PSX5Central

Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: Tyrant on February 20, 2003, 01:30:09 AM

Title: Extremely in depth GFFX review.
Post by: Tyrant on February 20, 2003, 01:30:09 AM

check it out over here (http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/gffx/gffx-ref-p1.html)
it seems the fx out performs the r9700 i most tests.

Title: Extremely in depth GFFX review.
Post by: §ôµÏG®ïñD on February 20, 2003, 03:07:21 AM

it always has, just by a small margin. Also being a lot louder. Haven\'t read the review you\'ve posted, but if it\'s showing GFfx being a lot faster then ATI\'s card. I stand corrected. :)

Title: Extremely in depth GFFX review.
Post by: Seed_Of_Evil on February 21, 2003, 04:21:50 AM

This is a shot from the demo.

Title: Extremely in depth GFFX review.
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on February 21, 2003, 04:34:04 AM

Thats great, but its what can be done in the game that counts.

Title: Extremely in depth GFFX review.
Post by: §ôµÏG®ïñD on February 21, 2003, 04:50:17 AM

real world is were it counts.. a person without any background or little to no background doesn\'t impress me. The fact she has no hair doesn\'t help either..

Title: Extremely in depth GFFX review.
Post by: Seed_Of_Evil on February 22, 2003, 03:43:51 AM

That was a facial-expression-demo. I think it will be able to show hair :)

Title: Extremely in depth GFFX review.
Post by: §ôµÏG®ïñD on February 22, 2003, 05:03:51 AM

lol, not saying it couldn\'t. Just saying the amount of polys used in that demo could be huge. Adding hair (nurbs) could make the demo laggy.  (but i doubt it ;))