Anarchy has nothing to do with social change. It has to do with removal of governmental authority. Of course, when applied in real-world situations, there is always social change that goes along with the onset of anarchy. And none of it is ever good change.
I don\'t really think anarchy is what you\'re really about. I think most anarchists, including yourself, are much more proponents of the ideal form of communism. Based on what you say your ideal society would be, it makes more sense. Ideal communism is one with one social class, and no central government. Some call it a social utopia. I loathe the idea personally, and though it has been attempted many times, it without fail becomes the communism we all know, which is really totalitarianism. Because as Black Samurai said, even if the whole idea of equality were applied and central control were severed, some people are still going to have more resources and power than others, and some will always desire. Thus, you get totalitarianism.
True Communism will never, ever exist. Marx\'s ideas are a failure. Humans will never be able to completely stifle their desires to compete and succeed enough en masse for it to even have a hope.
And as I stated above, I would never want to live in the \'perfect\' communism, because it is a life that would never allow for improvement and innovation. Humans achieve and discover for many reasons. Desire for wealth, fame, power all augment every desire for mere improvement. As long as that is a part of human nature, Communism is never going to work.
