Originally posted by Ghettomath
I disagree Soulgrind. I think by America flexing their muscles here and acting on terrorism is makes the terrorist communities stop and say, "wow we could get ourselves into some serious -bleep- here." They might weigh the consequences and with SO many nations helping in this fight they will realize its a lost cause. It just that terrorism has gone pretty much unchecked these past years that terrorist think they will succeed, and usually do.
That
may be true for these Islamic extremist nut-jobs, but what about the other terrorists? What about the Hamas, the Tamil Tigers, etc? These are terrorist organizations born from oppressed/marginalized people - their lives are so cr@p, and NO ONE will do anything, they can\'t wage war because they might not even have food to eat, so they have to turn to terrorism to get their point across.
As long as there are marginalized and oppressed people there will always be terrorism. And that\'s the clue - sure, stomp out the terrorists, but also think about why they would be so dedicated to a cause that they would kill themselves to achieve their goal.
Instead of waging \'wars on terrorism\', \'wars on drugs\' etc, why don\'t the rich nations of the world wage \'wars on poverty\' and \'wars on oppression\'. Think of how many trillion dollars are spent on weapons a year around the world - if we just spent a fraction of that on making sure people have food to eat and a place to live then maybe people wouldn\'t go around blowing each other up.
But I digress with my idealistic ramblings......