I think \'marriage\' is for heterosexuals only, but I think a similar \'union\' with the same rights, policies etc would be ok. The whole concept of \'marriage\' is a union between a man and a women, nothing else. This isn\'t to say I disagree with them having the same rights and privelages as everyone else, i just don\'t think it should be called \'married\'.
I also dissagree with them having children. If they were born gay, then that means they were born with the inablity to procreate. It certainly shouldn\'t be against the law, but I don\'t think they should be allowed to adopt as a couple.
I agree with you LIC. A child would be more accepting of homosexuality, but if someone was really born straight, then it wouldn\'t matter. I mean, for someone like yourself who is truly heterosexual, is it that easy for you to change and become gay? It works both ways. I still think however that a child needs both a male and female parent, not just influence.