PSX5Central
Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: videoholic on February 06, 2005, 02:28:16 PM
-
No points. Just curious as to who you think will win.
I\'m tired of people going gaga over the patriots. I hope they lose their ass off.
But, then again.
It\'s also kind of funny how close Philly gets to the superbowl every year just to fail. Now they are in it and it would be great for the asshole fans of Philly to SUCK IT!!! Plus I have an ex-girlfriend in Philly who can suck it!!!
OK, so now what. I\'m going to go with the Eagles. WHat the heck. Always good to go against the grain.
34-28 Philly.
-
I always go for the hometeam
Go Patriots
-
My brain: "Dude, you can\'t argue with the numbers. New England beats the fuck out of everyone, no matter what."
My heart: "Sure, the Steelers fell short, but Philly is a Pennsylvania team too, and you know you\'d love to see the Pats get raped in the big game."
My Mind: "Who really fucking cares? This one\'s gonna suck no matter what."
-
Not even going to bother...
-
The Patriots BeYoTcH!!
-
post points bitches
-
Points? What do you mean by points? If you mean score than it\'s 0 to 0
-
who won the "game before the game" promo this year? I\'m just curious.
I think the score will be 37 to 14 Patriots win.
I\'m not a football guy though.
-
Originally posted by juslight
who won the "game before the game" promo this year? I\'m just curious.
I think the score will be 37 to 14 Patriots win.
I\'m not a football guy though. [/QUOTE
Lol I think it will be like half the score. Have you seen how the defenses are playing?
17-10 kinda game.
-
I really don\'t watch football at all, so my opinion is pure mental fantasy.
-
24-17 philly....
-
Originally posted by juslight
who won the "game before the game" promo this year? I\'m just curious.
I think the score will be 37 to 14 Patriots win.
I\'m not a football guy though.
I don\'t think there was a GBTG this year, because there was no GameDay this year.
Anyway, so far, this has been the most craptastic Super Bowl ever. They\'re both playing like high-schoolers.
-
Well, it looks like my numbers were way off. I guess I thought they would be making more touchdowns.
You were right
I was wrong
You\'re smart
I\'m stupid
You\'re good looking
I\'m kinda ugly
You have lots of money
I have to use coupons
are you happy?
-
I grew up in Jersey wearing Eagles hats to school with everyone else.
I hope the Eagles win just to kill some egos. ;)
-
21- 14 pats..i know it\'s early in the 4th but...hopefully philly can pull this off...:(..i\'m a dallas fan so i gotta roll with the nfc squad...and i don\'t particulary hate the eagles anyway...
holy amazing comebacks batman! philly scored with 1:49 left :eek:...24-21 pats..
-
I hate the eagles, phew....
-
WE DID IT!!!!!!!
3X SUPERBOWL CHAMPIONS
PATRIOTS = DYNASTY!!!
IM SO DRUNK RIGHT NOW!!!!
-
Shoulda\' kicked it deep.
-
Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots.
-
Originally posted by Weltall
Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots. Fucking Patriots.
someone\'s a little pissed
-
Yay for the Pats, but more importantly Charlie Weis... Its gonna be much easier to recruit flashing 3 super bowl rings.
-
blah blah blah, notre dame sucks. blah blah.
-
Originally posted by The Hurricane
someone\'s a little pissed
It\'s really hard to be pissed. I\'m just getting bored of this same old shit every year.
...fucking Patriots. :(
-
Originally posted by Weltall
It\'s really hard to be pissed. I\'m just getting bored of this same old shit every year.
...fucking Patriots. :(
can\'t really be mad weltall as in every decade it seems there\'s always a dominating team goin to the superbowl for about 3 yrs straight...
early- mid 90\'s my boys..cowboys that is..
late 90\'s early 00 rams..dominated..
2001- present..i know the raiders and tampa bay dominated for about a yr..somewhere in there,....but after that it\'s been all patriots....
-
Well I gotta give it to the pats for pulling out the win. I mean the eagles just could not convert over on turnovers. And the pats D-line was on McNabb from the start. The eagles never gave up and if T.O was 100% I know we would have won.
The pats look vulnerable and ripe for the picking early on. And even at the end. From this years game I just don\'t see the pats winning next year.
The eagle will be back next year but I am 100% sure the pats won\'t.
-
...and an entire city commits suicide.
I swear, the streets are just full of people walking around, looking like they\'re lost and don\'t know what to do.
-
Why? They had false hope. There was no chance of Philly winning.
Why get your hopes up?
-
This should brighten your day...
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.boston.com%2Fimages%2Fsports%2Fpatriots%2F2004%2F02_06_05_bruschi_1024768.jpg&hash=8bcfa7e185570a0a891c0c4dc339264650156d9c)
-
Welp, I believe I predicted in the other thread that the Pats would win 24-20...I\'d say I was pretty close.
The game came down to Donovan McNabb\'s management of the game. They wasted a lot of time late, and some of his throws were just bad. New England\'s D was just better than the Eagles offense (46 yards rushing for the Eagles, a very telling stat considering the game was close throughout -- they weren\'t forced to pass until late). It was a good game all around, and I personally think the better team won.
As for the Patriots next year...who do they lose, Ty Law? Isn\'t that pretty much it? Whose to say that they won\'t be back next year? To me, even with the loss of both coordinators, they still got the man behind the team in Belicheck, so I think they\'ll be back as strong as ever.
By the way, best Commercial - Dude holding the Knife to the cat with the pasta sauce all over the floor, that was freaking brilliant :)
See Yuz.
-
The biggest losses are not players on the field, but the coaches on the sideline. Weis and Crennel were huge. I have no clue how our offense will react next year, but whoever our CB\'s coach is will do a hell of a job as defensive coordinator next year. That guy has to be credited as much as anyone.
What now?
A threepeat? 4 out of 5? I say let me enjoy this one, and worry about next year when that bridge comes.
-
Okay, here\'s my take: Both teams played like crap, but the Iggles made more mistakes, and at worse times. Save for a few crucial mistakes on McNabb\'s part, they could have easily dispatched the Pats.
Those Patriots though, they have the devil\'s own luck in the Super Bowl for some reason.
-
Yes...they all sold their left gonad to the devil.
-
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftcforums.com%2Fjohnson.jpg&hash=0a1165d95183db075a16a64af9799d671e0eae62)
"That was quite a show, wasn\'t it? It was a well-scripted drama staged by the Patriots for the benefit of the public."
-
Originally posted by QuDDus
From this years game I just don\'t see the pats winning next year.
The eagle will be back next year but I am 100% sure the pats won\'t.
What about this game makes you think the Eagles will remain dominant but the Pats will fall off?
That is such a weird statement.
-
Because eagles can fly and patriots can\'t.
-
Originally posted by Samwise
Because eagles can fly and patriots can\'t.
This one CAN ;)
-
Originally posted by Black Samurai
What about this game makes you think the Eagles will remain dominant but the Pats will fall off?
That is such a weird statement.
The eagles showed a lot of first time jitters. I mean the pats played like crap. Give a few plays and the eagles are your superbowl champs.
The pats had lady luck on their side. I don\'t see them winning next year by the way they played. I believe if we had a 100% T.O we would have been holding up that trophy.
And you gotta think that at some point that the Colts will finally get over the hump.
-
Originally posted by QuDDus
The eagles showed a lot of first time jitters. I mean the pats played like crap. Give a few plays and the eagles are your superbowl champs.
The pats had lady luck on their side. I don\'t see them winning next year by the way they played. I believe if we had a 100% T.O we would have been holding up that trophy.
Give a few plays and the Pats cover the spread with 7+ to spare. I\'m tired of dumb asses coming up with excuses for why teams keep losing instead of why the Pats keep winning.
