##Racer##, lets go through some comprehension lessons:
Seven, I am so glad your from Switzerland and English isn\'t your first language because something has seriously gone wrong here.
We\'ll get to that later.
You ask how I came to the conclusion that the Xbox was more powerful?
Correct. To be precise, I was replying to this statement when I asked that:
by ##Racer##
I gotta dissagree with the Xbox comment. Most multi platform games are first dev\'d on the PS2 and then ported, and most generally dont take into consideration that Xbox is more powerful on paper... they just slap them together and ship them out.
I then corrected you by saying that such statement are very misleading and not very accurate. You then launched a personal insult by telling me to
learn to read (how ironic) and obviously made a big difference by including \'on paper\' which hardly makes a difference in the first place, since I was refering to \'paper-specs\'.
Then you go on off a rant on why multiplatform games usually look better on PS2m which at this point is totally irrelevant to the topic we\'re arguing.
At this point and following my reply, the discussion should have been over. It wasn\'t as you continued with the following:
by ##Racer##
seven, the proof is in the games, thats why I said \'on paper\'. Sure, Xbox \'on paper\' is more powerful, but take alook at the games....
So let me get this straight: you are saying that
Xbox is more powerful on paper and as evidence, you use the games you just used as proof to show how multiplatform games look better on PS2? Either way, your statement rivals the quality of a 5 year old, so I find such statements about english not being my first language laughable, rather sad actually.
After repeated attempts of asking how you conclude that the Xbox is more powerful, you always bring up the games. This however makes so sense as we are
1.) talking about paper-specs (theoretical max)
2.) games are for one subjective and are limited by the developers programming experties
and thus your answer makes little sense to beginn with, therefore the repeated attempts of asking. If you stay with your answer \'the games\' then I still would like to see how you reach that conclusion that Xbox games look better than the PS2 games. In average? Best vs Best? How do you quantify which console is \'more powerful\' when looking at games? Despite the fact that games are hardly a valid indicator of a console\'s performance.
Regardless of whether a dev uses ALL the available power on one console, and less on another, it still doesn\'t make the latter console a less powerful system.
Correct.
So why are you using games as proof that xbox is more powerfull on paper, when you yourself admit to the fact that games aren\'t necessarely relative to the console\'s performance?
