Originally posted by alliswell
You made some good points but on terms of passing, Warner outdid alot of QBs the first week. It\'s unfair that a Favre or McNabb can have an off day and people shrug it off but Warner gets blasted on a tough road game against a stiff Giant defense. Everyone has him in the microscope and if he doesnt throw 2tds a game like a few years ago suddenly hes a second rate QB. Unfair to Warner
Point is, if he didnt fumble all those times, especially the time in the endzone or on the Giant 5, Rams would have won this game easily.
The final point: Run the ball more, and Kurt Warner, if your going to get hit get down, don\'t try to dodge everyone.
Rams have a great team, just some silly mistakes lost them the first one.
Bulger or Warner, Rams are going to the post season
McNabb\'s night people can overlook to some degree because it was against the best defense in the NFL. That\'s almost expected. Favre lost his #1 and #2 WR\'s in that game, and his team still came close to winning. But the point is, Warner should be under a microscope because he\'s in a QB controversy type position. Bulger was better last year, so people are looking more closely at Warner. Also, I didn\'t see the Packers, game, but I do know that Warner just looked absolutely awful out there on Sunday.
And if you take away the Rams turnovers, take away the Giants turnovers too. Take away both, and the Rams don\'t win. Sure, if you take a losing team and take away all their mistakes, they prolly will win. Doesn\'t mean they were close.
Yes, they do need to run more. Why they don\'t is beyond me. Martz is a moron.
And you\'re not making the playoffs. Your defense sucks, and your offensive line looked like a joke out there. Even the passing game took a step back without Proehl.
