PSX5Central
Playstation/Gaming Discussions => PS3 Discussion => Topic started by: FluKe on December 05, 2002, 12:33:49 AM
-
Can someone confirm this???
Do you remember the PlayStation-X cd-rom drive Sony was to produce for the SNES? Rumors has it that Nintendo\'s lawers have taken a second look at the contract they had with Sony. To them it looks like it was Sony who broke the deal and not Nintendo. That means, according to them, that Nintendo has the legal right to claim not only the name/brand PlayStation, but also profits Sony has made on it.
*tremble*
I really hope this is NOT true....
Also another rumor is that Nintendo is to BUY SEGA & CAPCOM!!!!
This sound more true in comparison with the rumor above, but again it\'s NOT good for Sony or PS2 fans...:(
- FluKe
References:
http://ga.gamesquad.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5760
http://sen.zophar.net/ (Swedish)
Sorry for my bad english.....
-
That battle went on and on... do you really think something LIKE THIS would only come out years later? Even if so, I much highly doubt Sony could loose everything because of something like that. In other words, I don\'t know what laws there are in Japan, but overhere, profits belong to the company that makes them.
-
Quote from Lord Federman over at Gaming Age Forums:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What if I said in addition to possible corporate acquisitions, exclusive software and blockbuster deals -- Nintendo had the technology and legal capability to make a major deathblow against one of the competitors. Because it\'s true.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://ga.gamesquad.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5760
He has the inside information, but has signed an NDA. He was also the one who posted the news of the merger between Rare and Microsoft long time before it was announced...
- FluKe
-
Read this...
http://pub175.ezboard.com/fzeldauniverse86453frm61.showMess
age?topicID=351.topic
------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently nintendo had the idea of making the snes a cd-drive and thought of the name "playstation"... as Sony were very high into the cd business (cd-players, walkmans etc.) Nintendo asked them to build the cd-drive code name "playstation" for the snes.
Meanwhile Philips were also in the works of a cd-based console called the CD-i and they asked Nintendo for some help, Nintendo gave them the right to produce four Zelda games on it which they did.
Sony were angry at this because they thought that they were being cheated so they dumped Nintendo and took the idea of the cd-based console aswell as the name "playstation".
Sony and Nintendo\'s contract was for seven years and guess what? This is their last year as partners according to the contract...
So, as you have read from dracool\'s post, Nintendo lawyers are suing Sony, blah blah blah...
You would think "why did Nintendo wait until the very last month to sue?"
Well, the answer is very simple yet sneaky... some suggest that Nintendo had this planned for a long time and waited until the final month of the contract to suck every single last penny from Sony!
-------------------------------------------------------------
This CAN\'T be true..(/me twiddle fingers). It would be like living in a videogaming HELL!!!
- FluKe
-
This is from GameFeeder (http://www.gamefeeder.net/news.php?action=list&start=28)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This comes courtesy of a reliable source at Google Newsgroups, with some very cryptic (but utterly fascinating) new tidbits:
"...There are 3 separate annoncements, but on the same day. The first is a new 2nd party. It\'s a very well known company, but not who you\'d think.
The second is the confirmation of 1st and 2nd party ONLINE titles, all due before summer. The new 2nd party has 2-3 themselves. One is a massive collaboration.
The third is even more shocking than the first two. New hardware, which will make everyone do a double take. I\'ll just say its the answer to all of the cube owners impatience. Look for the 23rd to be the day. It was originally slated for 2 weeks prior, but a contractual hang-up caused a delay..." Now, don\'t let your imagination run wild. Oh, bugger it. Run wild, be my guest!.
We\'ll keep you at the forefront of this story! ...Better than a soap opera!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm.. Let\'s hope this is the real news instead of the other shite;)
-
LOL, it just doesn\'t work like that. AFAIK you can\'t just wait for years and then look for mistakes made within a contract in the PAST. This is a joke.
Besides, I don\'t know why I\'m even replying to this. :confused:
-
I would most likely sell my GC if Nintendo did something as low as this, I really would.
-
Its false.. He has admited he was only joking :)
The "megaton" is infact a announcement of software titles coming to the GameCube.
All this talk about buyouts and suing Sony is false.
EDIT: The news you found at gamefeeder sounds pretty reliable. We will see within a few weeks I guess :)
-
I\'ll believe these rumors when I see them.
-
I don\'t think there is a megaton announcement.
This whole PlayStation thing is really far fetched. Not going to happen.
-
There is such a thing as statute of limitations. Similar to what 7 said. Although for this situation I don\'t know how long it would be.
-
Is there any particular reason this is in the main forum?
-
*yawn*
-
Nintendo had rumored a "big announcement" a few weeks ago in Japan... If that\'s where this started, then it\'s the device that lets you play Gameboy Advance games on a television. It plugs into the ports under the Cube.
If not, and Nintendo has ground to sue Sony... Go get em, Nintendo! ;]
But seriously, it just seems like that guy\'s imagination along with the rumors leading up to Nintendo\'s new peripheral announcement.
-Eik
-
I prefer "PowerStation" over Playstation, anyway. :p
-
I\'d love to see Nintendo sue Sony like that. It just tickles the Nintendo fanboy deep inside me to think of such a thing :)
-
it won\'t happen, but I\'d like to see it happen just because it would be something somewhat interesting.