PSX5Central

Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: videoholic on December 24, 2003, 01:54:12 AM

Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 24, 2003, 01:54:12 AM
Last week seems to be worthless for most teams...  So I am bringing in the playoff thread a week early!!!  :bounce:
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on December 24, 2003, 05:23:45 AM
woooo!

Go BUCS!!!

err, sorry vid....
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 24, 2003, 06:07:41 AM
WHo are the bucs?  I\'m a patriot fan now.  ;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: square_marker on December 24, 2003, 01:28:33 PM
New England / Tennessee .vs.  St. Louis / Philly    for super bowl

BLINGO
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 24, 2003, 06:16:55 PM
Philly?

We 0wned them.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on December 27, 2003, 02:19:06 PM
^^^

We sure did. Man, the Niners had so much potential this year. But those loses b/c of the kicker, and the inability to win games on the road killed them...until they went to philly ;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 27, 2003, 02:54:28 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
Philly?

We 0wned them.


It\'s too bad the cowboys suck this year.  THey didn\'t even make it into the playoffs.  Doh.. Wait a second...

Has any of your analysis of football been in any way correct this year?

Besides the bucs suck.  Cause damn do they ever.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 27, 2003, 05:52:30 PM
Dallas will not go anywhere in the playoffs.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on December 27, 2003, 06:23:25 PM
Cowboys...ohh yes the wonderous team of this year. I don\'t see them get past the first round...
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 28, 2003, 04:45:21 AM
I don\'t either, but before you said they wouldnt make the playoffs and that their quaterback should be gotten rid of.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on December 28, 2003, 10:41:17 AM
I can see Dallas winning in the first round if they play the right team.  I mean, I don\'t see Minnesota or Carolina as being anything that special these days.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 28, 2003, 04:09:30 PM
Man... I\'m really rooting for the Packers this year... That was awesome... They were cheering for Arizona, two thousand miles away... And then Arizona kicks the Vikings out of the playoffs, and the Packers are in.

So yeah, let\'s go Packers.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 28, 2003, 07:57:50 PM
Packers could do it.  They have a home game next week and they are starting to look good.

Plus the whole side story of Favre\'s pops kicking the bucket makes it a lock.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 28, 2003, 08:49:49 PM
The NFC is wide open... Rams and Eagles aren\'t consistent.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on December 29, 2003, 02:19:46 AM
Aren\'t consistant my ass!  The Eagles have won 10 of 11 with the one loss coming in OT.  They beat 3 of the 5 other NFC playoff teams in that stretch.  St. Louis has won 7 of 8 and 11 of 13.  If that isn\'t consistant, what the hell does it take to be consistant?  Who in the NFL outside of the Pats has been more consistant?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 29, 2003, 05:40:26 AM
The bucs have been pretty darn consistent..  Oh wait..  NEvermind.  You are talking about consistently good.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 29, 2003, 01:10:43 PM
I dunno... They were consistent, but the Eagles looked beatable against the Niners, and well the Rams lost to the Lions.

The Lions.


Roar.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on December 29, 2003, 02:08:14 PM
Quote
Originally posted by shockwaves
Aren\'t consistant my ass!  The Eagles have won 10 of 11 with the one loss coming in OT.  They beat 3 of the 5 other NFC playoff teams in that stretch.  St. Louis has won 7 of 8 and 11 of 13.  If that isn\'t consistant, what the hell does it take to be consistant?  Who in the NFL outside of the Pats has been more consistant?


You should know now that if Swidfi predicts it - then it WON\'T happen. It\'s always the opposite.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 29, 2003, 02:13:50 PM
Packers vs. Patriots

That\'s the Superbowl pick.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 29, 2003, 02:19:43 PM
Blah... blah... blah... That\'s it, I\'m starting the first PSX2Central Pick\'Em league next year and I will own you all.

This is my final standings. I won my friend\'s league, was in the 99th percentile out of about 200,000, and was 76th in another league with 14,000.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: theomen on December 29, 2003, 04:53:20 PM
Superbowl pick;
Pats vs Rams

Toilet Bowl pick;
Raiders vs Cards

Scum around the side;
Chargers vs Bucs

Oops I shit in the sink;
49ers vs Bengals
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 30, 2003, 05:38:12 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
Packers vs. Patriots

That\'s the Superbowl pick.


Holy shit, I actually agree with your prediction.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: GmanJoe on December 30, 2003, 05:55:05 AM
I hate the Cowboys more than I love the Steelers and Redskins (if that makes any sense to any of you).
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on December 30, 2003, 04:55:13 PM
Woah Woah...the Cardinals beat the Vikings and took them out of the playoffs!?

The Cowboys really don\'t have a good QB. He showed it vs. the Saints as well as all other games where their defense didn\'t stand up straight. Plus, Carolina is a pretty good team. GO PACKERS!!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 30, 2003, 05:29:00 PM
Damn Spurrier.  Why did you freakin gleave the Gators?????  Now you are probably going to end up in Nebraska and we are stuck with friggen Zook...  UGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Luke on December 30, 2003, 05:42:19 PM
haha, screw the gators.



goodbye coach dick:(
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagobears.com%2Fphotos%2FJaurontouse.jpg&hash=e780f349fcfbd6ddf8aaca09eb73f86efe328b54)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: unfocused on December 30, 2003, 10:32:21 PM
maybe the Colts defense will decide to show up this week...two weeks ago was pathetic.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 30, 2003, 10:41:57 PM
I can\'t really complain about Dennis Erickson this year... He should have straigtened out that kicker situation a LONG time ago...

I want Terrell Owens to go.

Brandon Lloyd is the next big thing. Everyone watch and see.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: PSX_J on December 31, 2003, 01:01:41 AM
Cowboys have Carolina. They beat them when they last met which means nothing but Carolina has been struggiling a bit. If they play like they did against the Saints, no chance but otherwise they should be able to make it into the second round.  From there the only thing they really have to rely on is Bill Parcells ingenious coaching. We\'ll see, before you put the young team down remember the playoffs are full of surprises...I mean crap it\'s a miracle they even got in, I thought if anything it\'d be next year or the year after.

Word of advice to opposing offenses: Watch out for Roy Williams, has got to be one of the hardest if not the hardest hitting safety in the NFL.


oh and erm...Pats will win tha Superbowl, hands down.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on December 31, 2003, 01:09:20 AM
Packers will beat the Patriots in a big heart-warming story as Brett Favre retires.

I think the Cowboys have an edge on Carolina, but man I hope the Panthers win.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on December 31, 2003, 01:37:30 AM
I\'m gonna say this right now.

John Fox > Bill Parcells
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on December 31, 2003, 05:23:41 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
I can\'t really complain about Dennis Erickson this year... He should have straigtened out that kicker situation a LONG time ago...

I want Terrell Owens to go.

Brandon Lloyd is the next big thing. Everyone watch and see.


How about if the two bays trade Owens for Johnson...  Damn, that would be like trading a pile of shit for a pile of crap.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: PSX_J on December 31, 2003, 10:07:14 AM
Quote
John Fox > Bill Parcells


Why\'s that? Parcells will go down along with the likes of Tom Landry and Lambardi as a coaching legend.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on December 31, 2003, 11:34:46 AM
I\'d like to see the Colt\'s go all the way - don\'t have to win, but just go all the way. Will they? It depends if their defense shows up, because if they play like they did last weekend, they\'ll be eliminated pretty quick.

Second choice is the Packers.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 01, 2004, 11:58:41 AM
Belicheck > Fox (defense vs. defense)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on January 01, 2004, 01:36:55 PM
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
Belicheck > Fox (defense vs. defense)


No.

The Pats talent wise >>>>>>> The Panthers

Fox took an absolutely pitiful team and in two years has turned them completely around to win a normally tough division with minimal roster changes.  The Cowboys have more talent.  Every division winner in football has a lot more talent.  Fox doesn\'t have the impressive resume yet because this is only year 2 as a head coach for him.   But as the Giants D Coordinator, he lead a defense that was among the best in the league ever year.  When he left, the defense immediately got worse with the same players.  It\'s very noticable.  He took the panthers, a team with NOTHING, and he built them completely in his image.  A defensive team with a strong running game.  And who has he done it with?  Davis was an outcast that was under performing every year until this one.  They have no big name players.  The Pats have a ton of big name players.  The Cowboys have big names on defense and one of the best WR groups in football.  Fox just does more with less.  And in a few years when he has players he has chosen in the system more, they\'ll be even better.

Yes, Parcells is one of the best coaches of all time.  Hell, most of what he\'s done has been with my teams, I\'d know.  But this year I think John Fox has done a better job.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 01, 2004, 08:11:20 PM
TALENT... excuse me???

I believe it was the Patriots who were doomed by injuries, starting 42 different players throughout the year.  The big off-season acquisition of Roosevelt Colvin negated by an injury in week one...  at any given point Ted Washington, Ted Johnson, and Ty Law were injured, all at the same time at one point.

The pats top 3 recievers were all injured around week 10... but they won anyway.  I can\'t think of a team that used more rookies than the pats this year.  You would think Bethel Johnson is a vet, because he puts up amazing stats, but he\'s only a rookie.

It is true that NOW the Patriots are mostly healed, they have some of the best talent, but none that could match Indy or St. Louis.  However, there was a point in the season where they\'re talent was no better than Houston\'s.  Don\'t give me crap about talent, Belicheck is a GREAT coach.  Think of the Denver game, the Indy game, the dismantling of the Chad Pennington...  Belicheck comes up with some of the best defensive schemes... but then again Romeo Crennel deserves a lot of credit too since he coordinates the defense.

One more thing, the Pats DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT have a lot of big name players.  Only two Pats are going to the Pro Bowl.  Many no-name players emerged for the pats this year, Daniel Grahm, Bethel Johnson, Tedy Bruschi, Kevin Faulk...  The pats big name reciever Troy Brown was sidelined for a decent portion of the season, and has not been the same since.

Belicheck did quite a lot with the cards he was dealt.  John Fox did not have to deal with the overwhelming injuries Belicheck was handed.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 01, 2004, 10:17:19 PM
Bah. Who cares about the Pats? It simply is not fashionable to route for them!

I still maintain that the Colts would be the idea win for this Superbowl. That or the Packers and let Farve retire after the Bowl.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 01, 2004, 10:29:35 PM
Who is the dead man who wants to say that Favre is better than Montana?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on January 02, 2004, 09:00:28 AM
The Pats roster has a lot more talent than the Panthers, to the point where it isn\'t even close.  One constant throughout the season, you had the 3rd place person in the MVP vote running your offense in Tom Brady.  You don\'t have more big name players than the Rams or the Colts or a team like that, this is true.  But you do have more than the Panthers.  The only person on that team you could consider a big name player is Davis, and he earned a big part of that name recognition this year under Fox.  And even with those injuries I\'d dare say your team had more talent on the field on average throughout the season than the Panthers fielded.

The fact is that injuries or not, you were supposed to be where you are.  The Panthers weren\'t.

And Di, I\'m not gonna say that quite yet.  But I\'d say he\'s up there.  And if he wins the Super Bowl this year, he sure as hell gets closer.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: theomen on January 02, 2004, 02:08:41 PM
Lloyd is the m*tha f*ck\'n man, in two years he\'ll make every niner fan forget about Owens.  His catch vs the Hawks was the best catch of the year or maybe second behind Jurivicious\'.

