PSX5Central
Playstation/Gaming Discussions => PS3 Discussion => Topic started by: TheGR81 on May 14, 2001, 05:47:52 PM
-
Well there player models, or the rock. :)
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fps2media.ign.com%2Fmedia%2Fpreviews%2Fimage%2Fsmack%2Fsmack_1.jpg&hash=54a5fbecb75adafcfd4deb40b60972fdfc007e43)
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fps2media.ign.com%2Fmedia%2Fpreviews%2Fimage%2Fsmack%2Fsmack_2.jpg&hash=98b526976e601ba259ab375abadcbd9933b64dbd)
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fps2media.ign.com%2Fmedia%2Fpreviews%2Fimage%2Fsmack%2Fsmack_3.jpg&hash=31e370009161c2d56b14de4f520796cf3bb9cbee)
Also here\'s a pic of Raw is War, for the Xbox, you pick which one looks better SD3 or Raw Is war. To me its a tie.
(https://psx5central.com/community/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgamespot.com%2Fgamespot%2Fimages%2Fscreenshots%2Fxbox%2Frawiswar%2Frawiswar_screen005.jpg&hash=760610f56d959586c0a0fdad3a9a542b3d67ef39)
Thanks to Ryu for sending me the links!
-
Oh why oh why can\'t we take the PS2\'s bodies and the X-Box\'s faces and make the perfect model? DRAT TO DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURE!
-
Theres something about a game with naked sweaty men fighting that upseats me.
-
I reckon the PS2 models just shade it :0)
X-box fans...........Just Bring It!!!!
-
...i think the x-box rock looks a little better!!! :(
-
The main differences I see are artistic, but the xbox model has a bit higher poly count. You can\'t tell unless you look closly at the hands and fingers though. Though that could also partly be aristic.
-
IMO, The Xbox model look MUCH better. The higher poly-count makes The Rock look more Muscular and the texture used for his face looks better. I think the Xbox one is better Hands-Down.
-
I think the PS2\'s rocks face looks more like the rock than the X-Box one
-
They both look good. But I can\'t wait to play smackdown 3 at 60fps with characters that detail. The xbox version look awesome as well, I\'m proably get an x box when its realesed. Cause there getting some good games so far.
-
Hell yeah! Thanks Gr81!!!!!!!
IMO PS2 Rock\'s face looks more realistic, it might not be as well textured but the XBox one just looks kinda weird. But, hey, they both look cool as hell. :cool:
-
I think the PS2 models look more like the actual Rock. The Xbox pic just doesn\'t look......right.
-
Originally posted by 182Ways
I think the PS2 models look more like the actual Rock. The Xbox pic just doesn\'t look......right.
Yeah thats what I meant. The real Rock is strong as hell but in those XBox shots he looks freaky.
-
Originally posted by Majin Prince
...i think the x-box rock looks a little better!!! :(
I think so too! :D
-
I got to go against the majority on this one. But the X-box Rock\'s face looks closer to real. Especially the shape of the head. It\'s too slim on the PS2 version. Also the PS2\'s Rock has lips that are too big. Notice the chin on the x-box.
BUT WHERE ARE THE DONKEYS?
-
whats really wrong is the fact that both of these look better than the rocks appearance at the end of the mummy returns
-
well... here\'s how i see it...
similarity to the rock.. xbox wins (but it has nothing to do with the xbox\'s capabilities)
for some reason, the PS2 version looks "cleaner"
still... these don\'t really say much about the game or how the game looks like... gotta wait for some real screenshots...
-
i think the ps2 looks better, but the hands on x-box looks better
-
Is "The Rock" the dude that talked about Xbox at Gamestock??
If so, the PS2 version looks more like him.
I dont know about you, but why does it look like the rock is in 256 colours in the Xbox game?
(IMO)
-
The PS2\'s Rock makes him look old. The X-box\'s Rock looks a little more realistic. But the PS2 has the pictures looking smooth while ths X-box is jaggedy.
-
man the xbox version clearly is better looking all around.
-
THe way the Smack Down series is played, you dont need models with EXTREMELY high poly count. Take for instance the N64 WWF games, if they had the models from the XBox version, the game would be great. Since Smackdown is more "Arcade" like and has really fast gameplay, you dont need models like the xbox one. Half the time, you cant sit and stare at the models anyway in wreslting games....so to me it doesnt matter. I hate wrestling now anyway, where\'s Ravishing Rick Rude????????
-
PS2 Rock looks alot more cleaner and smoother than the X-Box Rock. But the X-Box Rock is closer to the Rock\'s realistic look, but the color is toooo 256 colors.
-
Originally posted by jaggies
man the xbox version clearly is better looking all around.
Everyone that I have shown the pics to feels exactly the same. The PS2 model is not better than the Xbox model in any aspect IMHO. The head on the PS2 model is too small and shaped weired, like beetlejuice on the Stern show. The Xbox model has the polygon count that makes his body look more lifelike and the texture looks more like natural skin than the SD3 pic.
[EDIT]I am looking at them again and there is seriously NO contest.
-
They both look good, but the smackdown 3 rock kind of looks fat.
-
Can\'t wait, I\'m having so much fun with SD2 than SD3 will be soooo awesome.
-
hmm... well I\'m taking the XBox model too... the body looks a lot more realistic, and more toned. The PS2 version does look a little bland in comparison, and DOES actually make him look a little fat.
As for the faces... the ps2\'s isn\'t quite right, and neither is the xbox
On ps2 his head is shaped were and his face overall looks odd, in the Xbox his head is shaped better but the face looks.... weird, just not right, there\'s something about it.
meh, it doesn\'t really matter to me about minor graphical differences, it\'s all in how they play.
-
The XBox Rock looks like an other WWF wrestler.