Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Refusing a blood transfusion is completely different than making a choice to kill a child that would otherwise live. Like I said, under current law, after a certain point abortions are illegal and the fetus becomes a human being. With that law, it means that whoever kills the baby, accidently or on purporse, is responsible for the murder of the child.
No, if you refuse to let your kid have a blood transfusion, and the doctor says they will die without it, and they die, it\'s death by innaction/belief.
If she does the same with her baby, it\'s her choice. You can\'t say that one is morally ok because it\'s religeous. The fact is, that a cesarian is not a no-risk procedure, and it\'s up to a patient whether or not they want to have the procedure.
