Best First-Person Shooter?

If your going to get Halo, get the PC version. Online multiplayer is what makes the game.

Cervantes, how old are you? I\'m tired of this fanboy bs of yours. Go get a job, get all 3 systems, and stop your bitching.

Originally posted by Soul Reaver
If your going to get Halo, get the PC version. Online multiplayer is what makes the game.

Cervantes, how old are you? I\'m tired of this fanboy bs of yours. Go get a job, get all 3 systems, and stop your bitching.

I\'ve got all 3 systems. I\'ve got a job, and I\'m not bitching. Merely stating what I think.

**** sake, you guys take things take too seriously!!! Is this forum your life or something? Do you feel that if you don\'t suck SONY\'s ass that the other forum members will make you an outcast?

Geez...

Originally posted by mm

and how many copies of halo were sold compared to
a. all the rest of the xbox titles
b. ps2 A+ titles

What does this have to do with anything?  I would expect more from you mm.  Sales mean little to how good a game truly is.  For instance-I\'m sure all the PS2 FPS sell quite well but none of them are anything above decent except maybe TS2.

sales > all

in the grand scheme of things


ask nintendo


oh, and MoH will always > halo

You\'re telling me that Frontline is better than Halo?  If so than I\'m afraid you\'re a complete moron.

Allied Assault is a great FPS though but is a completely different game.

how are they different?

oh yeah, moh didnt use the same 5 levels over, and over, and over....

Your arguement is weak.  MOH also was repetitive and did little to innovate.  The enemy AI was also rather pathetic at times.  I played AA probably more than anybody else here, but I didn\'t spend all my time having fun on the one player.  It just was endlessly fun beating people online.  Halo on the other hand offered a great one player that proved fun especially when going back on harder difficulties.  The multiplayer is also amazing with other talented players.

Oh, and I won\'t be bothered to explain how different they are. It\'s rather obvious with how each plays.

I would like to ask cervante what the "big" deal was with Halo.

Halo was dated (added little to nothing to the FPS genre)  ... repetitive (copy and paste level build)… and a chore to play (anything under 30 Frames Per Second is un-acceptable for a first person shooter).

Originally posted by mm

oh, and MoH will always > halo

If you mean in a world where good is bad and bad is good, where black is white and white is black, then yes. If not, then no.

Originally posted by cervantes
I\'ve got all 3 systems. I\'ve got a job, and I\'m not bitching. Merely stating what I think.

**** sake, you guys take things take too seriously!!! Is this forum your life or something? Do you feel that if you don\'t suck SONY\'s ass that the other forum members will make you an outcast?

Geez...

There\'s a difference between being constuctive or being a cock, you\'re erring towards the latter.

Seriously, if you\'re going to carry that fanboy mentality around with you you\'ll have to leave it at the entrance to this place. What made you think it was a good idea to come to a PS2 forum and slate the PS2 (at least have a point, don\'t just bitch)? You\'ll make no friends that way.

I agree slightly about the amount of crap games on the PS2 but that\'s because there are about ten times as many titles overall on PS2, it\'s all relative.

I\'m just saying, add a little reasoning to your posts rather than plain outright flaming (unless it obviously needs flaming).

Oh and I forgot,

Red Faction 1 - Single player and deathmatches both kick arse.

TS2 - A close second.

Originally posted by ooseven
I would like to ask cervante what the "big" deal was with Halo.

Halo was dated (added little to nothing to the FPS genre)  ... repetitive (copy and paste level build)… and a chore to play (anything under 30 Frames Per Second is un-acceptable for a first person shooter).

You were asking Cervante but I\'ll answer.  Amazing enemy AI, crisp aiming controls, great amount of multiplayer levels, and an overall well put together game.

Originally posted by Green Meanie
There\'s a difference between being constuctive or being a cock, you\'re erring towards the latter.

Seriously, if you\'re going to carry that fanboy mentality around with you you\'ll have to leave it at the entrance to this place. What made you think it was a good idea to come to a PS2 forum and slate the PS2 (at least have a point, don\'t just bitch)? You\'ll make no friends that way.

I agree slightly about the amount of crap games on the PS2 but that\'s because there are about ten times as many titles overall on PS2, it\'s all relative.

I\'m just saying, add a little reasoning to your posts rather than plain outright flaming (unless it obviously needs flaming).

Again, I said what I think, and I get a called a cock. I don\'t get it? Halo; amazing AI, vast levels, good sound, vehicles, good physics, different to any other FPS out there. ok, graphics were only 30 fps, but I\'m not a graphics whore. High framerate does not always = high fun.

Halo is good esp for co-op and when you put the difficulty on legendary , the AI is far superior to anything else I\'ve ever played.  One bad point is that playing online, everybody just 1-hit kills w/a sniper rifle so that\'s no fun.  But I definitely would not get it on pc.  Way too many problems.

I hated red faction, both of them.

There\'s a new game call SWAT I\'ve been wanting to try out.

Originally posted by cervantes
Is this forum your life or something? Do you feel that if you don\'t suck SONY\'s ass that the other forum members will make you an outcast?

Geez...

WTF are you talking about? You seem to be taking this system loyalty bs too seriously. I just don\'t see why you feel the need to lower the PS2 every chance you get and it is getting irritating. What I just quoted doesn\'t make sense at all.

   
EmperorRob, you just suck at Halo.