Here\'s what I hope the Niners do in the draft, franchise Owens and trade his ass for a 1st round draft pick .  Trade up with their pick and get Kellen Winslow and trade down with the other pick and get Tommy Harris.  If that happend, I would be a happy boy.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 02, 2004, 02:28:43 PM
shockwaves, lets not forget about Julius Peppers, probably the second biggest name on the team.  I still firmly believe that the talent was always there in Carolina, just not in the right positions.  They corrected the RB position, and found a QB in Jake Delohme, but other than that, they have the same players they\'ve had in years past, now they\'re winning.

I\'d like to agree with you when you say Tom Brady is a big name player, but the fact is he is very underated, and still lacking in recognition.  In the past three years, he is the winningest active QB, and is undefeated lifetime in OT.  Yet he has not gotten any respect because he is hidden behind Steve McNair and Peyton Manning.

I strongly disagree with you when you say even with the injuries they were still better than the Panthers.  If you consider a team that had to start more rookies than any other team this season better than the Panthers, who are built mainly on veteran players, that is sad.  

The Patriots success relies totally on the shoulders of their coach, he is my NFL Coach of the year.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on January 02, 2004, 10:58:29 PM
Talent does not directly translate into success.  The thing is, when people look at the Panthers I think they see a team that doesn\'t have the talent to win the Super Bowl, and I think that\'s true.  As far as pure talent, of the 4 teams in their division, I\'d say they rank 2nd in defense and 4th in offense out of 4 teams.  No one says the same thing when they look at the Patriots.  The fact is, they had a lot of injury problems, but even when they had to start rookies and they had to play backups, they had a ton of talent to surround those players with.  

As for the Panthers, yes, Julius Peppers is very talented.  Jake Delohme is not.  Delohme is a care taker type QB.  He\'s there to not make mistakes and watch over the offense...not screw things up for the running game and the defense.  

And sure the Panthers have a lot of Vets.  A lot of those same exact vets were on a team that went 1-15 two years ago before Fox arrived.  This team went from 1-15 to 7-9 to 11-5 under Fox.  Two years ago the Pats were world champs and the Panthers were the worst team in the league, and a lot of both of those teams remains today.  So yeah, I\'d say John Fox has done more with less.  Consider that at the start of the year ESPN picked the Pats as the 6th best team in the NFL...best in their division, and the Panthers as the 22nd best, last in their division, and I\'d say it\'s pretty clear that Fox has done a lot more all things considered.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 03, 2004, 02:17:59 PM
all i know is that dallas betta whoop that a$$ tonight. i have a feeling they are going to choke. damn that\'s my team but they seem to never show up for big games. oh well if they lose i won\'t be too dissappointed,..they went farther than i expected.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 03, 2004, 02:33:12 PM
Well...Mcnair has two interceptions..Ed George is out of the game....Not looking good for the Titans.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 03, 2004, 04:36:23 PM
looks like the ravens are cooked. i\'d like some hot sauce on those wings! ;). seriously tho..i\'m at work but it seems the game went down to the wire :crap: i missed it
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 03, 2004, 04:42:14 PM
Bummer, Titans won.

They won\'t be a superbowl team. Not a chance. They are struggling just to get this far and now George is hurt, Mcnair took some more injuries on..Nope..Nope.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 03, 2004, 07:47:45 PM
Coach of the year... (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1699420)

Congrats Belichick!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 03, 2004, 08:06:42 PM
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
Coach of the year... (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1699420)

Congrats Belichick!


Marvin Lewis should of got it.
:D
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 04, 2004, 01:16:31 AM
Not the way that defense choked against the Brownies.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 04, 2004, 05:29:34 AM
what did i tell ya? dallas just looked like crap out there! man i seriously don\'t know if the team can be built around quincy,.i mean you have a good receiving squad in grant glenn & galloway. i know one thing and i try to give everyone a chance but troy hambrick has to go. this cat barley gets touched & he goes down.

what happened last night was there was no offense so the defense got wore down,..add to the fact they blitzing the hell outa delhomme & wala! maybe carolina just had their number & i know when you\'re watching tv you can\'t see the whole field but damn the whole 2nd half negative yardage? parcells is gonna have to do something next year. because trust .they will not be there next year playin like that.

i know i\'m ranting but damn it\'s like i said dallas never steps up for the big games. :mad:
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 10:14:54 AM
It\'s not that they don\'t step up, it\'s they can\'t. They are just not that good, really.

As for the game goin on now, Packers vs Seahawks. My vote goes for Packers.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 04, 2004, 11:37:24 AM
well 13-6 halftime in favor of the pacs. i don\'t care too much for this game but would probably lean towards greenbay for the sentimental  reasons as far as farve goes..would be a great way to end the season winning the super-bowl for his pops.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 11:41:25 AM
Packer\'s own this game. There is no denying them. Now only if my Colt\'s win, then I\'ll be happy...

And as for Dallas, hell, Dallas isn\'t even the best team in Texas.
;)

(Loves that commercial)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 04, 2004, 12:40:53 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Packer\'s own this game. There is no denying them. Now only if my Colt\'s win, then I\'ll be happy...

And as for Dallas, hell, Dallas isn\'t even the best team in Texas.
;)

(Loves that commercial)



 screw you lic! ;) my team sucked the big one hard..but hopefully we\'ll be in better shape next year. i\'m not so sure what\'s gonna happen with the pac-hawk game it\'s tied up now. as for your colts..they should have an edge over denver..they\'ve been playin pretty well at home.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 01:14:06 PM
We\'re going to overtime, folks.

Anyone else catch Hassleback\'s commentary at the coin toss? He seems to be having a great time with this game and so does Farve. Great to see two great QB\'s (well, Hassleback isn\'t great yet, but has potenial) have so much fun playing the game.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 01:33:16 PM
Goodbye Seahawk\'s and hello Eagle\'s..

Matt Hassleback, "we want the ball and we\'re going to score"...Didn\'t he mean, "we want the ball and the Packer\'s are going to score"?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 04, 2004, 01:48:18 PM
Hah, I loved watching the Panthers chew up that overrated Cowboys defense and spit it out. Stephen Davis ran it down their throats, Quincy Carter still, and always will suck.

Get a new quarterback Dallas, and maybe I might spread a bit more optimism.

I\'m sad to see the Ravens out, I love watching that defense play. Ray Lewis is great to watch out there, but oh well, McNair can put on quite a show as well.

What an awesome playoff game at Lambeau... I couldn\'t have asked for a better game, maybe some snow would\'ve made it better, but Packers winning in OT was perfect. Seahawks have a strong squad and will be tough again next year most likely.

Now lets go Colts!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 02:03:22 PM
Seahawk\'s don\'t have a strong quad. Look at how passes was dropped this season on the Seahawk\'s. They really need to get a decent WR.

Hassleback could be a great QB if he got some good WR\'s.

As for the Raven\'s, goodbye and good riddance. They put on a game almost as boring as the Buc\'s.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 04, 2004, 02:05:33 PM
I dunno... It was a bad game for them... Koren Robinson, Darrell Jackson and Bobby Engram are one of the most dangerous trios in the NFL.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 02:09:48 PM
14-3, Colts.

Great play on Harrison\'s part. Makes an amazing catch, goes down, no one touches him, he realizes it and gets back up to score.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 02:32:06 PM
Touchdown, Marvin Harrison again.
Damn, the Colt\'s are on a roll
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 04, 2004, 02:51:54 PM
damn manning is whoopin that ass! another td! broncos better do something in tha 2nd half! this thing is outa control! :eek:
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 02:54:50 PM
It\'s over. I don\'t see no Denver come back, at this point all they can do is bend over and keep takin it up the a$$.

With that said.....[size=11] INTERCEPTION!!! [/size]
50 seconds on the clock and all three time outs. Let\'s go score again!


Good day so far.. My Packer\'s won and now Colt\'s are set to win.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 04, 2004, 03:39:37 PM
broncos are done. colts need to take one of their horsehoes off  and brand them.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 03:45:08 PM
Fumble, Bronco\'s, turns into 3pts. Manning needs one TD to tie a record with most TD passes in a single post-season game.  Stokely has a career high..The list goes on and on.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 04, 2004, 03:52:59 PM
Man Jake Plummer is stinking it up out there. Poor Broncos.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 04, 2004, 03:56:58 PM
Fumble, Indy!

Damnit! I wanted to see Manning tie the record with Steve Young. :)

The game is over. Now only three things remain.

(1) How bad can the Colt\'s make this look?

(2) How much better can the Bronco\'s make this look?

(3) Will Manning tie the record or set a new one?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 04, 2004, 04:03:42 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Fumble, Indy!

Damnit! I wanted to see Manning tie the record with Steve Young. :)

The game is over. Now only three things remain.

(1) How bad can the Colt\'s make this look?

(2) How much better can the Bronco\'s make this look?

(3) Will Manning tie the record or set a new one?



1. very
2. a lot
3. neither, I\'d pull him if I were the head coach

Also, it looks like Tennessee is headed up to New England, I hope that they shut them down.  KC\'s defense is no match for Indy\'s offense.

I smell a week 13 rematch between the Pats and the Colts in the AFC title game.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 04, 2004, 04:19:38 PM
New England over Tennessee
Indianapolis over Kansas City
=======================
New England over Indianapolis


Green Bay over Philadelphia
Carolina over St. Louis (my upset pick)
========================
Green Bay over Carolina

Superbowl:
Green Bay over New England
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 04, 2004, 04:25:18 PM
Green Bay will not leave Philadelphia alive.

Supernatural spirits or not, Philly is going to the superbowl, only to lose to my beloved pats of course.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 04, 2004, 04:56:31 PM
No way... Favre never goes down without a fight.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 04, 2004, 04:57:05 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
New England over Tennessee
Indianapolis over Kansas City
=======================
New England over Indianapolis


Green Bay over Philadelphia
Carolina over St. Louis (my upset pick)
========================
Green Bay over Carolina

Superbowl:
Green Bay over New England



  breaking all that down i simply say

  philadelphia vs colts  (superbowl)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: GmanJoe on January 04, 2004, 08:06:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
No way... Favre never goes down without a fight.


Depends. Sometimes he plays REALLY well....and sometimes he can be Mr. Oops Another Interception. He\'s known to force the ball into coverage....and causing serious heart attacks among Packer fans.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: square_marker on January 05, 2004, 12:34:34 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Goodbye Seahawk\'s and hello Eagle\'s..

Matt Hassleback, "we want the ball and we\'re going to score"...Didn\'t he mean, "we want the ball and the Packer\'s are going to score"?


Brett Favre has fun, Hassleback sounded like a kid in a candy store.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 05, 2004, 12:44:51 PM
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane

Also, it looks like Tennessee is headed up to New England, I hope that they shut them down.  KC\'s defense is no match for Indy\'s offense.

 


How quickly we forget last year.

New York Jets beat Indy at home 41-0 on Wild Card Weekend. The very next game, they go out to Oakland to face the AFC West Champs, and while they got built up to be untouchable, the comparisons about Pennington and Montana flying due to them dismantling a good Colts team, Oakland was preparing, and beat the Jets by 2 TD\'s I believe it was.

Now, the Colts beat a team 41-10 against a team that had previously beaten them 2 weeks ago. Everyone\'s touting Manning as the man that should\'ve gotten the entire MVP award (what IS a co-MVP, exactly, anyway?), and now we got people tryin\' to compare him to the record that Steve Young set in the Super Bowl. Meanwhile, the Chiefs are rested up, gettin\' players healthy, and preparing for a team that isn\'t much different from themselves.

Sound Familiar?

