PSX5Central

Non Gaming Discussions => Off-Topic => Topic started by: GmanJoe on September 02, 2005, 11:07:42 AM

Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: GmanJoe on September 02, 2005, 11:07:42 AM
October 2004

Quote
When did this calamity happen? It hasn\'t—yet.


http://205.188.130.53/ngm/0410/feature5/

Quote
Thousands drowned in the murky brew that was soon contaminated by sewage and industrial waste. Thousands more who survived the flood later perished from dehydration and disease as they waited to be rescued. It took two months to pump the city dry, and by then the Big Easy was buried under a blanket of putrid sediment, a million people were homeless, and 50,000 were dead. It was the worst natural disaster in the history of the United States.
Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: Bozco on September 02, 2005, 11:39:33 AM
Yea, in my Geology class my science teacher couldn\'t help but going off on crazy tangents.  I remember one of them was about how not natural the river setup was down there and eventually with it slowly sinking that something terrible is going to happen.
Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: Viper_Fujax on September 02, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
my brother said his teacher like 4 months ago said new orleans would be screwed if a hurricane hit them because they were under sea level. low and behold..

sorry if that was in the article..i read too much for class today, dont feel like doing more.
Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: videoholic on September 02, 2005, 04:53:13 PM
Your brother\'s teacher is a genious.

City+Under Sea Level+Potential path of numerous hurricanes=fucked up
Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: Riku on September 02, 2005, 06:59:17 PM
It was never a question of whether or not this would happen, only a question of when.  National Geographic or Discovery had a special about this about a year ago, they described exactly what would happen.  Sad thing is that this could have been avoided if they had a levee to with stand more than a category 3 hurricane.  I\'ve only heard that the federal/state government denied a budget for a better levee.  Now they will have to spend mega dollars to pump all the water out of the city, reconstruct, and, hopefully, build a proper levee system.
Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: (e) on September 02, 2005, 07:08:09 PM
I wonder what they spent the funds on instead- any way to find out.

New roads? :laughing:
Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: Unicron! on September 02, 2005, 09:13:47 PM
Btw slightly off-topic I thing I saw in Euronews that Europe will send supplies, staff and financial help.
Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: Riku on September 03, 2005, 08:03:41 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Unicron!
Btw slightly off-topic I thing I saw in Euronews that Europe will send supplies, staff and financial help.


I\'m sure everyone who can help will do whatever they can.  

What I don\'t get is all these little bitch whiners that expected the entire world to drop whatever they were doing and come to our aid.  Realize that it does take some time to organize relief efforts.  If I remember correctly it was a few days before we (financially) responded to the tsunami distaster.
Title: National Geographic had a year old article about New Orleans.
Post by: mm on September 03, 2005, 08:13:31 AM
like i said in the other thread

local, state, and federal govt should have had supplies waiting.  they should have expected thousands and thousands of people in LA to do nothing but sit on thier ass and expect to be supported.

so now it\'s a suprise when people come out of the woodwork with nothing but the clothes on thier back