You say the you can\'t see the Pats winning next year because of the way they played but the team that they BEAT showed enough for you to expect them to win it all next year? You CAN\'T be that biased.
All these \'what ifs\'. What if Ty Law and Tyrone Poole were 100%? What if Eugene Wilson didn\'t get hurt in the first half? What if the refs didn\'t rob the Pats of a score on Brady\'s fumble recovery? Come on. The shit is so stupid.
TO was at 90% and played against a cornerback who was AT LEAST 5 inches shorter. Is it the Pats fault that the Eagles didn\'t capitalize on that match up?
GTFOOHWTOBS.
-
Give a few plays and the Pats cover the spread with 7+ to spare. I\'m tired of dumb asses coming up with excuses for why teams keep losing instead of why the Pats keep winning.
Haha, when the Steelers beat you guys back in October, all we heard were excuses. I know they came back and beat us again, but for eight weeks, all we heard was \'oh, we didn\'t have Corey Dillon\', as if he would have made any difference with the Pats being down by three scores.
-
Originally posted by Weltall
Haha, when the Steelers beat you guys back in October, all we heard were excuses. I know they came back and beat us again, but for eight weeks, all we heard was \'oh, we didn\'t have Corey Dillon\', as if he would have made any difference with the Pats being down by three scores.
The fact of the matter is that Corey Dillon DID play a huge role in that playoff win over the Steelers.
Not too mention Donovan McNabb played like crap as well. That is the worst 350 yard performance I have ever seen.
If our DB\'s did this well with who... Randell Gay and Asante Samuel... imagine next year when they get Ty Law and Tyronne Poole back :eek:
-
Originally posted by Weltall
Haha, when the Steelers beat you guys back in October, all we heard were excuses. I know they came back and beat us again, but for eight weeks, all we heard was \'oh, we didn\'t have Corey Dillon\', as if he would have made any difference with the Pats being down by three scores.
When did I give excuses? When I talked about missing players from that game it was in the context of why we could beat you a second time and even then I said the Steelers were a really good team. I mean if you are going to assign statements from random Pats fans to me then I think it is only fair that you explain the time you said that Ben Roethalphabet was the best QB in the league and that you had the best team in the past 5 years.
Quddus is badically saying that the Pats are not good and that we only won because we were lucky. That in and of itself is bullshit. The AFC was better than the NFC (I am confident that any of the final four in the AFC could have beaten any NFC team in the Superbowl) and the Pats were/are better than the Eagles.
-
But he couldn\'t have in the first game, that\'s my point. You guys got down fast and totally abandoned the run. It\'s not like Kevin Faulk is a nobody.
-
Originally posted by Black Samurai
When did I give excuses? When I talked about missing players from that game it was in the context of why we could beat you a second time and even then I said the Steelers were a really good team. I mean if you are going to assign statements from random Pats fans to me then I think it is only fair that you explain the time you said that Ben Roethalphabet was the best QB in the league and that you had the best team in the past 5 years.
Quddus is badically saying that the Pats are not good and that we only won because we were lucky. That in and of itself is bullshit. The AFC was better than the NFC (I am confident that any of the final four in the AFC could have beaten any NFC team in the Superbowl) and the Pats were/are better than the Eagles.
I didn\'t assign them specifically to you. I wasn\'t even around here when that game took place.
And I\'m not saying the Pats are bad, obviously, they\'re one of the best squads of all time. I\'m just sick of them winning.
-
Originally posted by Blade
Why? They had false hope. There was no chance of Philly winning.
Why get your hopes up?
Funny, considering the Eagles for the most part out played the Pats, but gave the game away with turnovers, and still covered the spread with that TO ratio.
The fact is, the Eagles could have easily won, and one might argue should have won, or at least had more of a chance at it. McNabb played like shit. He cost them at least the three point margin with stupid mistakes. I kinda figured he would, but oh well.
