Specs - XBOX vs. PS2 vs. GAMECUBE

Originally posted by OneGig
To the best of my knowledge:
Corrections in italics


P.S. I saw a side-by-side demo of Xbox/PS2/GC in an electronics store about two weeks ago. The only game I recognized was Star Wars: Rogue Squadron Leader for the GC. The PS2 obviously has worse graphics than the other systems, but it\'s a tie between the GC and XBox. My parents agree with me on this. [/QUOTe/]



WHO ARE YOU!!!?? LOL:laughing: :shy: :shy:

Its good that the X-Box is such an elaborate system but I haven\'t seen one game released by them that needed it...

So far I have not seen one game for the X-Box that I have any particular desire to see on the PS2...

They\'re going to have to do better...

My CPU is a Nueral Net Processor -- a learning computer.

[BizioEE]

Originally posted by Stupid Mop
So this means that my computer as powerful as the xbox cause my comp is 733mhz and 64 meg ram.
Cool, now I dont have to fork out more money for a xbox. I can just use my computer

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: ...you\'re joking right ??

I\'ve an AMD 1.4 giga,a GeForce2 Pro 64 Mega and 512 mega of system ram and racing games on my PC look like Crap compared to PG on the X-Box(a Launch Game)...for example...

Mhz and Ram alone don\'t make the same processing power,the same rendering bandwidth,the same effective texture bandwidth,etc,etc...


X-Box is a Console,not a "PC"...why people can\'t realize that ?  


...I know you\'re joking Vulcan Raven ...but there\'re a lot of confused people(most of all at TeamXbox Forums) who are trying to upgrade their X-Box...muaaaaaBuaaa...they are retarded

Originally posted by BizioEE

I\'ve an AMD 1.4 giga,a GeForce2 Pro 64 Mega and 512 mega of system ram and racing games on my PC look like Crap compared to PG on the X-Box(a Lauch Game)...for example...

Mhz and Ram alone don\'t make the same processing power,the same rendering bandwidth,the same effective texture bandwidth,etc,etc...

The question is not how powerful your PC at 1.4 GHz is, but how much the games for it is utilizing the power of it. I was very impressed to see Wolfenstein screens (needs a GF3 I think) and the upcoming UT2. There just isn\'t a big racing game that can match the power of the computer hardware - and I guess the talent isn\'t there either just yet.
Nice PC by the way... damn, I just can\'t play games on my laptop 500 MHz..

[BizioEE]

Originally posted by seven


The question is not how powerful your PC at 1.4 GHz is, but how much the games for it is utilizing the power of it.

Very True   ...not only PCs have bottlenecks but also developers have to make games which run even on less powerful PCs...

 I was very impressed to see Wolfenstein screens (needs a GF3 I think) and the upcoming UT2. There just isn\'t a big racing game that can match the power of the computer hardware - and I guess the talent isn\'t there either just yet.

True!  that\'s why I prefer Consoles !

Nice PC by the way... damn, I just can\'t play games on my laptop 500 MHz..

Thanks !  I need a bit of power for my Flight-Simulators... :fro:

good to know!!! i guess

this is a stupid thread. som1 close it.

Hey dont pick on him! he\'s just tryin\' to be cool. But i say thanks because i needed this for my homework.  So if you feel stupid don\'t because some one will come along and say "hey i needed that thanks".Just like me.

It\'s like watching a movie based on a game: a mistake.