The "United" States of America

^^
Seriously

Religion hating liberals? Its not these people who are running for offices. Most Democratic officials or at least those running for positions do not oppose religion. Its the bible thumping right that dont hear enough god talk to persuade them. Perhaps thats a bit too strong and to generalized and i do not hate religion. As a matter of fact i usually tend to not like those that rip it up as complete trash (though i cant say im the most religious person on this planet).

Anyway, its not the liberals in general that people need to worry about in terms of elected officials.

On the religious tip and voting for officials that might stand for something "ungodly":

If people can be born to two god fearing people, with hormonal imbalances that cause them to be feminine then i dont think taking a semi positive stand on gays should effect a running official as much as it might (if any of that makes sense). People may not like it but it happens and its been happening for centuries. People can fight that battle but to want harm to come to another person for the simple fact that they are gay seems a little too extreme and thats were religion can hurt this country (depending on your position on things i suppose).

sorry if this is off topic and doesnt make any sense: Its kinda late... or early.

It is not about hating religion....
It is about hating those who use religion in politics to destroy equality.

[videoholic]

Originally posted by theomen
fact is, the Southern states are too stupid to vote for themselves.  As a solution, The North East and Cali should make their decisions  for them.

It\'s so sad just how great the people of Cali think they are.  

That is such a whacked state with all of their tree hugger enviro dweebs.

Originally posted by THX

  I predict for the next 4 years you will still be here complaining how your rights were stolen, typing from your heated house eating a ham sandwich.

Originally posted by Black Samurai
OHHH...So NOW we need to care about what foreigners do.

I love how foreign actions/opinions are irrelevant to America except when you agree with those actions/opinions.

The only thing that "ensures" defeat/victory is Diebold.

The article pointed out how the Labor party in the UK overcame their far left and out of touch image - I don\'t see how this is listening to foreigners or caring what they say - it is an example of how one political party ditched the nut jobs and became more attractive the the mainstream.  

If you and other Dems don\'t want to listen to your fellow Americans... there is always Canada.

The reason the Democrats lost is because they tried too hard to steal votes from the republicans instead of playing to their own base. The Red states are NOT the mainstream. The majority of the US\'s population/money is in the blues states.

Originally posted by Black Samurai
The reason the Democrats lost is because they tried too hard to steal votes from the republicans instead of playing to their own base. The Red states are NOT the mainstream. The majority of the US\'s population/money is in the blues states.

A good portion of the population in so called "blue" states voted for Bush and if you are talking money - wealth tends to favor the GOP as opposed to the Democrats.  You are starting to sound like that nut Michael Moore...  actually you just paraphrased his post election webpage.  Go ahead and keep believing rural America is irrelevant.  :rolleyes:  Do you realize most of America is repulsed by the far left and their agenda?  I have said it numerous times - the DNC base has been hijacked by the far left and until it rids itself of those elements they are doomed for failure in 2008.
 
The Democrat base is out of touch with mainstream America.

Rid themselves of their base to compete?

You sure know your political strategy.

Their far left base is not the majority - you really need to learn how to read.  I said they will attract more moderates by doing so - moderate numbers > far left numbers.