The fact is, it\'s simply not the same thing to say a couple of things going the other way and the Eagles win as to say a couple things go the Pats way and they win by more, because the Pats got all the breaks in that game. And I\'m not saying that\'s luck...the Pats always get all the breaks, and it\'s in how they play the game. But the fact is, one fewer turnover, and the Eagles could have easily won. And it could have been one of several turn overs.
As for Corey Dillon, he was the difference in this game. When the Pats could get nothing going on offense, and the Eagles were completely out pacing them early on, they turned to him, and he came up huge. If I had a vote, he would have been my super bowl MVP.
And I don\'t know why everyone is saying the Pats played like crap. They played exactly how you need to play to win a big game. They established the run, something the Eagles didn\'t do. They won the turnover game and played largely mistake free, something the Eagles CERTAINLY didn\'t do. That\'s what wins championships. That\'s what they\'ve done from the start of things dynasty thing they have going. They played a hell of a lot smarter than the Eagles throughout the entire game, and it won them the Super Bowl. There is absolutely no reason why they can\'t be right back next year.
As for the Eagles, they SHOULD be back next year, because honestly...who\'s gonna beat them? The NFC is shit. The only team that could be Super Bowl worthy in the near future is Atlanta, and then only if they add some key players and Vick matures. But as of right now, I see no reason why they don\'t walk right back into the Super Bowl next year.
But yeah, bottomline, the Super Bowl was a hell of a game. All you Eagles fans insulting the Pats have no reason to, and all you Pats fans insulting the Eagles have no reason to. The teams showed they were damn evenly matched, and the game coulda gone either way. The Pats won, as they seem to always find a way to in these games. But either way, it was a hell of a game.
-
^^^and with that this thread is closed...oh and dallas would\'ve whooped both the pats and the eagles....s**t still no mod powers...:(
-
The Eagles didnt out play the Patriots.......
When you get held to 40 something TOTAL rushing yards, you did not out play your opponent. The Patriots ran the ball more effectively, and their defense dominated. The only reason McNabb had 350 passing yds and 3 tds is because he threw the ball 51 times! It\'s the exact reason why B.J Symmons from T.Tech had so many yard/tds. When you throw the ball 50+ times it\'s hard to be kept under 300 yds. McNabb also played horribly. All you have to do is watch him throw the ball to tell that, he never stepped up and set his feet. This led to a couple of interception/bad passes. The only thing the eagles did right was not get blown away on the defensive side of the ball. They did well considering how often they were on the field.
The game was more of a blow out that the score says.
-
The Eagles are a pass first run second team. They do a lot of screen passing instead of straight runs. The fact is, they had more total yards and more first downs. How you get them doesn\'t matter, as long as you get them.
Looking at Westbrook\'s total yards is a better judgement of the effective running game they had. Westbrook had 104 total yards, which isn\'t bad. It\'s just that some of those will be marked off as passing yards because he got the ball on a screen rather than a handoff. Hell, he and Corey Dillon put up almost the exact same number of total yards, and each had a score.
And if you\'re gonna say that the fact that the Eagles had more passing yards is meaningless because they passed more, couldn\'t I just as easily say the fact that the Pats had more rushing yards is meaningless because they ran the ball more?
The game was LESS of a blowout than the score says.
-
Originally posted by clips
^^^and with that this thread is closed...oh and dallas would\'ve whooped both the pats and the eagles....s**t still no mod powers...:(
Dedskins 2006 biznatch
-
The cat with the pasta, was by far the best commercial, i was roaring with laughter. 8-)
-
When you are -3 in the turnover differential, you did not outplay your opponent. You played stupid.
-
As much as I hate New England, even I realized Philly had no chance. The team is simply not polished enough to go up against a two time champion like New England. Things like Mcnabb running backwards, getting sacked and losing yards is always going to kill your chance of winning when you are going up against a team like New England. Not to mention the poor time mangement on Philly\'s side. They wasted way to much time near the end of the game.
With that said, while I hate New england, congratulation\'s to the fans .