Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: ~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)  (Read 11888 times)

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #240 on: November 09, 2002, 10:31:55 AM »
That isn\'t at all true.  First of all, I have watched them several times.  In that Giants game, Duce Staley tore them apart, for a ton of yards.  The Giants just happen to be one the very best red zone Ds in football...I didn\'t see St. Louis score all that much on em either.  Besides, you were talking about them moving the ball anyway, so you can throw scores out the window.  McNabb never saved them from anything.  His scrambles were late in the game, while the Eagles were ahead anyway, and when the Giants were playing him differently, only because of what Staley had been doing all day.  It was Staley that opened up those running lanes for McNabb.  I mean, did YOU see the game?
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #241 on: November 09, 2002, 02:50:20 PM »
James, check the league, you have a trade offer.  I saw that your boy Boston went down, so I offered you a trade that gives you a bit more depth at WR.

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #242 on: November 09, 2002, 03:28:52 PM »
Last Week: 12-2
Overall: 80-52

Week 10 Predictions

Green Bay over Detroit
St. Louis over San Diego
Philadelphia over Indianapolis
New Orleans over Carolina
Washington over Jacksonville
Kansas City over San Francisco
New York Jets over Miami
Tenneesee over Houstan
New York Giants over Minnesota
Atlanta over Pittsburgh
Baltimore over Cincinatti
Arizona over Seattle
New England over Chicago
Denver over Oakland
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #243 on: November 09, 2002, 03:36:04 PM »
KC over San Francisco?

You sir, are a funny man!

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #244 on: November 09, 2002, 03:52:15 PM »
Here are my week 10 FFL predictions;
Winner in bold

Omen\'s A$$ Badgers
The Osmosis Kittens!
This is the game of the week, #1 vs #3, both with the same record.  Shox beat me the first week of the season, but I have a different team now, and I\'ll get my revenge.

Vapor Snake\'s Foot
Cloud345
A slight upset, though record wise this is a huge upset.  I think that this week just favors Vapor, and if Cloud doesn\'t do something drastic he\'s gonna miss the playoffs.

Nebraska Cornhuskers
Boston Mediocre
I\'m giving this one to James, but with David Boston out for James, it could go either way.

49Raiders
SouthernPimps -
Most boring game of the week, I give this one to the 49raiders.

Vid\'s Team Cocky
THE MOTHER ****ERS
A bit of an upset,  but I think that LUKE will take Vid this week.  LUKE has his 2 star RB\'s back this week, and Vid is missing soe WR talent.  It\'ll be close, but in the end I give it to LUKE because of Vids week Wr\'s.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2002, 05:24:47 PM by theomen »

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #245 on: November 09, 2002, 05:11:14 PM »
I don\'t know Omen.  Sure, you have a new look team, but I would never go and underestimate the power of an Osmosis Kitten.  They are very magical creatures, and where they go, winning seems to follow.  Besides, you aren\'t the #2 team :p
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #246 on: November 09, 2002, 05:27:08 PM »
corrected my typo on being number 2.  but then again, I\'ll be number 1 after tomarrow ;)

And if I beat you, and LUKE beats Vid, I\'ll be one whole game on top of everybody!  But then again, if you beat me, and LUKE beats vid, you\'ll be a game on top, and that will make baby Jesus cry.

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #247 on: November 09, 2002, 05:31:31 PM »
No, that will make baby Jesus happy.  Afterall, those who know the history of the Osmosis Kittens know that the original team name was the Carolina Jesus Kittens.  Then, to make jewish members of the team happy, it was changed to the Jesus-Moses Kittens.  After a while of saying that long name quickly, Jesus-Moses simply became Osmosis.  Strange but true.

And omen, look at the league.  Tell me if you are interested at all in what I offered.  I think that maybe we could work something out if we talk about a trade enough.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #248 on: November 09, 2002, 05:38:27 PM »
I saw the trade, and I sent a message along with my decision.  It\'ll be difficult for us to get a deal done, because I\'m pretty much only interested in getting an upgrade at wideout.  And because Harrison is averaging a tenth of a point less than Ward, and a tenth more than Conway, those guys would be a wash.  I have Holt and Keyshawn who I\'d package, but you probably won\'t be interested in that trade.

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #249 on: November 09, 2002, 05:42:54 PM »
Omen, I\'m not sure if I\'m going to get the e-mail.  I actually don\'t think the e-mail that yahoo redirects stuff to is accurate anymore.  I now use a yahoo account for e-mail, but a different one from the fantasy one, so I can\'t have it sent there.  Anyway, could you PM me what you said?

Also, if it would help at all, I could trade one of my defenses.  I have 2 of the top 3 defenses I believe, including the best one over the past month or so.  So one of those would be available.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #250 on: November 09, 2002, 05:50:39 PM »
PMed you

as for defense, I have both the 4th and 5th ranked D\'s

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #251 on: November 09, 2002, 06:02:16 PM »
To correct you once again, you actually have the 4th and 6th ranked defenses.  The 5th is Carolina :)
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #252 on: November 09, 2002, 06:06:56 PM »
I don\'t go by KFFL, hell they have Oaklands D at number one.

Tampa Bay (DEF-TB)
Green Bay (DEF-GB)
Philadelphia (DEF-Phi)
San Diego (DEF-SD)
Pittsburgh (DEF-Pit)

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #253 on: November 09, 2002, 06:10:37 PM »
Neither do I.  You\'re just seeing it wrong because no one has Carolina on their team.

Tampa Bay: 8
Green Bay: 27
Philadelphia: 64
San Diego: 87
Carolina: 91
Pittsburgh: 108
« Last Edit: November 09, 2002, 06:12:43 PM by shockwaves »
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #254 on: November 09, 2002, 06:11:22 PM »
correct you are, never mind.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk