Fable gets....... at gamespot

i highly doubt its beatable the 1st time in under 10 hours

and its a rediculous comparison to begin with.  ico wasnt hyped for 5 years.  it wasnt hyped at all

we knew what to expect from Molyneux

And yet you throw a tantrum like the news caught you blind sided?

You\'re starting to convince me that you don\'t even know what your complaining about and even more so why.  I don\'t see how the 4-5 year development time affected your life in any way...though it\'d be truly interesting to see your arguement as I have no doubt you\'d convince everyone you have zero credibility when it comes to rational discussion.  You\'re basically just flinging shit.

ICO\'s average time for the first time through is around 10 hours, less than 3 when you know what to do.

I\'d rather you comment about Wind Waker since Fable is a little more related than ICO.  10 hours and 6 minutes to do almost everything the game had to offer on the first time through.  The only thing I didn\'t partake in was the color pictograph.  Now, argueably, the Zelda series is huge and much is expected for every sequel.  Did the length of Wind Waker or any other game in the series let anyone in here down?

tantrum?  and i\'m the one not excited about a 5 year delayed game thats 10 hours long?

I wasn\'t too fond of Wind Waker, but I thought it\'s length was just fine... I spent a bit more time with Ocarina of Time, but no complaints.

That\'s right, mm.  Just keep dodging any chance of having to actually explain your reasoning, or lack thereof.

i already have, its quite simple and not sorry you cant grasp it.  perhaps your too busy coughing up money for peter M?

My last name is Peters

Are you serious?  You think you\'ve explained why it is that you are disappointed in a game that you haven\'t played or how long it\'s been in development affects you in any way?  If you or anyone else can point that out I\'d be quite suprised.

Why have you dodged the wind waker comparison?

Just to let you know, this is as much fun for me as it is for you

how dare you compare it to wind walker
why you think i ignored it the 1st time

how dare you compare it to wind walker

certainly you have your reasons for this...

Originally posted by mm
i highly doubt its beatable the 1st time in under 10 hours

and its a rediculous comparison to begin with.  ico wasnt hyped for 5 years.  it wasnt hyped at all

Well from a gamer standpoint it is beatable in 10 hours.   Phil and I sat there and played it thru the first time and I\'m pretty sure it didn\'t take us that long at all.

[Living-In-Clip]

Ico was a piece of shit artsy-farty game that was boring and pointless.

Mark of Kri was excellent.

I\'m sorry - but unlike the rest of you, I could care less if the game sells well and I don\'t want to devote 40+ hours to one single game. When you have a life - that\'s what happens. You want a short game, you can enjoy for the moment. So, I will pick up \'Fable\' and be happy most likely. Then again, I\'ll be gettin\' it for free due to gift cards being given out at work , so I can\'t complain.


Move on people...Fable is here and some are going to be dissapointed and some are going to be happy..Move on.

"free" makes all the difference

Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Ico was a piece of shit artsy-farty game that was boring and pointless.

Just not YOUR type

Move on people...Fable is here and some are going to be dissapointed and some are going to be happy..Move on.

That\'s not the arguement, licky.  Calling a game a failure when it\'s not even out, he hasn\'t played it, and the reviews are solid is just about being a troll and I won\'t let it go without calling him on it.