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 05, 2004, 04:03:04 PM
#1 passing attack vs. #29 defense... ouch...
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 05, 2004, 05:09:24 PM
Aren\'t they mainly the #29 defense because of piss poor run stoppage??  Oh wait, Indy hase Edge.  Carry on.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 05, 2004, 06:25:32 PM
Alright boys, here\'s the X Factor. Goes by the name of Mike Maslowski.

Chiefs Run Defense with Maz - 130 ypg
Chiefs Run Defense w/o Maz - 191 ypg

Keep in mind that Maz has been out since, welp, you guessed it, before the Broncos Dabacle in Denver. Now, what was the Chiefs Record with Maz, then, well, they\'re 11-1. Without Maz, they\'re 2-2, and looked awful in those two losses. I firmily believe that the Chiefs chances hinge on Maz\'s health going into the game.

As for the #1 Pass Offense vs. the #29 Defense...the Chiefs are in the middle of the pack as far as Pass Defense goes (19th I believe it is). Not saying a lot, but consider the fact that the Patriots only have the 16th best Pass Defense, and that\'s a bit of an argument. Coupled with the fact that the Chiefs obviously rely on Maz as part of the running game defensively, and the fact that the Chiefs have won 13 at home, and you have yourself an interesting game.

Oh, and uh, the Chiefs have a pretty good Offense the last time I checked, as well :)

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 05, 2004, 06:33:50 PM
Mike Masloski????

Is that the one eyed monster in Monsters Inc?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 05, 2004, 06:43:07 PM
Haha, no my friend, he would be the starting Middle Linebacker for the Kansas City Chiefs. The Best Defensive Player that NOBODY has heard of. Has the best motor on the Chiefs Defense, is probably the best defensive player we got overall.

You\'re goona find out who he is on Sunday, I can guarantee :)

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: IareEthan on January 05, 2004, 07:25:02 PM
Chiefs vs. Eagles in the superbowl

Eagles slipped up against San Fran, but they got the loss out of their system.  The longer the win streak, the closer you are to a loss, and New England is NOT ready to continue their streak against a series of GOOD teams.

By the way, how has Shawn Barber been treating you guys?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on January 05, 2004, 10:15:06 PM
GO GREENBAY!!!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 06, 2004, 03:53:06 AM
Quote
Originally posted by IareEthan
and New England is NOT ready to continue their streak against a series of GOOD teams.


If you don\'t consider Tennessee, Denver, Miami, Dallas, and Indianapolis good teams, what are?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 06, 2004, 05:52:55 AM
We have sorely missed Maz the past what..... 5 weeks or so.  He runs the defense, they look lost out there when he\'s not in his MLB position barking out commands to the defense.  For those not in the know, Maz had 162 tackles last year breaking the club record.

Chiefs are undefeated at home this year going up against one of the best road teams in the league.  A high scoring game would not surprise me.... neither would a Chiefs victory.


Where did all the bandwagon fans go now?


;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: unfocused on January 06, 2004, 09:13:18 AM
If the Chiefs are gonna win, its gonna be because of Priest Holmes and that OLine, not Mike Masloski.  Harrison>anybody on Chiefs defense
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 06, 2004, 12:54:50 PM
Thanks for stating the obvious, Scott (about Harrison).

Not sure if the Chiefs are dumb enough to fall for what Denver did last Sunday, but I already gave my case up for Maslowski. It\'s your choice to buy it or not, but I\'m telling you that he\'s the X Factor, the key to victory.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 06, 2004, 01:19:28 PM
word is he\'s not playing this week either.  I had no idea his knee was in such bad shape
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: unfocused on January 06, 2004, 10:24:44 PM
Edge to go for 150...:)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 07, 2004, 07:06:21 AM
my ass.... KC will break him like they did last time these teams met.  



(I say this, but I wish no injuries to anyone in this game)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 07, 2004, 11:14:56 AM
Joe freaking Gibbs...... who woulda thunk it
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 07, 2004, 12:57:48 PM
It looks like JB may be set up for the fall.

Damn..  It\'s going to be a great game.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: GmanJoe on January 07, 2004, 08:24:09 PM
Quote
Originally posted by JBean
Joe freaking Gibbs...... who woulda thunk it


He can turn things around....as long as Schnieder keeps his mouth shut.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 08, 2004, 10:31:35 AM
Well, if the Colts or Packers don\'t make it into the big game, I could care less.

With that said ...

Colts > KC
Packers > Eagles...maybe..That\'s a close one and a lot of it depends on \'Number 4\'.. If he has one of those days where he keeps throwing it up in tight coverage, causing picks, then the Packers are screwed.

I am hoping he plays a nice safe game. Don\'t go out on a limb, unless they have to.  Another thing is they need to establish the game early on. If they let the Eagles get started on them, it\'ll be hard to stop them.
\'


As for the Colt\'s / KC game. I really don\'t think KC can fix their defense in such a short time and the Colt\'s are red hot.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 08, 2004, 01:58:50 PM
Packers will beat the Eagles because they have a ground game, and the Eagles don\'t.

The End.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 08, 2004, 02:06:10 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
Packers will beat the Eagles because they have a ground game, and the Eagles don\'t.

The End.


Thanks a lot f**k-nut for jinxing the Packers. Everytime you say something in football, it goes the other way. Now we\'re gurantee\'d to lose...Thanks a lot f**k-nut.

;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 08, 2004, 02:07:41 PM
L-I-C will not die today.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 08, 2004, 03:17:11 PM
I agree.  Freestylah f\'d that up.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 08, 2004, 03:29:35 PM
Quote
Originally posted by videoholic
I agree.  Freestylah f\'d that up.


Thank you.
By all means, if you have a certain team you went in the Super Bowl, don\'t tell him.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: unfocused on January 08, 2004, 10:19:40 PM
hmm...hopes for the Swifdi magic to work on the Titans or Patriots...or Chiefs...or Rams, Panthers, Eagles.

Go all of the above mentioned teams!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 08, 2004, 10:20:51 PM
Whatever guys... I\'m sticking to Packers and Patriots in the Superbowl.

I have no idea why everyone thinks that I\'m always wrong, the only slip I had was saying the Cowboys wouldn\'t make the playoffs. And technically, the way they went out, they never really did.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 08, 2004, 10:53:39 PM
Oh my goodness...

Good bye Jim Mora Jr. Great defensive coordinator that really used the Niners speed to their advantage. It\'s a shame the secondary was banged up the whole year.

Falcons are lucky... Mora will fix that defense and holy crap will the Falcons be good next year.

EDIT: Oh and I\'m awaiting ROL Jamas response to Nebraska hiring Bill Callahan. :)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Weltall on January 09, 2004, 08:01:47 AM
Since my team didn\'t even make it, I\'m backing Philly for the trophy this year.

As long as the Pats and Titans lose, I\'ll be happy though.

I gotta say however, I believe and will believe until the day I die that the Pat\'s Super Bowl victory two years ago was illegitimate and obtained by cheating, but this year they definitely would deserve it if they got it. They are the most dominant team in the league.

Of course, that doesn\'t change the fact that I\'ll cheer for everyone who plays them :)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Bozco on January 09, 2004, 11:31:04 AM
Whats wrong with the Titans?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 09, 2004, 11:47:30 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Weltall

I gotta say however, I believe and will believe until the day I die that the Pat\'s Super Bowl victory two years ago was illegitimate and obtained by cheating,  



Welcome back Weltall..  You staying or just passing by?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 09, 2004, 01:35:42 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi


EDIT: Oh and I\'m awaiting ROL Jamas response to Nebraska hiring Bill Callahan. :)


Honestly you want my opinion?

I\'m excited :)

Callahan, before he left the College game to work under Gruden, was one of the best recruiters in the country for Barry Alvarez in Wisconsin. He was at the top in the NFL, goona make more at Nebraska than he did in Oakland, he\'s a passing guy, goona give us a new look, more athletes to the team, and frankly, we\'re goona kick a serious amount of ass in the future.

If we still use the running game like we usually do, we\'ll be in great shape. Coupled with a more efficient passing game, we\'re goona be a damn good football team.

The question is, how much of the staff is kept. People we need to keep -- Marvin Sanders, Jimmy Williams. I consider Bo Pelini and Turner Gill lost causes, because they\'ll never want to stay now that they haven\'t gotten the job, Pelini especially.

If he, at the very least, is able to keep Marvin Sanders, the Huskers\'ll be in great shape defensively. Could very well have one of the best Secondaries in the country over the next 2 years. Hell, almost had the best secondary in the country THIS year, and that was with 3 Sophomores starting (Josh and Daniel Bullocks, Fabian Washington)

The unrest in Oakland was caused by the Veterans. Whining because in Callahan\'s first year, he listened to their every whim and essentially gave them control of the team. Second year, he wanted more control, and got bitched at by the old guys for it. There are egos in College Football, but none the size of some of the players in Oakland.

Honestly, it\'s a great fit for the Huskers.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 09, 2004, 01:47:08 PM
Brilliant. Good response.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: theomen on January 09, 2004, 06:23:00 PM
Mora gone = me sad...
Mora and his defense was one of the only bright spots we had all year.  Well maybe Monte Kiffin will get fired in TB and come to the Bay.  If he does I\'ll give him a reach around.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 09, 2004, 08:51:03 PM
If Monte Kiffin ever got fired, I can bet you that Bill Callahan\'d give him a good look at Nebraska :)

Think about it, it Kiffin got fired, he\'d be going back to his home state, his alma mater, where he became a defensive genius with the Huskers in the early 70\'s and won National Titles, and he\'d also be going to Callahan, who he knows because he coached against him in a Super Bowl, and Kiffin actually shut him down pretty good in that game, obviously.

Kiffin gets fired, becomes Nebraska\'s Defensive Coordinator...mmm, good stuff :)

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 09, 2004, 09:54:22 PM
Man I\'m already bored with Dennis Erickson.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: theomen on January 09, 2004, 10:10:30 PM
I\'m real low on D-eck, but I figure give him another year.  If he loses next year, well then send his ass back to the everglades.  Though, if the Niners could get their hands on a proven winner like Holmgren then give Eck the boot.  However, it\'s not bloody likely.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on January 09, 2004, 10:55:02 PM
Funny James, before the hiring you were saying "Callahan, get out of my damn state!" every day he was being interviewed, and we were arguing about whose team should have to be stuck with him.  Go looking for something good after it happened? :p
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: theomen on January 09, 2004, 10:58:32 PM
And after KC get\'s slaughtered he\'ll come in here and say how it\'ll make them tougher and they\'ll do what Denver did after being beat at home in the Playoffs, and win back-to-back titles.  ;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Weltall on January 09, 2004, 11:48:58 PM
Quote
Originally posted by videoholic
Welcome back Weltall..  You staying or just passing by?


I dunno yet. Stay tuned.

I think I\'ll return to a slight level of activity. If I don\'t get bored.

Edit: Ah yeah, it has been two years. Got any recent pictures of Big Log?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 10, 2004, 08:59:07 AM
posted one a month ago..

Here ya go.

http://www.psx2central.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=31915&highlight=tiger
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Weltall on January 10, 2004, 12:02:12 PM
Haha, cute kid.

Offer up a good dowry and when I have my daughter, we can marry them off together.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 10, 2004, 12:18:59 PM
He\'s got good seed.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 10, 2004, 01:17:29 PM
Carolina over St. Louis (if anyone cares).

