Porting PS2 game to the Xbox = Easy?

Originally posted by Falcon4
you have got to undersand,  130 fps, is IMPOSSIBLE on X box HArdware.... that requires such processor speed.... that x box dosent have,

Bull****. I believe Team Ninja a million times more than anyone here.

Originally posted by ps2hahaha


By looking at your picture there you need to get away from the computer and get some pussy.You are a single minded child that loads up on the valasine every time the cat walks by.HAHAHAHA judging by the number of post you have,I feel sorry for you.Go and get a life child.

That was quite possibly the most pointless post I have ever read in my life. First of all, judging people by their pic is stupid as hell, and his pic is actually pretty funny. Second of all he is a top mod and it is his job to post alot. Third and finally he is about 30(I think) years old and is married, you lowlife piece of scum fanboy trash. I feel sorry for you. Oh wait, no I don\'t. You go get a life, child.

PS2hahaha, you are a fool. You just come here to bash, nothing else. If you really wanted to inform people of the superior Xbox capabilities then you should do so in a proper manner. If you\'re reasonable, intelligent etc, then people are much more prone to listening. But that crap you\'re spewing out won\'t get you anywhere - except a banning perhaps. So take the advice if you know what\'s good for you.

Originally posted by Falcon4
...if you look at performance, not mhz. it goes gamecube, ps2, x box, dreamcast.

Nope. Firstly the performance of the next-gen consoles is based upon the combined power of the main CPU and the graphics processor.

Hence for main CPU only, the order is PS2*, XBox, GC then DC. For GPU/GS, the order is XBox, GC, PS2* then DC. In total, the performance of the consoles should be as follows; XBox, GC, PS2, DC.

*The PS2 fits in uncomfortably within these lists because T&L operations are carried out by the EE, not the GS.

How big (or small) the performcne gap is between each console on that list remains to be seen.

well, I as far as i have seen the GC has shown me better graphics than xbox (not that I like GC)

Besides those initial demos, we\'ve seen very little of the GC. For me, games like Malice, Munch\'s Oddysee, DOA3 and Halo together with demos like Inevitable Evolution (awesome model detail) and some of the sections within 3DMark2001 running on the NV20 (such as the Nature demo and Max Payne), have been far more impressive than the little we\'ve seen so far of the GC.

Going back to my previous post, there is nothing in the specs to suggest the order was wrong. Anyway, E3 is not far away, so let\'s wait and see.

Originally posted by Metal_Gear_Ray
well, I as far as i have seen the GC has shown me better graphics than xbox (not that I like GC)

Please tell me how much have seen. Are you and insider.? Man I wish I had connections like you have and could see all the nice work nintendo is doing, but seriously if you say that about xbox same thing goes for ps2 then, because I have not seen anything on ps2 so far that  blows dc away except mgs2.

it hurts me to say but im looking forward to X-BOX more than gamecube

[BizioEE]

Originally posted by Dr Yassam


Nope. Firstly the performance of the next-gen consoles is based upon the combined power of the main CPU and the graphics processor.

Hence for main CPU only, the order is PS2*, XBox, GC then DC. For GPU/GS, the order is XBox, GC, PS2* then DC. In total, the performance of the consoles should be as follows; XBox, GC, PS2, DC.

*The PS2 fits in uncomfortably within these lists because T&L operations are carried out by the EE, not the GS.

How big (or small) the performcne gap is between each console on that list remains to be seen.

Excuse me Dr Yassam...but there\'s something that I don\'t understand....
May you show me something tangible which proves X-Box is the most powerful console ?  (it\'s a sincere question...not a "provocation" )
...I mean...the NV2A has incredible specs but I\'d like to see what a P3(a 32 bit processor - cisk tecnology) + NV2A + Unified Ram can DO !
How efficently the X-Box can work with a Weak - Cisk - CPU ?  ...and how many data can the X-Box manage with unified RAM ?   Texture-compression,Z-compression and Vertex compression is enough to solve the "problem" of slow Unified RAM ?
In a word...can the X-Box manage more polys,more detailed textures,more physics,AI,and far more data required for a more advanced Game than GC and PS2 through "6.4 Giga/sec" ?
I think "NO!".....but sure I could be wrong so...try to explain to me      (be honest please )

Originally posted by BizioEE


Excuse me Dr Yassam...but there\'s something that I don\'t understand....
May you show me something tangible which proves X-Box is the most powerful console ?  

You  mean you dont believe Kojima-san? Shame on you...

[BizioEE]

Originally posted by EThugg


You  mean you dont believe Kojima-san? Shame on you...

mmm...I asked Dr Yassam to show me some other "non-BS" opinions about the True Power of the X-Box,like Kojima\'s one ....however...do you think you are Dr Yassam?
...so...please...if someone asks nothing to you don\'t answer !

Originally posted by BizioEE
May you show me something tangible which proves X-Box is the most powerful console ? ... I think "NO!".....but sure I could be wrong so...try to explain to me.

To be honest BizioEE, I have discussed each of the points you\'ve raised so many times already on this and other forums (including with you I believe) that I really don\'t won\'t to go there right now (just too much to cover in one thread IMO! ).

But if you like, I can post some of the threads where I\'ve commented on the same points you\'ve raised (it\'s a shame that many posts don\'t appear to be here on this temporary server though ).

If you like, I\'ll search the forums and post the links here.

oops