Must download audio..Man goes crazy about OS X /9....:D

Originally posted by mm
only a pure mac user would argue otherwise

Wrong again. I\'m not a pure mac user.

then you agree that macs suck

look up idiosyncrasies in the dictionary, you\'ll find a picture of a mac next to it

no sane person would choose a mac if a PC was sitting next to it

macs are only good if there is not other option, and even then, i would drive down to the public library if i had to

oh, and don\'t get me wrong. linux on PC > anything else

Originally posted by mm

no sane person would choose a mac if a PC was sitting next to it
 

i\'d definately pick a mac (if that makes me insane so be it),
unless offcourse the pc specs were P43.2ghz, 1gb ddr 3200 corsair ram mounted on ans ASUS p4c800 deluxe mobo, 200 gig hdd, MSI nbox-5900U, 22" sony monitor, & an M-audio revolution 7.1, all rapped up in a Lian Li PC 75 case .

a basic G4 costs more than that setup, tyrant

[Living-In-Clip]

Vid there is a reason OS X isnt truly backward compatiable. It\'s a complete new OS, nothing was taken from OS 9 to make the core of it. Thus it can\'t be truly backward compatiable.

[nO-One]

wrong

basic G4: $1,299.00
Basic G5: $1,999.00  
Top G5  : $2,999.00

Of course you can make them a whole lot more expensive, maxing out the 8 gigs of ram, getting a 23" cinema display etc...

And like LiC said, OS X is completly new while XP is win2k with a million more lines added to the code. And you do have classic still, all the apps that need OS 9 will load up in classio.

[nO-One]

http://railheaddesign.com/pages/various/PantherPreview/html/PantherPreview00.html

Here\'s a visual tour of Panther (newest OS X release). Everything\'s been toned down to fit with Apple\'s more metallic look (PowerBooks and PowerMacs)

And I friggin LOVE the new Tabs

and why do you think mac went with unix core OS?

[nO-One]

Well, they used technoligy developed by NeXT the company Steve started when he left Apple. Then Apple bought Next and decided to use their underlying OS for their next OS.

[videoholic]

Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Vid there is a reason OS X isnt truly backward compatiable. It\'s a complete new OS, nothing was taken from OS 9 to make the core of it. Thus it can\'t be truly backward compatiable.

I know why my stuff won\'t work, but try and tell that to an office of 12 people all using computers all needing thousands of dollars to upgrade.

That my friends blows.

So we fester in OS9 forever.  Hell I have a copy of 10.2 in my desk, but it is as useless as Freestylah\'s Penis unless I go and spend hundreds of dollars getting new software.

Ive never even used a mac and i found that very funny!!! =]