PSX5Central
Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: luckee on April 07, 2004, 09:11:58 AM
-
On another board I frequent, a user works for a company that produces FHM Magazine... and this pic was passed around. 100% genuine. The one on the left was taken by the photographer, the one on the right is what appeared in the magazine
-
It figures - we (as men) have gotten so used to women in photographs looking flawless that the woman on the left has several major flaws IMO and shouldn\'t even be in a magazine. I think by herself (the one on the left) wouldn\'t look so bad, but when you see them both it really makes the real her look horrible.
Is that a C-section scar on her lower abdomen? Not a bad looking woman from above the belly button up - but not so grand south of that.
-
also looks like she is peeing in the shower on the left but maybe some of the weird people here might acutallly like that.
-
Originally posted by Cyrus
also looks like she is peeing in the shower on the left but maybe some of the weird people here might acutallly like that.
:laughing: I totally missed that!!!! Golden showers for everyone!
-
Her thighs are unusually disproportioned in comparison to her upper body.
-
Don\'t wanna sound like an ass but the woman on the left doesn\'t seem like model material. I know the mags airbrush like crazy but many of those models have to appear live in swimsuits at fashion shows or in movies. Not sure how she would fare doing that.
May just be a bad photo, wish we had more of her.
-
"real" models cost too much. :D
-
In the pic on the right one of her legs is wider than the other.
-
Agreed, she isn\'t really model-material. Albeit she isn\'t a bad-looking potato-head, she is only mildly above attractive in my opinion.