I just hate the fact I\'ll miss both games tommorw, due to work!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Jumpman on January 10, 2004, 02:04:21 PM
You should make him post, Vid. Pick a topic and let him mash the keys.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 10, 2004, 03:18:53 PM
Excuse me, is this a playoff game? Someone let the two teams know, so that they can make this exciting, because as it stands, this is so boring that I think I would rather just take some tyenol PM and catch the highlights in the mornin\' .
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 10, 2004, 03:55:55 PM
As long as the rams lose I am happy:)
Warner>>>Rams
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 10, 2004, 04:01:35 PM
:laughing: :laughing: :laughing: Bulger throws another INT.
Now he is 22-23 they get what they got coming.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 10, 2004, 04:16:53 PM
Man bulger just threw another INT:laughing: I don\'t know if they gone put Warner in. If I was him I wouldn\'t even play. Let them and there savior die tonite.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Jumpman on January 10, 2004, 05:23:32 PM
Someone threw an interception with 1 minute left in OT. Wtg!

Carolina won. Woot?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 11, 2004, 12:23:25 AM
Man today\'s games rocked. Double overtime and the Rams lose, and then a field goal to decide the winner between the Pats and Titans.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 11, 2004, 06:35:51 AM
Pats win!!! Pats win!!!

Bring on Indianapolis/Kansas City!!!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 11, 2004, 07:00:08 AM
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
Pats win!!! Pats win!!!

Bring on Indianapolis/Kansas City!!!

\'


Colts over Kansas

I won\'t predict the Packers / Eagles game.

Oh and Colts over Patriots.
:D
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 11, 2004, 10:36:10 AM
This is pathetic.

Could very well be the worst defensively played quarter I\'ve seen in a long time. It\'s like they\'re not even trying.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 11, 2004, 02:22:14 PM
Alright, line up all the dissapointed Chief fans.

Let me say one thing, not to take away from the Chief\'s great season this year, but it was nowhere near as good as people portrayed it. Take for example, New England was doing better than Chiefs and who got the attention? The Chiefs. Why? Dante Hall. If it had not been for Dante Hall\'s kick returns earlier this season, most people would of ignored the Chief\'s, as usual. Now their season has come to an end and all the \'bandwagon fans\' are confused and dissapointed.


I\'ll wait on my gloating about how the Colt\'s have made it further than Vid figured they would, I don\'t want to jinx them for the next big game.
:D
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 11, 2004, 02:44:45 PM
I picked Indy to beat KC easily, we\'ll it wasn\'t easy, but they won.

I also picked New England to beat Indy, which they will.  Whilst on the NFC side of the playoffs I\'m not doing to well with picks.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 11, 2004, 03:31:57 PM
It was easy enough.

The fact that the Chiefs Defense was the worst it could have possibly been was one thing, but the Chiefs Offense fought back every punch that Peyton Manning and company threw.

If you look at the final stats, you\'ll see that the Chiefs were right there in yardage with the Colts, and they had to be. If not for a dropped pass on by by Johnnie "The Virus" Morton on a 3rd and 5 at the 15, coupled with a missed 32 yard FG by Morten Andersen right after that (his first miss under 39 this year from what I remember), the Chiefs stayed stride for stride with them. Also didn\'t help that Priest Holmes opened up the 2nd half with a huge run, only to have his 2nd fumble in his last 410 touches at the end of the run.

And, of course, to end the post bitching, the Refs didn\'t help us either. Chiefs couldn\'t buy a call when it was obvious, and the Colts got them at just the right time, of course.

38-31...Greg Robinson should be shot in the face.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 11, 2004, 05:14:38 PM
Hehe... Green Bay did lose.

Man I rock.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 11, 2004, 06:38:57 PM
well, Swifdi is out of it in terms of picking the right teams...

Carolina vs. New England
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 11, 2004, 06:55:44 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
Hehe... Green Bay did lose.

Man I rock.


Yeah I was ruttin for mcnab. It\'s about there time.



p.s If there is a worst place than hell you\'ll get there with that pic.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on January 11, 2004, 07:02:01 PM
GRR...I hope the Panthers give an ass whuppin to the Eagles.

Damn Favre gave away that game...wth throwing the ball down the field. Go Panthers!!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 11, 2004, 07:15:49 PM
Quote
Originally posted by QuDDus




p.s If there is a worst place than hell you\'ll get there with that pic.


Dude, what are you talking about? I\'m a Christian, this picture is awesome. Lighten up.

Oh, and go niners?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 11, 2004, 07:21:33 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
 New England was doing better than Chiefs and who got the attention? The Chiefs. Why? Dante Hall. If it had not been for Dante Hall\'s kick returns earlier this season, most people would of ignored the Chief\'s, as usual. Now their season has come to an end and all the \'bandwagon fans\' are confused and dissapointed.
:D




Um, Priest Holmes isn\'t so bad.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: IareEthan on January 11, 2004, 07:24:01 PM
I really think this is the year of the Eagles.

I think Greenbay was/will be Philadelphia\'s toughest challenge in the post season.  Green Bay\'s been playing awesome football, have a great ground attack and an explosive passing game coupled with a pretty good defense.  With Carolina, I think you\'ve got a good run game with good defense, but the Eagles will be able to focus in on the run more so than against green bay, especially if Vincent\'s back.  But when it gets to the AFC, the way Indy\'s playing, that offense is going to be tough to stop.

And yes, I think Indy will beat New England.  Handily.

Seriously though...how are the Eagles doing it?  They\'ve had so many injuries, in so many key places (their best defensive/offensive players out for the playoffs...their best corner sitting out this game...the D-line completely banged up), but they keep winning.  Hello, Houston.

Eagles over Indy in the Super Bowl
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 11, 2004, 07:25:53 PM
I pretty much everyone except the Patriots to win it at this point. I dunno, the Pats seem to be the favorite and everyone else is looking like underdogs.

I\'m totally for Carolina though, they\'ve been surprising.

And because I stated that, they\'ll lose to the Eagles. And because I mentioned the Eagles, they\'ll lose to the Pats, so I\'m screwed either way.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 11, 2004, 07:41:30 PM
Eagles will find a way to lose next week.  They always do.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on January 11, 2004, 10:08:00 PM
^^^

Hopefully, I don\'t know why I can\'t stand Mcnabb\'s mom.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 11, 2004, 10:15:01 PM
uhhh.... that game killed me.  I came so close to throwing my beer bottle at my TV so many times.  If we don\'t get a new defensive coordinator next season all hope is lost for us to do anything next year.  :(
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 12, 2004, 03:42:25 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
I dunno, the Pats seem to be the favorite and everyone else is looking like underdogs.


You gotta be kidding me.  Indy will be favored this weekend.  The Pats never get respect.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 12, 2004, 06:11:47 AM
It\'s okay Hurricane, they\'re my favorite. :)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 12, 2004, 06:24:29 AM
Pat\'s will lose. Close. High scoring game.

Eagles may find a way to lose, I doubt it tho.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: unfocused on January 12, 2004, 09:35:14 AM
Pats are favored by 3.5 I heard...

The KC and Indy game wasn\'t as close as the final score and the stats show.  If it wasn\'t for that Dante Hall KR the game would\'ve been a rout.

Also don\'t put all of the blame of the Packers loss on Favre...hes not the one who gave up a 4th and 26.  I can\'t believe they let them have that after blitzing McNabb so successfully on the plays just prior that 4th down.  They didn\'t blitz any LBs and consequently McNabb didn\'t have to rush his throw at all giving Mitchell time to get down the field.

btw...Im glad Swifdi didn\'t mention the Colts in that long rant of his, maybe they\'ll find a way to win in arctic New England this week.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 12, 2004, 10:42:55 AM
Give me a break.

It\'s 4th and 1. You try to draw them offsides, doesn\'t work. You try again. Doesn\'t work. You let the play clock run out. Why not just run a QB sneak? Good griefs....Now you\'re 4th and 6. Punt the bal.. Go into OT, then Farve does one of his famous "I hope this works" catches (which by the way, I said in an earlier post, would make or break the game) and throws it , without looking, into double coverage.

Hello? Thanks, Farve.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 12, 2004, 01:09:11 PM
Quote
Originally posted by unfocused
Pats are favored by 3.5 I heard...

The KC and Indy game wasn\'t as close as the final score and the stats show.  If it wasn\'t for that Dante Hall KR the game would\'ve been a rout.
 


...What?

Surely you\'re kidding. The Colts Defense wasn\'t exactly stopping the Chiefs, either. Even if Dante Hall doesn\'t take that return back, the Chiefs prolly would\'ve scored anyway.

Truth be told, the Chiefs defense was terrible, and Johnnie Morton is a virus. That\'s all there really is to say about that. Epitomy of the season.

Oh, and like I said before, Maz would be the X Factor in the game...he didn\'t play, Chiefs gave up 38 points and didn\'t stop the Colts the entire game.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 12, 2004, 01:17:30 PM
that Chiefs / Colts game was close as hell stats wise.  Lookie here to see for yourself...

http://www.superbowl.com/gamecenter/teamstats/NFL_20040111_IND@KC

cool pic.... wait till next year :nerd:
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nfl.com%2Fu%2Fsuperbowl%2Fphotos%2Fsuperbowl536_lower.jpg&hash=998522a1e63966e1293610495dacaaf4a8b5246f)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 12, 2004, 01:56:36 PM
Haha... it looks photoshopped almost... Guy has some serious hops.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: unfocused on January 12, 2004, 07:49:02 PM
he looks like he has wires holding him up...I wish Edgerrin would\'ve done that against the Pats a few weeks back, we might be watching the AFC Championship from the RCA Dome this week...
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 13, 2004, 02:14:30 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
Dude, what are you talking about? I\'m a Christian, this picture is awesome. Lighten up.

Oh, and go niners?


obviously I was joking:rolleyes: What are you feeling guilty???
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 13, 2004, 06:00:38 AM
1. It wasn\'t obvious.
2. How did that come across as sounding guilty? I\'m not ashamed over a picture.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on January 14, 2004, 10:28:34 PM
http://www.sf49ers.com/newsroom/DisplayNews.asp?newsid=1678

Very disapointing news. He\'s a great QB and his ass had better not start slipping now.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 14, 2004, 11:34:15 PM
Crap.... Man that sucks, Garcia seemed like a clean cut guy.

I dunno though, he\'s done a lot statistically but he\'s yet to rally this team deep into the playoffs.

And I\'m looking over his shoulder at Rattay... We know Rattay has an arm.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 15, 2004, 11:37:57 AM
here\'s Garcia hunched over in the backseat of a car after being released from Jail

(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fespn-att.starwave.com%2Fmedia%2Fnfl%2F2004%2F0114%2Fphoto%2Fa_garcia_hi.jpg&hash=93af38b91d1fe373d961c9fd1670f8798e74901b)

:laughing:    :ghey:     :wned:
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 15, 2004, 12:05:14 PM
Whoa... that is totally :ghey:
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 16, 2004, 09:29:44 PM
All I know is this..

I have to work Sunday, won\'t catch the Colts/Patriots game.

Gracia doesn\'t have another season in him at this rate. Last season was terrible and Rattay is ready for the prime time.

Panthers will lose.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 17, 2004, 02:57:52 PM
All I know is this..

I managed to get off and will watch the COLTS / PATRIOTS game.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 17, 2004, 04:29:56 PM
All I know is this..  I know where the freaking Edit button is.  :)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 17, 2004, 04:56:35 PM
Is that a not so subtle hint?
:)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: unfocused on January 17, 2004, 05:33:04 PM
Im gonna miss the first two hours of the game due to work, Im sure they\'ll have it on though.  At least on one of the TVs.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 18, 2004, 10:50:48 AM
Uhm.

Go Panthers. Mike Rucker and Mike Minter > The rest of the playoffs. Yes, that\'s right.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 10:55:20 AM
Quote
Originally posted by ROL Jamas
Uhm.

Go Panthers. Mike Rucker and Mike Minter > The rest of the playoffs. Yes, that\'s right.

See Yuz.


I don\'t forsee the Panthers winning, but Philly usually messes up and chokes around this time, not to mention their last games have been close...
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on January 18, 2004, 11:40:39 AM
Offense wins games, defense wins championships.  That\'s what they say, right?

Panthers have a strong D.  Eagles don\'t.  This is a championship game.

Oh, and John Fox knows how to beat the Eagles better than anyway.

Panthers win.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 18, 2004, 11:51:51 AM
Well I talk to mama mcnab and she told I have nothing to worry about.

I can guarantee that mcnab and the eagles will not choke this time it is philly time to shine. Philly all the way baby........
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 12:23:27 PM
I refuse to jump on the Philly bandwagon.

What are the Colt\'s doing defense wise? They gave up way to many 1st downs.

Interception?!?!?! Good, God no!

Super Bowl Suck -> Philly vs New England.

Blah!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 18, 2004, 12:50:33 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
I refuse to jump on the Philly bandwagon.

What are the Colt\'s doing defense wise? They gave up way to many 1st downs.

Interception?!?!?! Good, God no!

Super Bowl Suck -> Philly vs New England.

Blah!


Damn your given up already? There is another whole other half of play left for the colts. And we are only just over 5 minutes in the 2nd qtr.  I would hate to see them win now that you\'ve ritten them off.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 12:56:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by QuDDus
Damn your given up already? There is another whole other half of play left for the colts. And we are only just over 5 minutes in the 2nd qtr.  I would hate to see them win now that you\'ve ritten them off.


I\'m realisitic. The team who gets goin\', scores the most points from the start, usually wins the game. The Colts are not a come back team. They are a team that comes out , dominates . It isn\'t happening. Our defense isn\'t stopping New England. The list goes on and on. Without a miracle, we have lost.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Capcom on January 18, 2004, 01:09:57 PM
The safety is not a good sign of things to come.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 01:12:14 PM
HA HA!
Fumble...Thank god, we got the ball finally.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 18, 2004, 01:18:56 PM
fumble..............colts lose the ball. I still not given up hope on the colts though. But man it doesn\'t look good.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 01:24:16 PM
Quote
Originally posted by QuDDus
fumble..............colts lose the ball. I still not given up hope on the colts though. But man it doesn\'t look good.


There\'s a diference in coming back against a team in a normal game...And coming back against a 15 point lead, bad weather, a team that you always suffer against.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 18, 2004, 01:34:01 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
There\'s a diference in coming back against a team in a normal game...And coming back against a 15 point lead, bad weather, a team that you always suffer against.


True I just hate tom brady and the pats they are just too way overratted. And I think payton has been playing his ass off in the nfl and I think he deserves to win.

The one pass harrison has gotten all day and he drops it...damn

I am still hoping for a better second half.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 01:40:38 PM
Quote
Originally posted by QuDDus
True I just hate tom brady and the pats they are just too way overratted. And I think payton has been playing his ass off in the nfl and I think he deserves to win.

The one pass harrison has gotten all day and he drops it...damn

I am still hoping for a better second half.


I know the feeling.
I can\'t stand Brady or the Patriots. They rank up there with the Bucs, on my most hated list.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 02:14:06 PM
Well, we lost. Another intercepetion by Ty Law. We are two TD\'s down, and England is about to score again.

Ugh. Looks like another craptacular super-bowl (just slightly better than last year\'s disgrace of a super bowl).
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Jumpman on January 18, 2004, 02:59:50 PM
I predict the Pats will win someone give me money now.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 03:08:26 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Jumpman
I predict the Pats will win someone give me money now.


I predict that I dislike you, at this point.
:mad:

One thing is for sure, I won\'t bother watching the friggin\' Superbowl. I cannot stand New England . As for the next game, could care less who wins that.

{watches Superbowl ratings continue to drop}
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 18, 2004, 04:32:00 PM
Now, you wouldn\'t happen to be a little biased, no?

A Defensive AFC Team vs. what will most likely be a Defensive NFC team (really can\'t be anything else). Who doesn\'t wan to see the Eagles or the Panthers go? The Patriots earned their trip, you shouldn\'t be complaining, considering they whooped up on the Colts and their offense.

Bout time Peyton Manning got what he deserved...just took 2 weeks too long.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 04:39:59 PM
Quote
Originally posted by ROL Jamas
Now, you wouldn\'t happen to be a little biased, no?

A Defensive AFC Team vs. what will most likely be a Defensive NFC team (really can\'t be anything else). Who doesn\'t wan to see the Eagles or the Panthers go? The Patriots earned their trip, you shouldn\'t be complaining, considering they whooped up on the Colts and their offense.

Bout time Peyton Manning got what he deserved...just took 2 weeks too long.

See Yuz.



Did we watch the same game? You know, the game where the REF\'s was f**kin\' idiots. There was stuff un-called on both sides.. Holding on Patriots offense, playclock ran out on Colts offense, the list goes on and on. Would the Pariots won , if the Ref\'s would of called those ? Most likely, due to the 4Int\'s. But for a Conference game, this REF\'s was horrible and it favored the Patriots all the way.

As for who doesn\'t want to see the Eagles go or Panthers? Me. Both teams suck, in my opinion. They just suck less than the numbnuts Patriots.

With all that said, the NFL and Ref\'s continued to keep their head in their asses in big games.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 18, 2004, 05:11:55 PM
I would love to see the Panthers win their first Superbowl. Besides I hate the AFC. :)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 05:16:14 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
I would love to see the Panthers win their first Superbowl. Besides I hate the AFC. :)


I don\'t care who wins this game, but the late hit on Mcnabb that was not called is a disgrace . In today\'s age of protesting the QB, not calling that late hit is just downright terrible.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 06:45:02 PM
Panther\'s go on to win the game. Goin\' to Huston for Superbowl 38 against the Patriots.

What a day for upsets.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 18, 2004, 06:58:15 PM
I picked the Pats to the superbowl... Only thing I misfired was the Panthers making it, although I did mention they were a likely candidate :) .
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 07:07:24 PM
I have nicknamed Superbowl 38...

Super Bowl SUCK

Two years in a row, two teams that in my opinion, suck, are in the Superbowl.
Oh well, can\'t have everything.

;)

...calls work and cancels my day off for the Superbowl
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on January 18, 2004, 07:15:54 PM
HAHAHAHAHA...GO PANTHERS!!!!!

What now McNabb?!?!

PANTHERS SUPERBOWL CHAMPS.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 07:21:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SirMystiq
HAHAHAHAHA...GO PANTHERS!!!!!

What now McNabb?!?!

PANTHERS SUPERBOWL CHAMPS.


Abit early, eh?

And you cannot lay all the blame on McNabb. The Eagles receivers was dropping the balls, thus lowering McNabb\'s confindence in his receivers.  Then you take in the fact that McNabb kept getting banged up, he should of been taken out of the game earlier. Him being hurt , getting banged up even more, only killed his motivation, he wasn\'t able to move forward, throw the ball.  It\'s unfair to lay all the blame on McNabb.

Will the Panther\'s beat the Patriots? It\'s hard to say. They have been the underdogs from the start of the season. No one thought they would be a playoff team and then no one thought they would beat the Eagles and win the NFC. Now they\'ve done both, moved onto the Superbowl, once again, as the underdogs. They\'re comfortable with that situation.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 18, 2004, 08:07:18 PM
I love how you hate the Patriots.  As far as I\'m concerned, Tom Brady is still an under-rated quaterback.

Tom Brady = undefeated in playoffs

If the Patriots suck than the Colts don\'t even belong in the NFL.  You set your standards way too high man, 14 wins in a row isn\'t something you see in the NFL these days.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 08:42:09 PM
I didn\'t say that the Patriots was a terrible team. I said, in my opinion they are. I cannot stand the Patriots. There is not one single person on that team, that I like. They make for boring football. Just like the Buc\'s make for boring football. Thus, I cannot stand either team.

The Colts, Packers, 49\'ers and other teams make exciting games, unlike the Patriots.

Do you know why Tom Brady is "under-rated"? It\'s because he does nothing to get noticed. He doesn\'t make big plays. No one on the team does. They are a good team, they\'re just a boring team. Boring teams suck. The entire Patriot team could die in a plane wreck and the plane wreck would still be...boring.

(abit drastic, but you get the point)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: theomen on January 18, 2004, 10:11:03 PM
Tom Brady is a handsome man
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 18, 2004, 10:15:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by theomen
Tom Brady is a handsome man


You Sir, are gay.
:D
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 19, 2004, 05:23:15 AM
he may not make flashy plays like McNair or Manning, but he has the winningest record amongst active QBs.  That\'s the most important stat in my opinion.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 19, 2004, 06:15:53 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
I don\'t care who wins this game, but the late hit on Mcnabb that was not called is a disgrace . In today\'s age of protesting the QB, not calling that late hit is just downright terrible.


The guy didn\'t think McNabb was down by contact, so what else was he supposed to do?  

Oh yeah.......




GO PANTHERS!!!  :bounce:
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on January 19, 2004, 08:04:58 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Did we watch the same game? You know, the game where the REF\'s was f**kin\' idiots. There was stuff un-called on both sides.. Holding on Patriots offense, playclock ran out on Colts offense, the list goes on and on. Would the Pariots won , if the Ref\'s would of called those ? Most likely, due to the 4Int\'s. But for a Conference game, this REF\'s was horrible and it favored the Patriots all the way.

As for who doesn\'t want to see the Eagles go or Panthers? Me. Both teams suck, in my opinion. They just suck less than the numbnuts Patriots.

With all that said, the NFL and Ref\'s continued to keep their head in their asses in big games.


No Colts fan has any right to cry about their game yesterday. After the game against the Chiefs, I was surprised that you weren\'t getting every single damn call.

Oh, are you actually complaining about the hit that McNabb took that you just so happened to THINK was late? What about the hit where Trent Green was sliding, already on the ground, and your boy Dwight Freeney gives him a helmet to helmet shot on the GROUND? Wasn\'t called, either.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 19, 2004, 10:37:56 AM
Blah. Blah. Blah.
That\'s all I saw out of your post Jamas.

It\'s this simple.
The REF\'s sucked ass on both games. For conference championship games, there should be better REF\'s and calls.
I was not crying because the Colt\'s lost, they lost because Manning throws picks. But they could of had a more interesting games if some of those holding calls, would of been actually CALLED.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Black Samurai on January 19, 2004, 10:48:18 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
They make for boring football. Just like the Buc\'s make for boring football. Thus, I cannot stand either team.

The Colts, Packers, 49\'ers and other teams make exciting games, unlike the Patriots.
LIC\'s Football credibility = non existent. Only women and bandwagon fans complain about low scoring games. The only people who don\'t find a really good defense exciting are fans of the other team.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 19, 2004, 10:56:39 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
LIC\'s Football credibility = non existent. Only women and bandwagon fans complain about low scoring games. The only people who don\'t find a really good defense exciting are fans of the other team.



Oh hush.
There is no fun in watching teams punt the ball back and forth. Football and other sports are suppose to be exciting. Partriots and Buc\'s never have exciting games. If it wasn\'t for TY Law, that game would of put me and most viewers to sleep.

Did I complain about Carolina and Eagles? No. That was a low scoring game. Why did I not complain? It was half way interesting.

I don\'t require a high scoring game to be interested. I do require the teams actually looking alive. Not like robots and that is what the Patriots and Buc\'s remind me of. Robots. They go out there. They execute (well Partriots more so than Bucs) and that is fine. It\'s just boring. The team rarely shows any emotion in the game.

As for the comment about a good defense. No, that\'s fine. The Colt\'s lost to the better team. Patriots defense dominated the Colt\'s offense and they kept Manning in a panic, something he is not used to. That\'s fine. It still doesn\'t change the fact that there was a lot of missed calls on BOTH sides. Holding? Not called. Play clock running out (on the COLTS) ? Not called. List goes on and on.  Those are all crucial calls that could of made the game more interesting.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Black Samurai on January 19, 2004, 11:39:41 AM
No you are salty about your team losing and trying to not show you are salty by bringing up a bullshit no-call on delay of game. Weren\'t the Colt intercepted on that drive anyway?

You said that Brady is overrated. That right there is bullshit. Brady is a winner. Where would Manning\'s stats be if he didn\'t have Harrison and Edge? Somewhere in the Brady area. If you take away Harrison you take away the Colts offense(which the Pat\'s showed last night). Manning is overrated. I would rather have a QB that has above average stats and wins(Montana/Brady) than a QB who has great stats and does nothing(Marino/Manning). The best winning percentage among active QB\'s and no losses in overtime or the postseason doesn\'t lie.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 19, 2004, 11:49:48 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
No you are salty about your team losing and trying to not show you are salty by bringing up a bullshit no-call on delay of game. Weren\'t the Colt intercepted on that drive anyway?

You said that Brady is overrated. That right there is bullshit. Brady is a winner. Where would Manning\'s stats be if he didn\'t have Harrison and Edge? Somewhere in the Brady area. If you take away Harrison you take away the Colts offense(which the Pat\'s showed last night). Manning is overrated. I would rather have a QB that has above average stats and wins(Montana/Brady) than a QB who has great stats and does nothing(Marino/Manning). The best winning percentage among active QB\'s and no losses in overtime or the postseason doesn\'t lie.


Give me a f**kin\' break. I am not salty about the Colt\'s losing. They lost to the better team. I just think the Ref\'s are friggin\' idiots. They was bad also in the other game, on the late hit on McNabb.  

I\'m not sure how you people blown this out of porportion. It\'s simple. Patriots won. Better team (tho I personally cannot stand them or the Bucs). There was a lot of no-call\'s, that would of made the game more interesting. Would the Colt\'s have won? Hell no. They didn\'t play worth shit yesterday and the Partiots had their number on every play.

So, give me a friggin\' break. My complaint has been simple. There was a lot of no-calls on both sides. The Colt\'s would of still lost , but it would of made the game more interesting, instead of the snooze-fest that it was.


My dislike for the Patriots has nothing to do with the Colt\'s. I have never liked the Patriots. I didn\'t like them two years ago when they went to the Superbowl. Guess what? I still don\'t like them. Did they earn their spot? Yes. They won the most games and they done that by playing the best games. It still doesn\'t change my mind on the team. They\'re extremely boring, in my opinion.

POINT: In a Conference Championship game, there is no excuse for things not being called. It is extremely vital for BOTH teams.

Now do me a favor, read over the post. Grasp it.
:D
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 19, 2004, 12:16:02 PM
the thing is, I like most people don\'t want a playoff game decided by a referee\'s call.  When playoff time rolls around officals have a habit of "letting them play" and only calling the harshest and blatant penalties.  

In reality, refs could call a penalty on nearly every play of every game.... how fun would that be?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 19, 2004, 12:23:41 PM
Quote
Originally posted by JBean
the thing is, I like most people don\'t want a playoff game decided by a referee\'s call.  When playoff time rolls around officals have a habit of "letting them play" and only calling the harshest and blatant penalties.  

In reality, refs could call a penalty on nearly every play of every game.... how fun would that be?


No offense, but that\'s ignorant.
In such a crucial game, calls should be made. There should not be exceptions for either team.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on January 19, 2004, 12:26:38 PM
not ignorant at all, it\'s kinda well known that refs don\'t make nearly as many calls in the postseason as they do in regular season play.

Good coaches and players are keen to this.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Black Samurai on January 19, 2004, 12:31:12 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
My dislike for the Patriots has nothing to do with the Colt\'s. I have never liked the Patriots.
Boooo, whatever. Like someone could just dislike a team for any other reason besides losing to them.

*looks nervously at his "Yankees Suck" shirt and his anti Jets/Lakers/Knicks banners. :(
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 19, 2004, 12:38:55 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
Boooo, whatever. Like someone could just dislike a team for any other reason besides losing to them.

*looks nervously at his "Yankees Suck" shirt and his anti Jets/Lakers/Knicks banners. :(



:D

Yes, it\'s possible to dislike a team other than losing to them. They bore me to tears. I prefer my games exciting.  I\'ve never argued that the Patriots are the better team. I know they are. But it doesn\'t make them like them - that would be jumpin\' on the bandwagon .
:D
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 19, 2004, 01:10:58 PM
prediction

 panthers 17 pats 13

i know the pats are favored in this one but i didn\'t think phili. would lose to the panthers,.. my team dallas is out and i\'m not a fan of the pats so go panthers.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on January 19, 2004, 04:12:23 PM
Hmm...Well most of the talk was about McNabb. McNabb this...McNabb that...all the Eagle\'s fans talk about how incredibly good the guy is...yeah, unless he is rushed, then sacked, and gets hurt. Eagles without McNabb = The Cowboys

I think the Panther will beat the Pats. The Pats are a good team, but the Panthers DL looks to quick and Brady is going to end up like McNabb.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 22, 2004, 01:45:42 PM
Phili blows.  They shouldn\'t have beaten Green Bay.

It should be a good game.  NE is on a roll, but not having the weather to help them out will make it interesting.

Hopefully Carolina will take it home.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 26, 2004, 02:08:16 AM
Quote

The competition committee is expected to take a look at officials becoming flag-shy in the postseason. Judging by the defensive game plans of New England\'s Bill Belichick and Carolina\'s John Fox in the AFC and NFC championship games, coaches obviously are anticipating officials allowing more physical play in the playoffs. After the fact, the league office quietly admitted that Walt Coleman\'s crew missed six calls against the Patriots in the AFC championship game, including a defensive holding on third down with 1:51 remaining in the game, and a pass interference on the subsequent fourth down[/size]. The Patriots led 21-14 at the time. The victim on both non-calls was Colts TE Marcus Pollard. Officials also admit holding by Patriots G Joe Andruzzi on Colts DE Robert Mathis was missed on a fourth-and-9 that the Patriots converted in the second quarter. The Patriots ended the drive with a field goal for a 13-0 lead. . . .


From sports.yahoo.com
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 26, 2004, 03:53:44 AM
God, let the players freaking play.  If your relying on a penalty to change the game that\'s sad.  Trust me, if they had called them, I would be pissed no doubt, but god, it\'s a football game, its meant to be rough.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: IareEthan on January 26, 2004, 09:42:22 AM
That\'s easy to say because your team was benefitting from the missed calls.

Rules are rules.  If they\'re broken, penalties are in order.

I know some say, it\'s a given that officials let more slide in the playoffs.  It should be just the opposite.  They should crack down if you ask me.  The teams that get to the playoffs generally get there because they\'re good teams, and part of being a good team is knowing discipline.  If one team comes into a game LACKING that discipline...why should the other team have to pay for it?

When the Pats won the superbowl there was a large group of people who didn\'t consider them champions (myself included) because of the Raiders game, and the fact they walked out of that game victorious through a BS call.

Same may be said this year.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 26, 2004, 10:33:21 AM
I hate the pats more than I hate the buccs if that is possible, but the colts have no defense and that is why the lost game.

You can\'t rely on all calls to win you games. If you stop on defense and convert plays you win. The colts started out being crushed on defense and that is why they lost.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 26, 2004, 01:48:07 PM
I don\'t have any clue how some of you can "hate" the Pats. They seem to be the most blue-collared football team out there.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on January 26, 2004, 02:38:17 PM
How are they more so than the Panthers?

And I hate the Pats.  There are a bunch of reasons.  As a Jets fan I really dislike Belichick.  I also do not like the team much anyway as a Jets fan.  Plus people generally don\'t like the favorites.  A 14 game win streak makes them that.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on January 26, 2004, 03:01:21 PM
Thats the thing, Panthers are another blue collared team. They both play clean football with great defense. I hope the Panthers win though because they\'re the underdog.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on January 26, 2004, 05:15:34 PM
Quote
Originally posted by IareEthan
(1)That\'s easy to say because your team was benefitting from the missed calls.

(2)Rules are rules.  If they\'re broken, penalties are in order.

(3)When the Pats won the superbowl there was a large group of people who didn\'t consider them champions (myself included) because of the Raiders game, and the fact they walked out of that game victorious through a BS call.


(1) Yes, but I admitted that if the penalties had been called that I would be pissed, maybe even bitch a little, but the Colts shouldn\'t be relying on a penalty to get them back into the game.

(2) Rules are rules, yes, than if you feel that way than you shouldn\'t be arguing about the Oakland game.  There\'s a thing called a "tuck rule", and gosh darnit, the officials were going by the rules, so the correct call was made.

I don\'t know what point your trying to make here, first you say rules are rules, than you say that the tuck rule is stupid, man, make up your mind.

(3) Yeah, maybe YOU don\'t consider them champions, but that has no substance behind it.  I could say I don\'t like the Yankees(a fact), I don\'t consider them 26x champions(eh, I wish). That\'s great, but their in the record books for Superbowl XXXVI, and Tom Brady was the MVP, end of story.

Finally, on a personal note, I feel the league is getting way to soft with these "protect the players" crap.  My feeling is let them play the game.  Sometimes you get the calls, and sometimes you don\'t, it\'s your right to complain.  My problem is that your being so god damned two-faced about it trying to devalue a team that has made it to the Superbowl 2 out of the past 3 years.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on January 27, 2004, 05:45:55 AM
Give it a break, Hurricane. Your whole argument is let the players play and how IF a play would of been called, you\'d be pissed. Guess what? A pentatlies wasn\'t called. Rules was broken. Which, in my opinion, diminishes the Pat\'s victory over the Colts. Yes, the Colts would of still lost, they played terrible, but the Pat\'s was also breaking rule after rule and getting away with it.

I gurantee if Tony Dungy would of told his players, hey, look,  they are holding and getting away with it, go out there and do that, you\'d be upset. You\'d claim he was breaking the rules and what not. Instead, he played the game properly (and I hate to agree with Vid - he\'s just too nice a guy for the league :( ) and a lot of bad plays went uncalled.

To hell with the Patriots .  I figure they will win the Superbowl, but I hope they don\'t. I could be a happy man for the rest of the year, as long as they lose and the camera zooms in on the players anguish and disgust. Ah, yes.
:drool:


(Oh and I agree. It\'s kind of funny this is the second time in three years they have made it to the Superbowl...Oh and it\'s also the second time play calling and pentalies has been a huge factor on them making it. )
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on January 27, 2004, 06:32:25 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip


(Oh and I agree. It\'s kind of funny this is the second time in three years they have made it to the Superbowl...Oh and it\'s also the second time play calling and pentalies has been a huge factor on them making it. )



^^^ that was funny

I am with hurri I hate the lets pertect the players attitude that makes the league so soft. Football is a contact sport. I wanna see ppl get hit hard.

