Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 39

Author Topic: ~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~  (Read 21578 times)

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #225 on: September 22, 2002, 01:42:32 PM »
sucks to lose a close one, dont it jamas?
Logged
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!
Offline luckee
  • Resident Pimp
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7503
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #226 on: September 22, 2002, 02:29:11 PM »
KC vs NE..great game...
MIA vs NYJ..sad...
SEA VS NYG snore..
CHI vs NO..since I didnt see the game nore highlights..what happend luke?..my guess was that the O AND D feel asleep or something. I saw the score in the corner..20-7..the 20-14(getting nervous now) 20-21(damn)..20-27(shit) 23-30..doh..pissed
Logged
\"Booze, broads, and bullshit. If you got all that, what else do you need?\"-Harry Caray

Don\'t cry over spilled milk., It could have been Whiskey.-Me

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.-George Washington
Offline KillaX
  • Flopping in the H2O
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2673
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.bsatroop273.org
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #227 on: September 22, 2002, 02:48:41 PM »
Pittsburgh is going DOWN next week!  your\'e NEXT!  I say the browns spotted Tennesee 21 and then decided to play.........that was a nailbiter of a game!


:hat:ScottyJ:hat:
Logged
It is the Beast the Anti-slag come to live among us for and rule us for 7 years...the end is Nigh!

And I am a member if the G.A.P.
Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #228 on: September 22, 2002, 04:54:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by luckee
CHI vs NO..since I didnt see the game nore highlights..what happend luke?


well...

the beloved had a 20-0 lead going into the 2nd quarter and all was good.



then the saints marched down the feild and scored a TD on a good drive... then the bears fumbled the kickoff and the saints got the ball at the bears 5.... another TD.

14 points in about 35 seconds.

20-14

then John f*cking Shoop and his retarded play-calling made it so we couldnt score again untill a feild goal in the fourth...

here my imitation of John Shoop...

"hey, i know were throwing the ball all over this team, but i think we should stop doing that and just run for 2 yards a play and let them win"
Logged
Helloski.
Offline luckee
  • Resident Pimp
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7503
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #229 on: September 22, 2002, 06:30:52 PM »
While I was pissed that they lost..ish happens. Now that they have appeared to have stop doing what was winning b/c of an ass. I am quite pissed.

This kinda almost brings up another point that has been bugging me for a long time. Why is there a need for 1000 different coaches and assistant coaches nowadays? Seems that the list gets longer every few years as well.
Logged
\"Booze, broads, and bullshit. If you got all that, what else do you need?\"-Harry Caray

Don\'t cry over spilled milk., It could have been Whiskey.-Me

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.-George Washington
Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #230 on: September 22, 2002, 07:59:54 PM »
Har! I picked the Saints!

My picks are sweet this week, I\'ve only missed two. I picked the hopeless shit of a team known as the Vikings, and the Cards.

HOW BOUT\' DEM NINERS?

Can you say, 250 rushing yards?

Hearst- 98 yards
Barlow - 94 yards

Oh so very close...

And that Owens run, with the Jeff Garcia block? Someone please argue with me and tell me another WR that can run better than Owens?
Logged
Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #231 on: September 22, 2002, 09:56:04 PM »
Owens=best wr with the ball, EVER!

ok that might be a bit drastic, but damn that boy can run!  I nearly shit myself when he made that run..seriously, I put my bathroom break off, and almost put it too far off.
Logged
Offline Bozco
  • Tenchu Fanboy
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7043
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #232 on: September 23, 2002, 09:05:45 AM »
Its a shame that Moss doens\'t put forth the effort that Owen\'s does because Moss would be the best without a doubt.
Logged
Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #233 on: September 23, 2002, 12:22:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vapor Snake
Har! I picked the Saints!

My picks are sweet this week, I\'ve only missed two. I picked the hopeless shit of a team known as the Vikings, and the Cards.

HOW BOUT\' DEM NINERS?

Can you say, 250 rushing yards?

Hearst- 98 yards
Barlow - 94 yards

Oh so very close...

And that Owens run, with the Jeff Garcia block? Someone please argue with me and tell me another WR that can run better than Owens?


I could name at least 10 people listed at WR who could run better.  That\'s why they return kicks.
Logged
.::§hockwave§::.
Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #234 on: September 23, 2002, 12:25:18 PM »
anybody remember Tammarick Vanover from the Cheifs... he ran like a motherf*cker.

vapor your too young to remember him i bet. my point being that although Owens is a great running WR, there have been better, Jerry Rice in his earlier years was better, so was Vannover.
Logged
Helloski.
Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #235 on: September 23, 2002, 12:53:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by LUKE
anybody remember Tammarick Vanover from the Cheifs... he ran like a motherf*cker.

vapor your too young to remember him i bet. my point being that although Owens is a great running WR, there have been better, Jerry Rice in his earlier years was better, so was Vannover.


Yes, Vanover was great...too bad he decided to get into drugs with Bam Morris, and effectively ruin his career. He was good, though...

Tyrone Williams was another great one for the Saints in the early 90\'s out of Nebraska. I remember a game he played in against the Vikings - returned 2 kickoffs for Touchdowns, and the Saints won in overtime. It was teh great :)

See Yuz.
Logged
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!
Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #236 on: September 23, 2002, 01:36:41 PM »
Only great running reciever I remember is Desmond Howard from the Lions.
Logged
Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #237 on: September 23, 2002, 03:30:10 PM »
Sorry LUKE gotta disagree, I\'ve been watching football all my life, and watched Vanover and while he was good he had no where the skills of Owens.  If he did Vanover would have been a much better player that he was.  He was a mediocer WR and a great kick returner.  As for Rice, he had the best hands EVER...well I guess he still has hands, but you know what I mean.  Even though he had the great hands, he could still not run with Owens.  I should really know because I live in a niner family.  We have just about every game since 1980 on tape.  And Rice didn\'t have the moves, speed or strength that Owens has.  Unfortunetly Owens doesn\'t have the focus or hands that Rice had.
Logged
Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #238 on: September 23, 2002, 04:38:19 PM »
Yeah I agree with Omen. I\'ve watched Rice his entire career (a majority through highlight reels) and the guy didn\'t have Owens explosiveness. Owens is a BIG reciever. Him and David Boston are alot alike. Owens is nearly impossible to bring down in the open field, and his acceleration is ridiculously good. If you watch him closely you notice he doesn\'t even run normally, he brings the ball with both hands to his chest like he\'s praying and just takes quick gigantic strides.
Logged
Offline unfocused
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 483
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #239 on: September 23, 2002, 04:48:05 PM »
Damn if Marvin Harrison weighed about 20 more pounds I could make an argument for him being the best WR.  His speed and agility is so good, shook the hell out of Glenn all game on Sunday.  Owens\'s height and weight make him the player that he is.  He is much stronger than most of the smaller corners and can brush them off with ease.  How about that block by Garcia though...that was nice.
Logged
I have no signature...I rule.
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 39
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk