Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: ~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3  (Read 14817 times)

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #150 on: November 17, 2002, 07:12:13 PM »
the Patriots are really frustrating me right now, they can\'t let Oakland steal this one.

Although, I believe, if anyone can make 4th quater comeback its New England. Who knows, maybe they\'ll do something before the half.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #151 on: November 17, 2002, 07:54:31 PM »
hehe the Pats are getting stomped...

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #152 on: November 17, 2002, 07:57:28 PM »
Jets are gonna be one game behind one team.  Damn, who woulda thought that both the Jets and Giants would be one game back of one team in their division after how they started?  Both have won 3 in a row now though, and are looking pretty good.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #153 on: November 17, 2002, 08:19:39 PM »
eh, not yet.  Remember the Chicago game.

Lets give them a chance.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #154 on: November 17, 2002, 08:41:43 PM »
OH YEAH!!! BEAT IT BABY!
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #155 on: November 17, 2002, 08:56:27 PM »
f*ck Kevin Faulk

Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #156 on: November 17, 2002, 09:04:32 PM »
and Jose Cortez.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #157 on: November 17, 2002, 09:05:18 PM »
mabye they could f*ck eachother

Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #158 on: November 17, 2002, 09:49:36 PM »
And reproduce really shitty football players.

Offline Black Samurai
  • RAMEN, BITCHES!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5073
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.zombo.com
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #159 on: November 18, 2002, 12:09:56 AM »
We should move the league to NFL.com next year or at least start a second league. NFL.com\'s fantasy leagues are SO much better than yahoo\'s. Seriously. SO much better.

I know this is a keeper league so maybe we could start a second one. Why didn\'t we use NFL in the first place?
[SIZE=\"4\"][COLOR=\"Red\"]I\'m sorry, That\'s not a hair question.[/COLOR][/SIZE]

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #160 on: November 18, 2002, 04:17:07 AM »
uggg, they still lost.

Anyway, next up Minnesota and Detroit.  Hardest damn teams in the league.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #161 on: November 18, 2002, 12:09:19 PM »
Gohan, are you ****ing kidding me?  NFL.com\'s fantasy football is horrible.  Yahoo\'s is better in virtually every way.

Actually, we DID use nfl.com in the first place.  The setup was so bad though, that even after having set a league up there, we decided to go with a yahoo one instead.  Yahoo is the best free fantasy sports site out there.  The only place that I would use other than yahoo, for free fantasy sports, is fanball, and only because of the auction drafting system they have.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline Black Samurai
  • RAMEN, BITCHES!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5073
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.zombo.com
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #162 on: November 18, 2002, 01:08:47 PM »
For real? NFL has free real-time scoring. League rankings, power rankings, weekly team comparisons, a better set-up, better stat tracking. League message board and chat. I can\'t think of anything that Yahoo does better. What makes yahoo\'s better?

Also, I can rarely log-on to Yahoo and my yahoo teams suck ass so I guess I\'m a little biased against it. Still NFL\'s is great.
[SIZE=\"4\"][COLOR=\"Red\"]I\'m sorry, That\'s not a hair question.[/COLOR][/SIZE]

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #163 on: November 18, 2002, 01:12:22 PM »
Yahoo has an easier to use interface, better drafts, and better stats when you use stat tracker.  It also does have a league message board, league rankings, and league points, which are like power rankings.  I don\'t know what you mean by weekly team comparisons, but you can see the matchups on yahoo.  Yahoo is the easiest system to run effectively.  And all the real time stats and such are available, on stat tracker, which is a great system, for only like $8 a year (which is well worth it, especially if, like me, you\'re in 4 yahoo leagues).
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ part 3
« Reply #164 on: November 18, 2002, 01:43:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by theomen
f*ck Kevin Faulk


Exactly. If he stays in the field of play, Brady could throw to Troy Brown...a 5 yard pass to Troy Brown, or 3 more passing yards from Rich Gannon, and I would have won in a winners league that I\'m in. Instead, we tie. God.

See Yuz.
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk