Author Topic: saddams lawyer (Read 1909 times)

clips · « **on:** April 01, 2004, 09:55:52 PM »

i\'m surprised nobody posted about this yet. it seems whenever he goes to trial he already has somebody that wants to represent him...i can\'t figure out this cat\'s name but he\'s french. He was on cnn the other day and the cnn reporter asked him on what basis will you defend saddam.."he stated he would charge the u.s. with unlawful entry(something i stated way back in another thread

) and that he would charge that there have been no wmds found & that the u.s. was one of iraqs biggest suppliers of wmds..

i stated somewhere in current events that if saddam actually went to trial & has a strong lawyer he could have a decent defense...forget all the liberation & such..just the facts..the u.s. went to war because saddam had wmds..still to this day..nothing!
the u.n. did not justify the u.s. going in..yeah some will say the u.n. has no backbone,..but still it would have looked better with the u.n. backing them.

and let\'s just call it for what it was..bush had a personal vendetta to squash with saddam since bush sr. invaded iraq..add to the fact the u.s. citizens wanted somebody to get bombed after 911 & there you have it...

but i will say he will probably get nailed for crimes such as gasing & killing his own people tho...thoughts?

GmanJoe · « **Reply #1 on:** April 02, 2004, 05:22:39 AM »

He has no case. He has to answer to the Iraqi people first. They want to try him on their accord, not the UN\'s or America\'s.

« **Reply #2 on:** April 02, 2004, 06:56:04 AM »

/me wonder if a Mr D Rumsfeld will be up on charges for being an accomplice

Titan · « **Reply #3 on:** April 02, 2004, 05:58:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by clips
the u.s. went to war because saddam had wmds..still to this day..nothing!

I wouldn\'t say that. My dad is in the reserves and works with WMDs. They are finding stuff. The media keeps putting nuclear weapons as WMDs and that is what we\'re looking for (which we really aren\'t). A WMD includes a truck bomb, chemical and biological weapons (which we\'ve been finding) and the means of deliverance of these weapons. That is what we are looking for and that is what we are finding. People just keep making WMDs more than they really are.

clips · « **Reply #4 on:** April 02, 2004, 06:10:31 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Titan
I wouldn\'t say that. My dad is in the reserves and works with WMDs. They are finding stuff. The media keeps putting nuclear weapons as WMDs and that is what we\'re looking for (which we really aren\'t). A WMD includes a truck bomb, chemical and biological weapons (which we\'ve been finding) and the means of deliverance of these weapons. That is what we are looking for and that is what we are finding. People just keep making WMDs more than they really are.

i\'m not gonna doubt your pops at all but if they are finding stuff, don\'t you think they would be reporting it? As much of an issue it is, any info regarding wmd\'s would be reported.

Titan · « **Reply #5 on:** April 03, 2004, 03:07:53 PM »

I guess the reason its not being reported is for a couple reasons. One would be that the public view of WMDs are nuclear weapons. Them turning up chemical and biological weapons wouldn\'t be classified as "WMDs" by the public. But WMDs mean different things to the government/military than the general public. When we went in for WMDs, we went in for chemical and biological weapons. I had another reason but I forgot it. I\'ll post it when I remember it.

EDIT: I remember my second point now. The media classifies WMDs also as nuclear weapons and things that make a big boom and really are misinterpreting what the government really is looking for.

Blade · « **Reply #6 on:** April 03, 2004, 04:37:43 PM »

Even if he\'s French, there\'s no way that he seriously wants to defend Saddam.. right?

It\'s just part of the justice system.

clips · « **Reply #7 on:** April 03, 2004, 05:28:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Blade
Even if he\'s French, there\'s no way that he seriously wants to defend Saddam.. right?

It\'s just part of the justice system.

so you\'re calling this cat saddam\'s public defender? If that\'s the case,..saddam doesn\'t stand a chance!

public defender "uhm saddam..just plead guilty!"

SirMystiq · « **Reply #8 on:** April 04, 2004, 07:53:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Titan
I guess the reason its not being reported is for a couple reasons. One would be that the public view of WMDs are nuclear weapons. Them turning up chemical and biological weapons wouldn\'t be classified as "WMDs" by the public. But WMDs mean different things to the government/military than the general public. When we went in for WMDs, we went in for chemical and biological weapons. I had another reason but I forgot it. I\'ll post it when I remember it.

EDIT: I remember my second point now. The media classifies WMDs also as nuclear weapons and things that make a big boom and really are misinterpreting what the government really is looking for.

Yeah, it\'s all the medias fault. Damn that liberal media!!

Actually, If they had found anything, I\'m pretty sure GWB would of made a big deal about it and would of held a parade on it\'s honor. If a chemical/biological weapon was found...I think that is pretty much classified as "mass destruction" If they had found any, they would probably be like those they found that didn\'t have a chance of being used because they were so old...

I remember reading that Hussain\'s lawyer defended Nazi\'s and other terrorist. Wouln\'t it be funny, yet sad, if he actually wins the case and is set free?

« **Reply #9 on:** April 04, 2004, 07:58:24 PM »

10 bucks says that if he wins he lives in France for the rest of his life.

« **Reply #10 on:** April 05, 2004, 04:22:02 PM »

10 bucks says he\'ll be assasinated during the trial.

Blade · « **Reply #11 on:** April 05, 2004, 04:37:25 PM »

10 bucks says that about 5 minutes into the trial, Saddam lets out a loud one and snickers about it.

20 bucks says that everybody laughs, slowly but surely.

« **Reply #12 on:** April 05, 2004, 05:09:27 PM »

10 bucks he is let loose.

I have a strong feeling, that may happen. Why?

1) No WMD were found
2) He is not a terrorist
3) What America did, and is doing is wrong. Its their country, their dispute, their life, we shouldnt be butting heads with things that dont concern us.

SirMystiq · « **Reply #13 on:** April 05, 2004, 05:30:52 PM »

^^^
True. Felt like that since the beginning. But...[robot mode] He is my president...must keep supporting[end robot mode]

Iraqi invasion wasn\'t needed. I\'m starting to think that Afghanistan was just a front to get to Hussain. I mean, we have completely forgotten about Osama, until he blows something up again that is.

And how are the wonder Iraqia repaying us for getting into something that wasn\'t our business, well it was probably business that GWB had with Hussain, they kill our troops and are pretty much shitting on us.

« **Reply #14 on:** April 05, 2004, 08:00:19 PM »

I don\'t think there\'s any chance he gets off. It would just make the politicians behind the entire Iraq operation look entirely too bad. Especially when you consider that we have a conservative majority in the Supreme Court, if it\'s tried there, and it is the conservatives that would look the worst were he to be released. The Supreme Court is not free of such considerations.

Hello

Author Topic: saddams lawyer (Read 1909 times)