On that note I am all for braddy going down sunday.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 27, 2004, 07:55:02 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
(and I hate to agree with Vid - he\'s just too nice a guy for the league :( ) and a lot of bad plays went uncalled. )



I\'m always right.  So if you don\'t agree with me now you\'ll be jumping on the band wagon later.  ;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: unfocused on January 27, 2004, 10:34:09 PM
Quote
Originally posted by shockwaves
How are they more so than the Panthers?

And I hate the Pats.  There are a bunch of reasons.  As a Jets fan I really dislike Belichick.  I also do not like the team much anyway as a Jets fan.  Plus people generally don\'t like the favorites.  A 14 game win streak makes them that.


I could\'ve sworn you were a Giants fan.  

Yeah Belichick ownz the Colts, so I don\'t like him or the Pats.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on January 28, 2004, 12:30:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by unfocused
I could\'ve sworn you were a Giants fan.  

Yeah Belichick ownz the Colts, so I don\'t like him or the Pats.


I\'m both.


Kinda like you liking both the Dolphins and Colts if I remember correctly :)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: GmanJoe on January 29, 2004, 10:03:50 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SwifDi
I don\'t have any clue how some of you can "hate" the Pats. They seem to be the most blue-collared football team out there.


No way. Steelers, baby!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Jumpman on January 29, 2004, 10:07:58 AM
Is the Superbowl over yet?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Bozco on January 30, 2004, 05:14:32 PM
The game is this Sunday, so no.

Oh, and not liking Belichick is a plenty good reason to not like the Pats.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Luke on January 30, 2004, 08:12:59 PM
Living in Ann Arbor all I hear is Tom Brady this and Tom Brady that. I\'m ropoting for the Panthers simply so all these freakin\' Wolverene fans wil shut thier yapper.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 31, 2004, 07:32:37 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Luke
Living in Ann Arbor all I hear is Tom Brady this and Tom Brady that. I\'m ropoting for the Panthers simply so all these freakin\' Wolverene fans wil shut thier yapper.


y\'know i was going to ask the question why do people in general like their football teams or any team for that matter. i generally thought that it was just for the fact that people just liked the uniforms,. which is the case for me (dallas) but obviously it\'s for a variety of reasons as mentioned above..
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on January 31, 2004, 07:50:26 AM
Quote
Originally posted by clips
y\'know i was going to ask the question why do people in general like their football teams or any team for that matter. i generally thought that it was just for the fact that people just liked the uniforms,. which is the case for me (dallas) but obviously it\'s for a variety of reasons as mentioned above..


Wow, I think you are serious..  CHeck down stairs.  DO you have a penis?  You sound like a chick.

Personally I like teams based on where I live (Because you are slammed with info about the team daily) and the players.  If I followed a player through college I can enjoy watching the team because of the player.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Bozco on January 31, 2004, 07:53:02 AM
Yup, main reason I like the Colts is Mike Doss.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: clips on January 31, 2004, 09:04:23 AM
Quote
Originally posted by videoholic
Wow, I think you are serious..  CHeck down stairs.  DO you have a penis?  You sound like a chick.

Personally I like teams based on where I live (Because you are slammed with info about the team daily) and the players.  If I followed a player through college I can enjoy watching the team because of the player.


:laughing: am i a chick? i can show you my massive CLIP if you want! :D but yeah i was serious. i was reading somewhere and it stated MOST people like their teams just for the uniforms. which is tru for me to some extent...for example take tampa bay, when they wore the old orange i really didn\'t them that much, now when they swichted over to their current unis. i was feeling them a little bit..well not so much now as i feel sapp is arrogant! when people used to talk about him i tried to take up for him but some of the things he\'s said & done is just unprofessional.

that said of course i like teams to some extent for the players,.but the first impression for me has to be the uniforms.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on February 01, 2004, 07:03:18 AM
Sapp is a complete asshole and I hope to God the Bucs dump that piece of shit on his fat ass.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: ROL Jamas on February 01, 2004, 10:13:23 AM
Chiefs...most local team. Best team when it comes to pickin\' up my Huskers (See: Eric Warfield, Will Sheilds, Neil Smith, the list goes on), that and my dad got me into them, and the Chiefs got me into football in general.

See Yuz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on February 01, 2004, 11:19:21 AM
Quote
y\'know i was going to ask the question why do people in general like their football teams or any team for that matter. i generally thought that it was just for the fact that people just liked the uniforms,. which is the case for me (dallas) but obviously it\'s for a variety of reasons as mentioned above.


Yeah you do sound like a chick. Never had a sex change;)

But I like a team because I usually follow players throughout there career and because they are talent guys.

I live in MI and I followed Brady but I hate his guts. He wants to be that all american QB so bad I hate that. Funny all these radio station up here making jokes about who has he is going to be dating this superbowl.

The pats are a overrated defense and offense. I have a sick feeling that the pats will win just because of the panthers lack of experience.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on February 01, 2004, 02:41:46 PM
Quick Superbowl prediction:

Panthers win by a defensive touchdown in overtime.

23-17
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Jumpman on February 01, 2004, 04:21:46 PM
What a crappy game. I\'d rather watch a dog licking itself.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: mjps21983 on February 01, 2004, 05:01:50 PM
It\'s just picking up ass lick, they had to feel each other out a bit.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Jumpman on February 01, 2004, 05:16:32 PM
I dislike watching grown men feel each other out. If you\'re into that stuff then all the more power to you.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Jumpman on February 01, 2004, 06:13:37 PM
Anyone catch the halftime show?

Janet\'s a dirty lil biotch.

Upon further review, that is her nipple, therefore I can\'t post the pics. Poor Jacksons. Raping little boys now this.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Phil on February 01, 2004, 06:55:01 PM
Yeah I missed it, but I just couldn\'t take more than 30 seconds of that half time show.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on February 01, 2004, 07:34:16 PM
I hate the Patriots now. Man the Panthers had it, but the kicker had to go and botch one and put them at the 40.

Panthers should be just as strong next year.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: videoholic on February 01, 2004, 07:38:50 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Jumpman
What a crappy game. I\'d rather watch a dog licking itself.


Well, that goes without saying.



I assume Janet is trying to get some free pub with that titty hanging out.  Nice titty too.  Thank God for TiVo.  SHe has a CD coming out I think next week.  Nothing better than throwing some titty out there for sales.


Panthers SO had it.  Oh well.  I have to say it really sucks watching a game where I don\'t give a rats ass about either team.

Oh, and the commercials this year SUCKED
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: theomen on February 01, 2004, 07:39:00 PM
Jumpy, send me the nip

and a picture of a dog licking itself....don\'t judge me
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: GmanJoe on February 01, 2004, 07:41:10 PM
I saw one jiggly boob. :p Made my hour, at least.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Blade on February 01, 2004, 07:42:05 PM
The commercials were kind of underwhelming. I\'m glad the Patriots won, though.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Halberto on February 01, 2004, 07:42:42 PM
Best super bowl ever........

except I was gunning for the Panthers. :(
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on February 01, 2004, 07:43:42 PM
It\'s funny, after this game I actually truly hate the Patriots. They\'ve become quite arrogant since 2 years ago... Just the way the guys bump Panthers when they\'re down and I see their mouths yappin has sent my respect from them to the toilet.

They WON\'T repeat.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 01, 2004, 07:52:33 PM
Agree\'d. The Patriots is the arrogant \'rich boys\' team that has no respect for the other teams. Who was starting fights? The Patriots. Who was yapping? The Patriots. Who was swinging punches while a man was down (and yes it happened)? The Patriots.

F**K Brady , F**K Bellichek and F**K the rest of the Patriots.

As for the Panther\'s, they put a great showing on and showed the world (including myself) they are not a team to be easily dominated. I just wish John Fox would not went for those 2 pt conversions twice.


Oh and I\'ve got the video clip of Janet Jackson in AVI and MPEG format (mpeg converted from HD capture ! ). Oh and here\'s a G-rated picture.

(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fus.news2.yimg.com%2Fus.yimg.com%2Fp%2Fap%2F20040202%2Fcapt.sbx18102020149.super_bowl_sbx181.jpg&hash=400d28aacc32e3fd401639e2326699cf4df834d7)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on February 01, 2004, 08:13:21 PM
I couldn\'t be happier.

No one will ever remember that Vinatieri missed two kicks, only that he kicked the game winner.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 01, 2004, 08:26:40 PM
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
I couldn\'t be happier.

No one will ever remember that Vinatieri missed two kicks, only that he kicked the game winner.


No, only Patriot fans will remember that. Everyone else will remember that The Patriots played good enough to win, but not really that good. If you take in account a couple things.

John Fox and his 2 pt conversion. Missed it, which forced the 2nd POINT conversion and missed that.

Bad clock mangement on the Panther\'s side. They was doin\' great, movin\' right down the field and lost track of the fact they left New England to much time to get into field goal range.

As for Brady being so good. What the hell are you smoking? Who has won the last big games for Patriots? The friggin\' kicker. Brady rarely ever get\'s far ahead in a big game. It always comes down to 3 pts. He simply is not that good and the Panther\'s proved that tonight.  

Yes, the Patriot\'s won, but it was not that impressive of a win. They had great field position how many times? And they botched it almost everytime. How was the special teams for the Patriots? Vinetari missed two easy field goals, punter\'s first punts didn\'t go over 30 yards . What was Brady doin\'? Not a damn thing. Two five yard passes for TD\'s. Hardly impressive, when you take in account one of them was from the Carolina 20 due to Jake\'s fumble.

Yes, they won, but not because they are the "greatest". They won because the Panther\'s need some more work. More clock mangement and John Fox needs alittle more foresight. He was to eager to close the game and it costed the Panthers. On the other hand, kudos to Jake. Yes, he fumbled the ball - but what did he do? Instead of gettin\' in the dumps, he came out and scored. He done it everytime. The Patriots would get ahead and he\'d take his team in 2 mintues, the lenght of the field and score. That\'s the sign of a good quaterbook and for a rookie, it\'s damn impressive.

Here\'s to next year!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Black Samurai on February 01, 2004, 09:13:30 PM
People always hate the number one guy. When the Pats were the underdog everyone hated the Rams.

Hate all you want. MY team one it all for the second time in two years and your squad was at home watching the shitty ass commercials.

I really don\'t see how you can say the Pats were doing anything that the Cats were not; but you guys are totally unbiased so...whatever

BTW, GO PATS!!!!!

I wanted to talk trash in this thread SOOOO much but I have this superstition thing.

If I had to say that I disliked ANYONE from this game it would be Steve Smith. He is as cocky(cockier) as someone like TO or Sapp but he never does anything. I LOVE to see people like him lose. Which makes this win that much sweeter.

(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nfl.com%2Fu%2Fsuperbowl%2Fphotos%2Fsuperbowl637_lower.jpg&hash=fe0b2099a8f279147e0cd48204bcaf5fa117c0ed)
Yes sir! Hold it high.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 01, 2004, 09:26:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
People always hate the number one guy. When the Pats were the underdog everyone hated the Rams.

Hate all you want. MY team one it all for the second time in two years and your squad was at home watching the shitty ass commercials.

I really don\'t see how you can say the Pats were doing anything that the Cats were not; but you guys are totally unbiased so...whatever

BTW, GO PATS!!!!!

I wanted to talk trash in this thread SOOOO much but I have this superstition thing.

If I had to say that I disliked ANYONE from this game it would be Steve Smith. He is as cocky(cockier) as someone like TO or Sapp but he never does anything. I LOVE to see people like him lose. Which makes this win that much sweeter.

(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nfl.com%2Fu%2Fsuperbowl%2Fphotos%2Fsuperbowl637_lower.jpg&hash=fe0b2099a8f279147e0cd48204bcaf5fa117c0ed)
Yes sir! Hold it high.


You and Hurricane are not the \'Blind Pratriot duo\' are you? It\'s kind of like that Saturday Night Live "Gay Duo" skit.

;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Black Samurai on February 01, 2004, 09:39:21 PM
BTW, The Pats won 15 games in a row. Their opponents were a combined 22 games OVER .500. They have not trailed in a game since November. Brady threw for 354 yards, three touchdowns, and one pick. Pretty good numbers in ANY games let alone the Superbowl.

This is not a bad/overrated team no matter how much you want them to be. If this team is bad or overrated then all of the "good" teams in the league are bad or overrated. Why? BECAUSE THE PATS BEAT THEM ALREADY!!!!

You act like Vinnie T kicked a 70 yard field goal. In every single one of Vinnie\'s big kicks in 2001-2003 Brady drove the Pats into Field Goal range. I am willing to bet that all but 5-6 teams in the league would love to have him on their squad. But hey, I\'m an idiot because I like a good team.

(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nfl.com%2Fu%2Fsuperbowl%2Fphotos%2Fsuperbowl636_lower.jpg&hash=4c651436e041d137d6ba841d579bef6f6f96ecbb)
I win a lot of games and have good stats but I suck. WOOOO!!!
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 01, 2004, 09:43:25 PM
Give it a break. Football season is over. The Patriots won. Some of us cannot stand the Patriots and think they\'re over-rated but that doesn\'t change the fact that they won and football season is over. It\'s time to move on, it\'s a new day, it\'s Monday now. A day after the Superbowl and the 03 season.

Congrat\'s that your team won, but I still say F**K the Patriots.
;)

Now, onto another sport or season. Next Sunday marks the AFL start, doesn\'t it?
;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Bozco on February 01, 2004, 09:44:22 PM
Someone send me the non G-Rated version of Janet because I missed what happened.  I was off in space and everybody in the room was like what the hell.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 01, 2004, 09:45:14 PM
Will do Boz.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Black Samurai on February 01, 2004, 09:52:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
I still say F**K the Patriots. ;)
You\'re in the clear. I know you aren\'t a bandwagon Pats hater. Its other people I don\'t like.

BTW, What is up with picking a team by the uniforms? Seriously, WTF? That may not be the gayest thing I ever read(looks in Racer\'s direction) but damn.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 01, 2004, 09:56:52 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
You\'re in the clear. I know you aren\'t a bandwagon Pats hater. Its other people I don\'t like.

BTW, What is up with picking a team by the uniforms? Seriously, WTF? That may not be the gayest thing I ever read(looks in Racer\'s direction) but damn.


Like I said, I am happy for the fans of the Patriots. Your team won and it must be a great feeling. I however, am not a fan of the Patriots. Still - I can\'t deny the fact they won 15 straight games and are the winner of the Superbowl. I can only bitch and moan about why I dislike them. ;)

As for the uniforms - you mean that\'s not how you pick your favorite team? Damnit! Seriously though, the only time I have ever heard that before was from a girl , who made a comment about how she liked Phili\'s uniforms... Go figure.

Oh and as for bandwagon haters / fans. I agree. I can\'t stand either one. If you look back in the thread, I made a comment about bandwagon Chief fans and how New England was not getting any attention at all, even though they was also doin\' an outstanding job early in the season. Why? Because the bandwagon fans all jumped on the Chief\'s wagon when Dante Hall had his great kick-off return\'s. What happened when the Chief\'s defense fell apart and Dante Hall quit running kick-off\'s back every game? There was less and less Chief fans.

Let me add a quick thing also. I was not a fan of either team in the Superbowl but I had two reasons for rooting for the Panthers in this game.

(1) The Patriots stole my beloved Colt\'s Superbowl chance. Of course I had to root against them. ;)

(2) The Panther\'s was the team that no one ever took serious. Hell, I didn\'t take them serious. They worked hard to get that far, a lot of big come backs and great overtime wins. They earned it and see\'ing Jake drive that team this season and into the Superbowl, making desperate comebacks everytime. It was inspirational. I actually felt bad for him when that final field goal was kicked and was so clearly straight down the middle.

How about a Colts / Panther\'s game next year?
:D
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on February 01, 2004, 10:03:03 PM
Sad lost for the Panthers. I think Brady is completely over-rated, especially in this game. Delhomme played ALOT better. But what you gonna do? Panthers gave them a hard time and the whole "kicker saves the day" deal is getting kind of annoying.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 01, 2004, 10:52:28 PM
Before I forget: Onto the Pro-Bowl!! Because we all know that is the true judgement of a player\'s skill!

:rolleyes:
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: JBean on February 01, 2004, 11:20:09 PM
The chiefs have 9 pro-bowlers this year!


More than any other team... and Will Shields won NFL Man Of the Year.  Now if they can fix that defense for next year we\'ll be set.

No more NFL..... I always dread the end of the season.  This time of year sucks for sports.  Time to watch some baseball I guess.


:(
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on February 01, 2004, 11:22:42 PM
All I know is the guy I hate the most in the NFL is Terrell Owens. I\'ve never had a problem with his over the top antics when celebrating, but if you are going to whine and complain about not getting the ball, and drop balls thrown in your direction, THEN SHUT YOUR MOUTH. The last straw had to be when he put down Garcia...

Owens needs to leave, will be the best thing that happened to San Francisco.

Brandon Lloyd > Terrell Owens
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SirMystiq on February 01, 2004, 11:31:48 PM
What did TO say about Garcia?
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 01, 2004, 11:38:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SirMystiq
What did TO say about Garcia?


Not a quote..
The jest of it was that he would not play at San Franisco, unless Garcia left or was dropped from the team.

Oh and here\'s a picture of the number one New England fan gettin\' alittle happy.

(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fus.news2.yimg.com%2Fus.yimg.com%2Fp%2Fap%2F20040202%2Fcapt.macs10602020514.super_bowl_patriots_reax_macs106.jpg&hash=60a517707c5cea3e111d03824497d50468eedc3b)

Yes, you\'ve been caught on camera , Hurricane.

;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on February 02, 2004, 03:54:00 AM
LOL:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on February 02, 2004, 04:42:02 AM
Oh, and I don\'t know who said Brady was overrated, he did set the Superbowl record for completions (32).

Just a little tid-bit.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: mjps21983 on February 02, 2004, 07:21:52 AM
Brady is over-rated, sorry hurricane, he has to be the dumbest quarterback I\'ve ever heard speak!!! Anyways I hate the patriots always have and always will, they\'re from BOSTON, so they blow nuts.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: QuDDus on February 02, 2004, 08:32:07 AM
Well I didn\'t even watch the whole superbowl, but I did catch the Janet boob:D Only wish I could have seen it in person.

I hate the pats and you will never see me anywhere saying I am a pats fan. I have hated brady for the longest time now. Everyone up here jumps on the MI bandwaggon and roots for brady.

I am not a huge panthers fan but i liked them 10 times more than the pats. And I have stated before I feel they are overrated.

I wasn\'t to thrilled about any team in the playoffs that much except the colts. Because I feel like payton has been putting up huge numbers all these years and not getting his just dues.

As for me you will see me next year rooting for dolphins baby.
I have always hated ricky williams and I point out is homosexuality all the time. But man the guy is good as hell and the dolphins are a hell of a underrated defense.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Mr. Kennedy on February 02, 2004, 09:23:20 AM
Why does everyone hate Brady?  For god\'s sake what did he ever do to you?  He plays the game, and he plays it well, but he will never be anything like Manning, McNair, Favre, Vick, etc...  he plays good enough for the Pats to win and he doesn\'t turnover the ball, and you know what, that\'s fine by me.  I\'ll take 2 superbowl rings in 3 years.

Two years ago everybody laughed at the pats and said they had no chance, and they pulled off a huge upset.  They came into the Superbowl as favorites and everyone hated them, cause "they always get lucky."  You don\'t get lucky fricken 15 weeks in a row.

However, if the Colts were in the Super Bowl, and they had one they would have been "Da Bomb"

Football isn\'t scripted, you can\'t be like, I hate the Pats, lets have them have an 0-16 season.  Oh I like the Colts, they deserve to win the Superbowl.

If you not happy, so be it, but don\'t try and take away the Pats victory.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Black Samurai on February 02, 2004, 11:18:43 AM
Quote
Originally posted by QuDDus
the dolphins are a hell of a underrated defense.
Are you serious? Brady is overrated and the Dolphins D is underrated? Give me a ****ing break.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: shockwaves on February 02, 2004, 11:45:21 AM
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
Why does everyone hate Brady?  For god\'s sake what did he ever do to you?  


(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsportsillustrated.cnn.com%2Ffootball%2Fcollege%2Fnews%2F1999%2F03%2F21%2Fmichigan_spring%2Ft1_brady_all_01.jpg&hash=e857f29b9dedb45854b09967e886dd3cfda4087f)

\'Nuff Said



And yes, as much as I hate to admit it, he is underrated.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: IareEthan on February 02, 2004, 12:20:51 PM
For a game where I could have given less of a shit about either team, it proved to be good.  Not great, but good.

No one can take away the Pats victory.  And it would be ignorant to say that they always get lucky.  Granted they were handed the game by Kasay, but they also botched two field goals.  You win some you lose some...the Pats just win more than they lose:)

It was a great football season...next will be very interesting as well, for me at least, and all Eagles fans for that matter.  We made it SO far this year, especially considering all the injuries.  If we handle free agency well...meaning we maintain a decent secondary, and pick up a decent reciever (there\'s no way in hell Terrell Owens will come here...but should he...damn would Philly be an offensive powerhouse) Eagles could go all the way next year.  That, or lose four nfc championships in a row.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 02, 2004, 07:21:27 PM
I hate Brady and the Pat\'s because Hurricane likes them and I hate him, thus I have to hate the Pats.

;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on February 02, 2004, 07:52:23 PM
Yeah, Brady is definitely underrated as is Jake Delhomme... He\'s a great quarterback, but he speaks like an 8 year old... Luckily in football there\'s no oratorical contests.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 03, 2004, 07:47:42 AM
I just love this thread for two reasons...


1: Swif\'s so badly called predictions. He is as bad as me, when it comes to predicting a game.

2; Hurricane\'s \'wanna-be\' ESPN commentary. It\'s laughable, it\'s annoying and by god, it\'s cliche\'d. You read one sentence and you know what the next is going to say. Why? Because I don\'t think the boy has one single original thought in his head.

Oh and damnit, football season is over. All other sports suck.

:(

{ Don\'t take me serious in the above post. I\'m half asleep, read over this page again and came up with that out of nowhere. I just like picking on the two posters mentioned above.  It\'s nothing personal and it\'s not a serious post.

:D

And now it\'s time for the only serious part of this post.

Quote
As for me you will see me next year rooting for dolphins baby.
 I have always hated ricky williams and I point out is homosexuality all the time. But man the guy is good as hell and the dolphins are a hell of a underrated defense.


 


So, you change teams every year? What\'s up with that? You may as well also change teams when they change their uniforms, like Clips.

;)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Black Samurai on February 03, 2004, 08:00:30 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Oh and damnit, football season is over. All other sports suck.
^^^The only statement in this thread that can go uncontested.
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: Living-In-Clip on February 03, 2004, 08:05:22 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
^^^The only statement in this thread that can go uncontested.


And go figure, it was from me?!?!?!

:)
Title: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!!
Post by: SwifDi on February 03, 2004, 01:56:12 PM
I\'ll be back when the NBA playoffs start and my Lakers start whompin everybody.