Author Topic: The infamous and disgusting"Goatse" on canvas. (Read 1083 times)

« **Reply #15 on:** August 19, 2003, 10:46:27 AM »

Distributing pornography to minors?

That site is the most disgusting thing I think I have ever seen. Saw it once a few years ago. Never again...

« **Reply #16 on:** August 19, 2003, 10:48:34 AM »

Lol... what\'s wrong with a little goatse...

« **Reply #17 on:** August 19, 2003, 10:58:17 AM »

keep laughing like you know something, spudz

yer ISP would be extra quick to act, if they sniffed a lawsuit. check thier rules, regulations, and fair use policies sometime.

posting pornography on public forums for minors to see is VERY illegal in the US. don\'t think yer cute and say "well...this forum isn\'t hosted in the US". it makes no difference when the person doing the post resides within the states.

« **Reply #18 on:** August 19, 2003, 11:00:29 AM »

well... this forum isn\'t hosted in the US

But wouldnt the moderaters more likely get in trouble? for not screening the users, and what they post better?

GmanJoe · « **Reply #19 on:** August 19, 2003, 11:02:15 AM »

Let\'s not put it to the test, Spudz. We\'d all appreciate it.

posting the real Goatse pic = automatic banishment

« **Reply #20 on:** August 19, 2003, 11:03:31 AM »

no, the mods and admins have no responsibility for what the morons do here. we lost that responsibility when you clicked "i agree"

« **Reply #21 on:** August 19, 2003, 11:08:31 AM »

but they are the police in a sorts correct?

and if a police officer does not do his job properly - he can get in trouble.
I know what you mean though- its a split responsibility, for us to follow the rules, and you to enforce.

I didnt think that it was classified as pornography. I thought it was some perverted artform.

GmanJoe · « **Reply #22 on:** August 19, 2003, 11:11:56 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Spudz

I didnt think that it was classified as pornography. I thought it was some perverted artform.

Are you talking about the impressionist art or the photograph called Goatse? The photograph is by no means "art". Holy mackerel, no!

« **Reply #23 on:** August 19, 2003, 11:14:49 AM »

well does this look like art?

Yeah Its classified as it- but it doesnt look like it. BTW: what the **** is it? its suppose to be seaglass.

Bobs_Hardware · « **Reply #24 on:** August 19, 2003, 02:46:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by mm
not only would i ban the person for posting that image here, i would report them to thier ISP\'s and whatever other local authorities

Oh, come on. You only gave EmperorRob a 30 day ban..

« **Reply #25 on:** August 19, 2003, 02:56:06 PM »

honestly that is disgusting

« **Reply #26 on:** August 19, 2003, 03:19:54 PM »

what emprob posted and that goat pic are worlds apart

§ôµÏG®ïñD · « **Reply #27 on:** August 19, 2003, 03:32:43 PM »

I decided to check out this goatse thing, well.... while the image was loading, i got half way down he\'s back. Let\'s just say, thank god for 56k. With that so called art pic, what no-one said and the slow loading of my 56k. I put 2 and 2 together before the image finished loading. Thank you 56k... :\')

Bobs_Hardware · « **Reply #28 on:** August 19, 2003, 03:48:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by mm
what emprob posted and that goat pic are worlds apart

I was sure that he posted the goatse pic. Twice, even? Or perhaps it was just a link to it.

Either way. (Sorry Emp

)

Titan · « **Reply #29 on:** August 19, 2003, 05:37:25 PM »

I never saw Goatse. A friend of mine gave me the link and I closed it fast thinking it was porn but never saw it.

Hello

Author Topic: The infamous and disgusting"Goatse" on canvas. (Read 1083 times)