might have found the answer to many questions created from the many archaelogical descoveries that indicate to knowledge not yet known to our present civilizations.
Can you tell me more about this, my english is not as good as my physics, can you explain it in a way with simplier words.
-
Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.
-
I atually think I probably can explain why we only observe lefthanded proteins in all living things. Damn that would be super cool and a really nice challege for the theory.
-
According to what you\'ve said, objects are made up of lesa. Would it be possible for an object to be composed of antilesa?
-
Originally posted by shockwaves
According to what you\'ve said, objects are made up of lesa. Would it be possible for an object to be composed of antilesa?
Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.
-
....what is lesa? I may have missed it in an earlier post, but there were a lot of them to sort through to find it :p this is very interesting bossieman!!! i wanna hear more about what you are experimenting with!
-
Read all the posts, your question will be answered :)
-
/me stares at the screen blankly as his brains drip out of his nose...
I think I\'ll take ACE\'s route and wait for Lenard Nemoy to explain it all to me in some Discovery Channel Special in a few years.
-
Bossieman,i hust hope that yer theories dont make life any more difficult (i\'m still pissed at newton) coz if they do i\'m comin after you :p.
but if u dont mind me asking, how much energy does a lesa posses?, or do u still have to figure it out, what i mean is that since yer theory is so radical common physical quantities of today(eg. Kg, S, N,...) may not apply to it.
-
Originally posted by Tyrant
how much energy does a lesa posses?, or do u still have to figure it out, what i mean is that since yer theory is so radical common physical quantities of today(eg. Kg, S, N,...) may not apply to it.
Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.
-
Bossieman,
Not to be a weenie, but could you tell me what your qualifications are in this field. It would make reading your findings have more meaning for me.
Thanks!
Ace
-
Originally posted by Ace
Bossieman,
Not to be a weenie, but could you tell me what your qualifications are in this field. It would make reading your findings have more meaning for me.
Thanks!
Ace
I dont know if i understand your question, this field is new, we have invented it. Its a new way of explainig physical phenomena.
-
Originally posted by Bossieman
I dont know if i understand your question, this field is new, we have invented it. Its a new way of explainig physical phenomena.
What is your background in the field of science? Are you just a student? Will these findings be submitted to your peers for review?
Just wondering.
Ace
-
Originally posted by Bossieman
Can you tell me more about this, my english is not as good as my physics, can you explain it in a way with simplier words.
My English aint good but Ill try
Archaeological dyscoveries show that humans from ancent civilizations knew techniques and knowledges still not known to ours.
1.The gold with less density that the Inkas used.
2.The non aged iron column found in Delhi
3.alchemisty
4.a)According to the Arabs,Egyptians were able to swing HUGE megaliths to the air and move them the same distance an arrow would reach if shot from a bow(The mystery to how the pyramids\' were built?).b)Father Fransisco Alvares secrettary of the Portugal Embassy in 1515 witnessed a "flying" golden stick in the Monastery of Bizan.Centuries before him many went there to worship the "miracle".It was just in the air.Not moving.The stick disappeared without a trace.c)Old South American traditions assure that in the ancient times "humans could fly and move megaliths without any effort".d)Plinios in Physics History talked about the Egyptians\' techniques that could make liths fly to the air based on scientific methods etc.They possibly knew how to use antigravity.
There are even more in Robert Charroux\'s book "the unknown history of man".
There also many other descoveries that indicate a few only insiders from the ancient times may had known the secret of hydrogen bombs,electricity, etc plus many others that archaeologists couldnt explain even with hypothetical explanations.Descoveries that conclude to knowledge we dont know yet but was known centuries or even thousands of years before.
BTW:Some names could be wrongly spelled as the information was taken from the the greek translation of the book.
-
Originally posted by Ace
What is your background in the field of science? Are you just a student? Will these findings be submitted to your peers for review?
Just wondering.
Ace
Im workig on my second master, this time in theoretical physics.
-
Originally posted by Unicron!
My English aint good but Ill try
Archaeological dyscoveries show that humans from ancent civilizations knew techniques and knowledges still not known to ours.
1.The gold with less density that the Inkas used.
2.The non aged iron column found in Delhi
3.alchemisty
4.a)According to the Arabs,Egyptians were able to swing HUGE megaliths to the air and move them the same distance an arrow would reach if shot from a bow(The mystery to how the pyramids\' were built?).b)Father Fransisco Alvares secrettary of the Portugal Embassy in 1515 witnessed a "flying" golden stick in the Monastery of Bizan.Centuries before him many went there to worship the "miracle".It was just in the air.Not moving.The stick disappeared without a trace.c)Old South American traditions assure that in the ancient times "humans could fly and move megaliths without any effort".d)Plinios in Physics History talked about the Egyptians\' techniques that could make liths fly to the air based on scientific methods etc.They possibly knew how to use antigravity.
There are even more in Robert Charroux\'s book "the unknown history of man".
There also many other descoveries that indicate a few only insiders from the ancient times may had known the secret of hydrogen bombs,electricity, etc plus many others that archaeologists couldnt explain even with hypothetical explanations.Descoveries that conclude to knowledge we dont know yet but was known centuries or even thousands of years before.
BTW:Some names could be wrongly spelled as the information was taken from the the greek translation of the book.
Wow, that is cool I must look deeper into that field.