Rallisport Challenge on XBOX

lol, fastson

23 fps is the kicker, ehhe

23 fps is the kicker, ehhe

Actually I find the real kicker of this thread is you MM.
talk about double standards and consistant denial.

Watchdog has out proved you in every corner, you haven\'t changed at all have you mm, you AND watchdog remind me of the days of MM(you) and Triton(however you spell his name).

oh, so i guess you dont see the blur in rallisport, and think its intentional too, huh?

its trintius, he deserves to have his name written correctly
as blindsighted as he may have been, i gave him the most respect out of any person ive ever debated with.  he was RELENTLESS, kinda like watch, and thats why i like and respect him also

technically, neither watch nor I have  proved much of anything
we\'re throwing our opinions at each other, and entertaining ourselves.  should we be doing more?  

and why is "double standard" the new xbox zealot catch phrase?
of course i expect xbox games to be of higher quality.  the hardware thier running on is two years NEWER and easier to develop for.  xbox hardware (cpu aside) dominates PS2, no?  so you guys can whine and cry "double standard" all you want, my standards for the next gen console (ps2 killah!!!!1) are high.

now go slink back to yer lurker postion 256, thank you

now go slink back to yer lurker postion 256, thank you

LOL!

Still to this day mm, you continue to amuse me.

PS. What ever happened to souldgrind?

yeah, you should post more often man
i\'m always glad when people notice my slight humor and appreciate it

everyone knows clyde\'s the muscle around here anyways

soulgrind?  who\'s that?  *snicker*

no seriously, i dunno

Medal of Honor Frontline = A+? pfff, hardly. It seems like everytime I go up to a Nazi, he just stands there, intent on me killing him. Whenever a large blast goes off or alot of action takes place, the framerate crawls at this ATROCIOUS sub-30fps level. It gives me a headache just thinking about it. The textures are blurry messes and the game doesn\'t give me a feeling of wanting to play it. I will just wait until Frontline comes out on a system that can better handle it.

FPSs are for PCs, not for consoles! How can you even play this when you can\'t even use a kb and mouse setup? Not even worth my time.


Eric Jacob

damn, altered you are a complete hater

if this was an xbox game, you would herald is as the holy grail of gaming

sarcasm, mm. Some of those things have been said about Halo, doesn\'t mean they are true. Frontline is great, like the old MoH games, which I have ALWAYS praised.

BUT, judging by your critiquing of Halo, you should only be "disappointed" with this game. I am surprised to you even bought it, as AA is obviously the better game, along with the port of Frontline going to XBox.

and GUNVALKYRIE lived up to every miniscule of hype it had. If it didn\'t. you are a pussy.


Eric Jacob

and when have I ever heralded a game because it was on XBox. I praise games I believe will rock. Many I am excited for on XBox are either Sega games, or sound VERY interesting.

same with every system. I am disappointed in that last comment of yours, mm. You must see me as some sort of XBox fanboy, I am merely a person who likes to clear up arguments with a factual and sarcastic perspective.


Eric Jacob

I completely see where Altered is coming from.  Halo is trash yet Frontline carries the same traits and is hailed.

sigh

sometimes, i seriously dont think you guys read what i say

xbox came out two years after PS2, no?
then shouldnt i expect more from its games graphically?

but if were talking flat-out atmosphere

moh:fs > moh:aa

moh:aa  is quake 3 set in wwII

although i NEVER said halo is trash, its a great FPS that is marred by flaws such as SEVERE drops in fps, extremely repetitive, and zero replay value.  

halo is a creampuff, less cream, more puff

moh:f compels me to play it
halo just makes ya say "that was kinda cool, *yawn*"

[Bobs_Hardware]

Originally posted by mm
sigh

sometimes, i seriously dont think you guys read what i say

xbox came out two years after PS2, no?
then shouldnt i expect more from its games graphically?

but if were talking flat-out atmosphere

moh:fs > moh:aa

moh:aa  is quake 3 set in wwII

although i NEVER said halo is trash, its a great FPS that is marred by flaws such as SEVERE drops in fps, extremely repetitive, and zero replay value.  

halo is a creampuff, less cream, more puff

moh:f compels me to play it
halo just makes ya say "that was kinda cool, *yawn*"

now go say that at TeamXbox like some other moron did  

hell no, i refuse to even look at thier forums, lest my eyes be burned from thier sockets

errr, not sure if you called me a moron or not

Framerate problems are no where near as bad as they are in MOH.  Graphics are no where near as good.  AI is no where near as good.  The physics engine is incredible in Halo.  MOH has incredible sound, I\'ll give you that.  Multiplayer gives Halo infinite replayability (besides that how many times can you go through any game in SP?).

You cannot just make some crass comparison and judge one better because of their framerates.

You always say that xbox is 2 years newer and you should expect more.  Well, Halo looks and plays two years better than MOH on PS2.

But you said you would like anything with the MOH tag so your opinion can be tolerated.

Watchdog deserves an avatar...



Yeah, now we all will see where he\'s coming from.