PSX5Central

Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: ooseven on July 12, 2004, 03:10:34 AM

Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: ooseven on July 12, 2004, 03:10:34 AM
Quote

The US policy on Aids prevention has sparked fresh controversy on the second day of an international summit on the disease in the Thai capital Bangkok.
The Bush administration advocates sexual abstinence as the best way to stop the disease spreading.

Many scientists and activists, however, favour encouraging the use of condoms.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3885629.stm


sexual abstinence ?  

yeah that will work :rolleyes:
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: THX on July 12, 2004, 03:55:16 AM
I don\'t see what the big deal is...

The only 100% sure-fire way not to get STDs is to not have sex.

I mean wtf do u want the man to do??
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: ooseven on July 12, 2004, 04:04:37 AM
yes its 100% sure fireway...

but its hardly practical, seeing that the vast majority of cases of STD\'s come from people thinking it won\'t happen to them anyway and not using protection.

In Short Bush should promote the attatude of...

Sexual abstinence is the 100% way of avoiding STD\'s

the other way is using protection !

Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: GmanJoe on July 12, 2004, 04:05:47 AM
And condoms prevent STD\'s 95% of the time.  5% may not seem bad....but ask the 5% who got them.

Monogamy = it may not be better than a threesome....but yer getting some. :D
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: THX on July 12, 2004, 04:14:26 AM
Ok but this is really a low blow; you can\'t blame Bush for everything.  The article says the Ugandan president is adapting Bush\'s advice:

Quote
abstinence and loving relationships in marriage were even more crucial to fighting Aids than condoms.

That sounds right to me.  Arguing against that is like saying:

- I like to race.

- Bush\'s repsonse: You\'ll reduce the risk of death if you race only at a track.

- That\'s not good enough.  I want to race whenever I want as much as I want and not have any fear of death.

You get the idea..  People can\'t always get what they want, but they can blame Bush for it :p
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: ooseven on July 12, 2004, 04:34:57 AM
well now that you mention it...at least he\'s not as bad as the Catholic church who are now going round the 3rd world and saying that using condoms will increase you chance of contacting Aid’s.
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: GigaShadow on July 12, 2004, 04:36:05 AM
Come on ooseven, next thing you know you will be blaming Bush for solar flares. :rolleyes:
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: ooseven on July 12, 2004, 04:37:28 AM
anying to get that Monkey in Human form out of the White house. ;)


Same go\'s for Blair :D
Title: Re: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: SirMystiq on July 12, 2004, 08:43:59 AM
Quote
Originally posted by ooseven
sexual abstinence ?  

yeah that will work :rolleyes:


Hello!!!

The Bible says "no sex"

Therefore Bush says "no sex"

I bet he\'s in Opus Dei
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: MPTheory on July 12, 2004, 09:08:23 AM
yeah, I can see it now, Bush passes new law to put video cameras in people\'s bedrooms to make sure you are practicing abstinence.
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: Black Samurai on July 12, 2004, 09:37:30 AM
Wait....what\'s this? Bush is responsible for solar flares?!?!!?! I must spread the word.
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: Deadly Hamster on July 12, 2004, 09:54:10 AM
Honestly, funding sexual education about  protection devices is a LOT more productive.
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: Black Samurai on July 12, 2004, 12:23:31 PM
^^^Isn\'t the BEST protection device abstinence?
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: SwifDi on July 12, 2004, 01:05:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Deadly Hamster
Honestly, funding sexual education about  protection devices is a LOT more productive.


Waste of money. People will do what they want... Condoms aren\'t even a for sure protection from AIDS.
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: Titan on July 13, 2004, 11:24:44 AM
Quote
Originally posted by ooseven
sexual abstinence ?  

yeah that will work :rolleyes:


As in theory abstinence is good, in reality, no one ever does it. They preach sexual abstinence in school and religious courses but IMO, it makes kids want to do it more. I say they put more emphasis on teaching kids how to use condoms or go the route they go in England and preach oral sex :p
Title: Bush\'s Aids policy Dated 1018 AD
Post by: SirMystiq on July 15, 2004, 08:40:57 PM
^^^

I agree with both sides. Abstinence is the ONLY 100% sure fire way. But to say that teenagers will stop having sex is stupid. It\'s irresponsible to say that every teenager will stop having sex because of some program and then the whole world will be better.