Author Topic: women who won\'t have babies (Read 983 times)

Paul2 · « **on:** December 11, 2007, 08:40:56 PM »

- because they\'re not eco friendly

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=495495&in_page_id=1879

« **Reply #1 on:** December 11, 2007, 09:35:31 PM »

how about they end themselves and save even more carbon!

good thing they wont have children that could be the next world leader.

Viper_Fujax · « **Reply #2 on:** December 11, 2007, 09:47:07 PM »

would make more sense for their train of thought to be

\'my child would be eco-friendly, and could change their friends to be eco friendly\'...now there\'s one less eco-friendly person and their one less child isnt going to reduce pollution since the majority is polluting the earth too much as is.

But yea..im always for stupid people not reproducing

« **Reply #3 on:** December 12, 2007, 01:11:22 AM »

This a radical point of view on life indeed...

But on the other hand ; way too many people have way too many kinds too easily. Heck, alot of \'parents\' need some re-education too.

To consciously decide to have kids, i will need some very good reasons to set forth my genes into, this sometimes, POS world.

« **Reply #4 on:** December 12, 2007, 02:36:49 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFlHdHv-VvI

Titan · « **Reply #5 on:** December 12, 2007, 08:57:54 AM »

I\'m glad she\'s not reproducing. There\'s enough retarded people in this world. We don\'t need another.

Hello

Author Topic: women who won\'t have babies (Read 983 times)