I\'ve always liked MoH on the PSX, but this is the 4th version in the game\'s library and it\'s getting a little old. That isn\'t my big complaint about it, it has some neat levels, but I do think overall, Halo is a better game.
If people won\'t concede that Halo is better graphically, I personally think the framerate in Halo is FAR more stable then it is in MoH, then you have to admit that it\'s split screen co-op mode is magnificent. Sure, it\'s an old feature done before and the game is not updated in its story to handle the co-op properly, but it\'s definitely enjoyable in almost every way. I had a friend come over repeatedely for days to play it co-op until we beat all the difficulties.
I also personally think the textures and lighting in Halo are far superior and if you set up the two games running side by side, I\'m sure everyone here would agree, unless of course they dig way too deep to want to see something that is barely noticeable to a typical person, but stands out because people feel the need to point fingers. Kind of like how when the PS2 came out, it was ridiculed for it\'s jaggies and washed out textures.
MoH:F just didn\'t have the grip on me that the original had or even what underground had, but that\'s expected after the 4th sequel dealing with the same time period. Halo may be repetetive, and the only level I can think of where it sticks out like that in a glaring fashion was in the library, but I still had great fun playing it. For every repetetive section in Halo, there were at least two neat ideas worth exploring whether they be new guns, vehicles, sticky grenades or whatever that just game the game a load of fun to go through.
I don\'t think many people will agree with me on that, but it\'s just my opinion. I just think Halo is the better game graphically and it\'s just more fun. Like Watchdog though, I give MoH the win for sound, the sound is amazing. I own the soundtrack.
