Author Topic: Moto RAXR vs Samsung Blade (Read 1748 times)

« **Reply #30 on:** April 06, 2006, 03:52:10 PM »

:liar:

was released in late 2004, but didnt come down from 500$ price tag till about mid 2005

nO-One · « **Reply #31 on:** April 06, 2006, 04:33:14 PM »

they fixed the price but not that stupid f\'ing UI

« **Reply #32 on:** April 06, 2006, 06:34:33 PM »

i got a slvr and they kinda lie by saying "THINNER than the razr" because when i compared mine to my moms razr, she tried to OPEN her razr and then compare, but its only thinner when the razr is closed. mines an L7 so it has iTunes and everything. the battery stays good too. doesnt hurt it much to drop it (

i have experience)

« **Reply #33 on:** April 06, 2006, 08:07:19 PM »

Of course they meant when the razr was closed

« **Reply #34 on:** April 07, 2006, 03:35:35 PM »

yes i understand that, but some people just...dont

« **Reply #35 on:** April 07, 2006, 05:38:40 PM »

not me

« **Reply #36 on:** April 07, 2006, 10:48:42 PM »

Quote from: mm

:liar:

was released in late 2004, but didnt come down from 500$ price tag till about mid 2005

oh boy, you fell into this one mm

Before it was released in November 2004, they had "beta" versions sold, originally black, released in limited numbers during may 2003. New York, LA, and Miami (and some parts of UK) only. These versions had a tendency to cut off calls because of a defect in it\'s clam shell design. I was one of the lucky ones who got a non problematic phone. Amusingly enough, they did not fix that problem a whole year later and gave us U.S. people an uglier silver version.

Not exactly 3 years, but close enough.

Hello

Author Topic: Moto RAXR vs Samsung Blade (Read 1748 times)