Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.Did you miss your activation email?
Oh, so in the way of content you haven\'t seen an equal either...
Originally posted by mm ??
Originally posted by Rikku Halo had a handicap because it got ported from PS2 (poor thing), and MS was hammering to make it a launch title for US...I\'m sure you knew that though...
Originally posted by seven LOL, I hope you have something to back this one up - because as far as I know, Halo was in the works for PC and PS2 at the time - so it must of really been a lot of work to port over. :rolleyes:That\'s how we like it. Get a game that runs 30 fps and then blame it on the "older" console: "it was handicaped because it got ported...". LMAO.
Originally posted by Rikku FFX was also 18 months into the consoles life...Halo had a handicap because it got ported from PS2 (poor thing), and MS was hammering to make it a launch title for US...I\'m sure you knew that though...MM, you\'d probably be alone thinking that FFX looks better than Halo.
Originally posted by mm nice for a brand new console, yesbut i expect morered faction had vehicles long before before haloMDK had vast areas long before halomedal of honor AI > halo AIoverall quality? like i said, its a great FPS for a brand new console, nothing more
Originally posted by mm errrrrr, all the time bro
Originally posted by Clowd Funny how all of PS2\'s best looking games run at 60fps, while all of x box\'s best looking games:halo, project ego, run at 20-30fps
red faction had vehicles long before before halo MDK had vast areas long before halo medal of honor AI > halo AI
Originally posted by rastalant If you want to compare xbox to ps2 graphics just look at both wreckless......lol!!!!! PS2 wreckless looks like trash......
Originally posted by rastalant Uhhhh.....okay. whatever. Doa3, project gotham, RAW, max payne, and panzer dragoon Orta are all 60fps with massive graphics. If you want to compare xbox to ps2 graphics just look at both wreckless......lol!!!!! PS2 wreckless looks like trash......