actually, the picture quality of the PS2 is said to be quite good - and better than the average DVD-standalone player outthere. I really doubt that a $65 dollar "no-name" dvd-player can match the quality of any Sony dvd-player (including PS2). Ironic thing is though, most people on this very board probably have a crap TV and wouldn\'t be able to tell a difference between a dvd movie played on an Xbox, a PS2 or a standalone dvd player priced with 3 zeros. That\'s the hard truth, yet there are so many that **** around about "better quality" eventhough they wouldn\'t be able to really tell a difference. :rolleyes:
I\'ll give you one thing and that\'s user friendliness. Now that\'s where the PS2 seriously lacks and it obviously needs to sell that remote control for it to be more convinient for people to use. And that goes for any console at the moment and is also directed to all those DVD-ROM players out there. But who cares? A console\'s primary purpose is for games (well still is) and a PC\'s for worksheets etc.
Nintendo is obviously sticking with the traditional games-only route, which is not bad - however I feel that the market is slowly changing and Nintendo will have to adopt sooner or later (if they make into a next generation that is). It is no suprise that Sony and Microsoft are both trying to take the lead in the livingroom - that\'s why we have a PS2/Xbox with DVD-video playback in the first place.
Oh and Clowd. I see where you\'re coming from, but you\'re a bit hard on Nintendo. I mean, I might not be getting one either for the very same reasons as you do, but I at least respect them for what they do. Including a DVD-player would have been a bad idea for Nintendo since they
1. Don\'t have the necessary experience/resources
2. are partners with Matsushita who obviously have a great influence
3. did want to be able to compete against Sony (low selling price)
4. would have payed more (DVD license)
5. loose out on pirate copies
Nintendo did what they had to do. If they wouldn\'t have, I dare to think where they would be now. So as you see, Nintendo didn\'t choose to be cheap this generation, but smart. I do wonder however how they\'ll go around next generation... IF they don\'t go 3rd party.