Black Holes.

What will happen if 2 black holes collide?

If Black Holes are like holes on a sheet that lead to another place of the universe my guess is that if they collide the universe will start compressing itself.....Just try to put one hole of the sheet into another.
Which one goes through the other?If behind each hole there is the same universe then imgine one universe trying to pull the other which is actually the same universe trying to pull itself.

[SirMystiq]

WOAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! KOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!
I READ EVERYSINGLE THING!!!!! DATS SO COOL!!! I WISH I KNEW ALL DAT STUFF!!!

Originally posted by SirMystiq
WOAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! KOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!
I READ EVERYSINGLE THING!!!!! DATS SO COOL!!! I WISH I KNEW ALL DAT STUFF!!!

Funniest....post...ever...

[Bobs_Hardware]

Originally posted by Bossieman


Well I can save you the work and tell you it is based on the fact that we see light from distant galxies to be redshifted.

I also read another theory some time ago about the universe expanding..

But I can\'t remember what it is  I\'ll try and remember/research it sometime and post it.  

Black holes are like pink holes, but don\'t look as nice.

Originally posted by Bossieman


This means applied to life and earth that all life is build of more protons than neutrons and the earth itself is build of more neutrons than protons.
 

I thought attoms usually have the same amount of protons & neutrons.

Originally posted by maindodi



I thought attoms usually have the same amount of protons & neutrons.

Yes, but the atoms and molecules that we and all life are build of has more protons than neutrons. Take humans. We are 70% water. Water is H2O. 2 Hydrogen, 1 proton in every hydrogen and no neutrons. Oxygen is 8 protons and 8 neutrons.
This gives the result that a watermolecul has 10 protons and 8 neutrons.
So humans are build of more protons than neutrons. The earth itself is build of more neutrons than protons. No life on this planet has more neutrons than protons.

You\'ve got some interesting theories, but I\'m still convinced that a black hole is something like: - a star that has used up its thermonuclear fuels, it becomes unstable and gravitationally collapses inward upon itself.  The gravitational force is so strong that light cannot escape from it.  We only know where they are because of the effects they have on nearby stars.

Originally posted by maindodi
You\'ve got some interesting theories, but I\'m still convinced that a black hole is something like: - a star that has used up its thermonuclear fuels, it becomes unstable and gravitationally collapses inward upon itself.  The gravitational force is so strong that light cannot escape from it.  We only know where they are because of the effects they have on nearby stars.

How come you are still convinced a black star is what you said it was? Is it because you have read what other people thinks a black hole is. Is it your belife a black hole is what you described it to be or is it someone else belife?
A black hole in todays theories are a consecvence of a mathematical equation, nothing else.

Originally posted by maindodi
You\'ve got some interesting theories, but I\'m still convinced that a black hole is something like: - a star that has used up its thermonuclear fuels, it becomes unstable and gravitationally collapses inward upon itself.  The gravitational force is so strong that light cannot escape from it.  We only know where they are because of the effects they have on nearby stars.

I agree with Bossieman.  This is a textbook theory as to what a black hole is.  Why I started the thread was to give your own personal opinion.  If you think it happened this way just because you read it somewhere,  OK.

I think black holes are another realm,  or dimension that cannot be seen.  

I have heard posts that black holes are moving.  How do we know this?  I\'ve watched what a scientist thinks is a black hole by some stars.  They took a photo of the stars and the probable black hole in August and another in July.  The stars moved with the gravity but the light that the scientist thinks is a black hole remained still.  How does a black hole move?  Has it been proven that they move?

Originally posted by Bossieman


How come you are still convinced a black star is what you said it was? Is it because you have read what other people thinks a black hole is. Is it your belife a black hole is what you described it to be or is it someone else belife?
A black hole in todays theories are a consecvence of a mathematical equation, nothing else.

I\'ve watched a few programs about space & black holes, even super black holes (thought to reside in the centers of most galaxies).  In these programs you get scientists & astronomers telling you their theories.

Now I\'m not saying that they are definitely correct, but they have been studying this stuff for a long time and have research passed on from the people before them.  So when I watched these programs and listened to their theories, they sound pretty convincing and are backed up with allot of research.

Basically you haven’t said allot to convince me they are wrong.  Are you some kind of astronomer?  Do you have one of these massive telescopes?  How convinced are you that your theory is correct?

Maybe once your theory and evidence are made public, people will look at the universe differently.  Until then I\'ll believe the people with the big telescopes and renowned professors like Steven Hawkings.

[Jumpman]

I want to put my foot in Clowd\'s blackhole.

Originally posted by Clowd



I think black holes are another realm,  or dimension that cannot be seen.  
 

Maybe Clowd\'s from another dimension.

Originally posted by maindodi


Maybe Clowd\'s from another dimension.

You cannot be anymore uneducated about black holes then this man.

I thought a star had to go nova before becoming a black hole  imploding in on itself forming a gravitational field nothing could excape.

I dont believe it is a dimensional tunnel.