From the Sydney Morning herald
No oral sex please, this is clean-living Singapore
By Mark Baker, Herald Correspondent in Singapore
February 18, 2004
Singapore\'s 77-year-old chief judge has given an earthy defence of his country\'s notorious prohibition on oral sex - declaring the law should be upheld to safeguard Asian standards of decency.
Sending a 25-year-old former policeman to jail for 12 months for receiving oral sex from a teenage girl, Chief Justice Yong Pung How said that despite growing permissiveness in some countries there were "certain offences that are so repulsive in Asian culture".
"There are countries where you can go and suck away for all you are worth," the judge said.
"People in high places do it for all they\'re worth. I\'m not an expert, but you read about it in the papers. But this is Asia."
Justice Yong was hearing an appeal by Annis Abdullah against the severity of his two-year prison sentence for receiving oral sex from a girl, originally described by prosecutors as 16 years old, but later revealed to be 15 and a minor. Under Singapore law, oral sex, anal sex and homosexual intercourse are defined as acts "against the law of nature" and punishable by up to 10 years in jail.
The Singapore Government has flagged a review of the law after mounting opposition and international ridicule.
The accused\'s defence lawyer, Surinder Dhillon, said the girl, who met Annis at a party, had later phoned him five times before he agreed to the date on which they had sex in his car.
While agreeing to reduce Annis\'s sentence, Justice Yong spurned arguments that the lack of aggravating circumstances made an extended prison sentence "manifestly excessive".
"Women are freer, they don\'t just run around the kitchen as it were," he said. "But ask any mother or your sisters and you\'ll get a different answer. No lady or woman would ask what aggravation is needed . . . the offence itself is an aggravation."
[/i]
Topic: Singapore! No sucky sucky? (Read 1129 times)