So what if no WMD?

All I\'m wondering is how you\'d feel if Native Americans started on US citizens, I reckon you\'d not like it one bit and would want action taken.

It\'s would be the same situation but with a different set of accents.

lol, green
let me spill it out for you

american indians didnt target frontiermen UNTILL we encroached on thier lands, and used them cheaply for our own purpose!

"white farmers" are using land for next to nothing in zimbabwe and probably pay 3 cents a day for hired hands.

radical revolutionary parties see these "white farmers" getting rich off the blood and sweat of thier people, and no wonder thier pissed.  

guess ya takes the wind right out of the comparison, dont it?

I\'m not sure what to say to get through what I\'m trying to say, most rational things haven\'t worked, shit that\'s it, I\'m talking to Americans, rational isn\'t a good approach.

I really do give up, four members of these boards pick holes for the sake of picking holes when any five year old could read and understand what I\'m saying.

how long ago did you guys end yer occupation of hong kong?
yeah, thats real rational
you should thank americans you not eating kraut for breakfast every rational morning

yer trying to compare whats happening in iraq to whats happening in zimbabwe, and the US should go help the wealthy, greedy, "white farmers"?
:rolleyes:

I\'m completely ashamed of the UKs history.

It\'d be nice to meet an American that can admit to their horrific history.

Settlers raped and burned their way through thousands of years of Native American tradition, they attacked because the early settlers were in no way justified to be there, they just moved in and took it.

Originally posted by mm
how long ago did you guys end yer occupation of hong kong?
yeah, thats real rational
you should thank americans you not eating kraut for breakfast every rational morning

yer trying to compare whats happening in iraq to whats happening in zimbabwe, and the US should go help the wealthy, greedy, "white farmers"?
:rolleyes:

sorry mm\'y but action would be sanctioned to protect the REAL Zimbabweans from "President" Robert Mugabe who has butchered more of his own people than he has Rich White farmers.

in fact he\'s doing even more damage to the country with him keeping both home grown food and food aid from the people.

in short he’s a b@stard that needs removing hence the Saddam parallel.

i\'m not ashamed of UK\'s history, nor am i ashamed of US\'s history

green, in case you forgot, we left you.  we left yer religious tyranny that puts what saddam is doing to shame
but thats centuries ago.

they just moved in and took it.

hey, sounds like "white farmers" in zimbabwe

ooseven, how is that a threat to the rest of the world?

[CHIZZY]

we won fair and square, it\'s human nature. Get over it. Every human civilization has something to be ashamed about, if they want to spend their time on this planet feeling ashamed. I\'m just riding through space on this big rock for a miniscule amount of time. I\'m not gonna waste it feeling sorry for our species.

Either climb to the top, or get outta the way- I\'m not gonna wait around for you.

Originally posted by mm


ooseven, how is that a threat to the rest of the world?

did i say there was... NO !

and there is none not unless your Zimbabwean who has been arrested and tortured for no reason what so ever.

but than again what were the chances that 3rd world Iraqi, equiped with backward weaponary was ever a threat to the world :rolleyes:


the Iraq war was to get rid of a Dictatorship, nothing more or less.

WoMD is they are ever found are just another reason to justify the pre-emptive.

This conversation\'s bullshit, I could say 2 plus 2 equals 4 at the moment and I\'d get royally dissed off the face of the planet as per usual.

And to quote you MM "hey sounds like white farmers in Zimbabwe", I\'ll try another way.

Would you or would you not want action taken if Native Americans kicked off because they wanted their land back?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

but there was more

saddam is a threat to the rest of the civilized world, the leader of zimbabwe is not

Originally posted by mm
but there was more

saddam is a threat to the rest of the civilized world, the leader of zimbabwe is not

sorry buddy but your confusing

Threat to rest of world with

Threat to Israel (come on lets face it what country in the middle east doesn\'t want to see them burn in flames)

Threat to US political interests (which is fine because you felt threatened and need to act)

Threat to UK political interests  (which is also fine beacuse we feal the need to keep our special relationship qoing smoothly).

umm, we\'re oin the same page bro

I\'ll take the silence to mean you can\'t answer my question.

Answer yes and my case is closed.

Answer no and you\'re either very tolerant or lying.

Im still waiting for someone to display how Saddam is a threat to the world.

He hasn\'t been, still isn\'t, and if left in power, probably still wouldnt be.

Thats basically why I knew Saddam had little to nothing of importance or our intelligence and satellites would have picked it up.

Either way...it isnt over yet and he may very have them after all.