PSX5Central

Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: ooseven on August 03, 2004, 03:35:50 AM

Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: ooseven on August 03, 2004, 03:35:50 AM: US terror plot intelligence \'old\'

Quote

The US administration admits that new warnings of attacks on US cities were based on information gathered by al-Qaeda up to four years ago.
Security was tightened around financial institutions earlier this week after raids in Pakistan.

Homeland security adviser Frances Townsend said some of the information recovered was gathered in 2000/2001.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3530358.stm

:rolleyes:
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: mjps21983 on August 03, 2004, 08:57:55 AM: better safe than sorry.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: ROL Jamas on August 04, 2004, 07:00:12 AM: Either that, or maybe the United States is 4 light years away from the Middle East. That would work, right? Jeez.

See Yuz.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: Ace on August 04, 2004, 08:38:56 AM: It was old info with some new bits of related info coming to light and that\'s why it became relevant.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: NVIDIA256 on August 04, 2004, 12:17:57 PM: Yes another FAKE terror alert, what\'s new?[/COLOR]

I guess I should provide some proof/examples before I get called a conspiracy theorist.

World Net Daily 01/06/03: Jon Dougherty
Terror alerts manufactured?
FBI agents say White House scripting \'hysterics\' for political effect

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30312

Capitol Hill Blue 02/12/03
Politics drove decision to raise alert level

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=14&num=1747

Washington Times 05/22/02: Joseph Curl
The Bush administration issued a spate of terror alerts in recent days to mute criticism that its national security team sat on intelligence warnings in the weeks before the September 11 attacks.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/news_alert_052202_faketerror.html

ABC News 01/07/03
Fake Infiltration
Sources Say Informant Made Up Story of Men Who Slipped Into U.S.

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/alert_hoax030106.html
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: Ace on August 04, 2004, 12:23:23 PM: How about 2004?
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: NVIDIA256 on August 04, 2004, 12:38:35 PM: You trying to get smart with me? ;)

I\'m assuming your comment was meant sarcastically?

I just posted what I could find in my archives.

Oh and you do realize it\'s a Federal crime to issue fake terror alerts, but the globalists are the criminals, so there allowed to do this and get away with it.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: NVIDIA256 on August 04, 2004, 12:58:00 PM: Quote
How about 2004?

You asked I delivered, saw this 4 minutes ago, Today’s NEWYORK POST. This just confirms that the intelligence based on this new Fake terror alert is from old out-dated reports

OLD, OBSOLETE TERROR REPORTS = FAKE ALERT: Reports That Led to Terror Alert Were Years Old, Officials Say

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/03/politics/03intel.html?ei=5006&en=6e83ab1aabef13c3&ex=1092110400&partner=ALTAVISTA1&pagewanted=print&position=
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: mjps21983 on August 04, 2004, 01:52:47 PM: And as if the New York times is the most credible paper in the worl to be taking information from. Especially being as they are extremely liberal, and would throw up any kind of information that they would find.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: NVIDIA256 on August 04, 2004, 02:04:46 PM: Oh please I can post more new sources if you like. Plus did you bother to read the 5 articles I posted up there in regards to the government admitting they issued fake terror alerts. This is not a Liberal/democratic issue here. You just wait till Kerry get\'s in he will be no different then BUSH. I don\'t buy into the false left/right paradigm that has exsisted here in america for too long.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: clips on August 04, 2004, 02:34:40 PM: well i guess the gov\'t is like damned if we do & damned if we don\'t...one thing is certain...i certainly believe we will be hit by another terror attack,..and i feel it won\'t be at a time when everybody\'s expecting it...(new years,..labor day,..etc) we\'re almost like a nation under seige...but then we contradict ourselves...

see a gov\'t official will be like "we\'ve just received credible information of a possible terrorist attack.. we\'ve raised the terror alert"..then he\'ll say "but please feel free to go about your everyday business and enjoy life"...:rolleyes: :laughing:
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: GigaShadow on August 04, 2004, 02:39:45 PM: Quote
Originally posted by clips
well i guess the gov\'t is like damned if we do & damned if we don\'t...one thing is certain...i certainly believe we will be hit by another terror attack,..

I couldn\'t agree more and if we did get hit and no information was released or the alert raised - just imagine the shit storm that would follow. As you said damned if you do, damned if you don\'t.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: clips on August 04, 2004, 02:51:44 PM: Quote
Originally posted by GigaShadow
I couldn\'t agree more and if we did get hit and no information was released or the alert raised - just imagine the shit storm that would follow. As you said damned if you do, damned if you don\'t.

yep..there would be complaints & lawsuits through the ceiling...me personally i don\'t want to know of any alerts or threats..i just want to know that the people responsible for those things are handling it behind the scenes...people think the gov\'t are some type of super elite force that\'s supposed to stop everything...reality check people..they\'re human just like you & I...
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: Halberto on August 04, 2004, 05:07:18 PM: Dammit ooseven dont you have anything else better to do?
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: Ashford on August 04, 2004, 05:09:46 PM: No negative Blair news, lately...
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: Deadly Hamster on August 04, 2004, 07:35:21 PM: " I couldn\'t agree more and if we did get hit and no information was released or the alert raised - just imagine the shit storm that would follow. As you said damned if you do, damned if you don\'t.

"

So I guess it\'s better to provide the nation with at first a phase of FEAR, then a false sense of SECURITY.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: Viper_Fujax on August 04, 2004, 07:53:54 PM: im too lazy to read, but didnt they say 9/11 took them 5 years to plan? Why give them greif over being protective over something that took 4 years..er however old it was.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: mjps21983 on August 04, 2004, 09:18:06 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Viper_Fujax
im too lazy to read, but didnt they say 9/11 took them 5 years to plan? Why give them greif over being protective over something that took 4 years..er however old it was.

Because people look for anything to complain about with this administration. Well now they are saying there was 3rd party information other than what they had compiled from years ago. And to go back on Nvidia I\'m just pointing out that New York Times loves to get there hands on things to make news and thats that, they have been infamous for this.
Title: Ah well...better later than never.
Post by: GigaShadow on August 05, 2004, 04:32:30 AM: Quote
Originally posted by Deadly Hamster
" I couldn\'t agree more and if we did get hit and no information was released or the alert raised - just imagine the shit storm that would follow. As you said damned if you do, damned if you don\'t.

"

So I guess it\'s better to provide the nation with at first a phase of FEAR, then a false sense of SECURITY.

I would rather know what is going on then be completely left in the dark. I also don\'t see how this promotes fear as opposed to a heightened state of awareness.