Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Author Topic: avatars and Signatures?  (Read 7130 times)

Offline Jumpman

  • Legendary Poster
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7173
  • Karma: +10/-0
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #15 on: April 02, 2005, 05:10:01 PM »
one two, and three and four and you got served like a whore
Logged
Who is this anamoly we call Jumpman? How is he able to do what he does and still survive after years of torment? It seems he feeds on the hate, growing with an intense passion to put unassuming members in their place.

Offline Evi

  • Bah!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9032
  • Karma: +10/-0
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #16 on: April 02, 2005, 08:01:43 PM »
That doesn\'t flow well at all, Jumpman.
Logged
Offline Gran Dori
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #17 on: April 03, 2005, 12:25:43 PM »
well i mean like height of 150 pixels, and width of 450 pixels.
Logged
Offline Samwise
  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12129
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://151.200.3.8/~vze29k6v/you.html
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #18 on: April 03, 2005, 01:17:27 PM »
I browsed the Gamespot forums the other day. Ugh... I hate images in sigs, it\'s just awful. I like it neat, so I vote NO FOR IMAGES IN SIGS.
Logged
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAPETIME!
(thanks Chizzy!)

Offline Kurt Angle

  • Administrator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7922
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: Supes1975
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #19 on: April 03, 2005, 01:34:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Samwise
I browsed the Gamespot forums the other day. Ugh... I hate images in sigs, it\'s just awful. I like it neat, so I vote NO FOR IMAGES IN SIGS.


What if there were boobie images? ;)
Logged

Offline Titan

  • Sniper Kitten
  • Administrator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16572
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • PSN ID: flightlessbeaker
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #20 on: April 03, 2005, 06:02:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Coredweller
On the other hand, it\'s possible to allow images in signatures, but restrict the size so they DON\'T fill the whole page.  We have the same limitation on signature text don\'t we?  What\'s the difference?


We don\'t have limitations on our sigs. We technically do since if the admins feel if its too big, they go in and edit it and change it to make you seem like your a homosexual.
Logged
Liquid Spam of The Spaminators
"That took some balls to stick a gun in his pants." -Gman
"LOL u know id fuck yu wsboth right? i would love to fuck the both of uyouy

U R FUCJKGIN FCUTE" -THX to luke and Bob
"13 year old girls sleep with older men cause they think theyre in love
13 year old boys sleep with older women cause theyd be stupid not to
Offline Ashford
  • -=Short-Fuse Mod=-
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3184
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #21 on: April 04, 2005, 10:25:06 AM »
Pics in sigs for mods only...

See what happens when you compromise?
Logged
July 2002: If you had bought $1000.00 worth of Nortel stock one year ago, it would now be worth $49.00. Enron, $16.50 left. Worldcom, $5.00 left. If you had bought $1,000.00 worth of Budweiser beer one year ago, drank it all and turned in the cans for the 10 cent deposit, you would have $214.00. Based on the above, my current investment advice is to drink heavily and recycle.
Offline unknown
  • Radio Transmission
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3350
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #22 on: April 07, 2005, 08:51:55 AM »
one thing I hated bout this site is the no images in sigs rule. I highly doubt 400x150 size pics in sigs are goin to be the end of the world. When you guys rag on sigs in pics you must be talking about the unregulated friggin huge ones that take up half a page.

It\'s pretty easy to follow, maximum sig pic size is 400wx150h, if someone makes one bigger they get thier sig privledges removed for a week and if they do it again they get banned, plain and simple.

For everyone whining about sig pic size slowing down all the 56gayers, they deserve to go slow for still having that shit. aAnd like all the "hot babe threads" arent slowing them down but you know they\'re waiting for those pics to load with the KY next to them.

I think it would definatly add some more color to this forum if it was allowed, it\'s too bad there are to many fucking anal people.
« Last Edit: April 07, 2005, 11:00:29 AM by unknown »
Logged
\"So are you going to kill her off?\"
Are you insane! I love her character, she stays.
\"The only thing loves done is put you in this position, I say kill her off!\"
Yeah, but you say a lot of things..
and how does that work....  You\'re a bicycle..

[/i][/size]
Offline Coredweller
  • The War on Error
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5654
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #23 on: April 07, 2005, 09:23:15 AM »
^ What he said.

Building a web forum to accomodate 56kers is ridiculous in 2005.  It\'s a weak argument anyway.  A pic that is 150x400 pixels ends up around 11k - 15k in size if you pay even the slightest attention to the jpeg settings.  That is probably smaller than a normal banner image, and I\'m sure we ALL visit websites with many more images than psx2central.

Some say we would just get sick of seeing the same image over and over, but don\'t we already get sick of the same avatar, and the same signature over and over?  How is this any different or worse?  I don\'t understand why this forum has to remain in the stone age, when adding a little creativity and flexibility might keep things interesting.
Logged
ZmÒëĎwåCęЯ
Let the Eagle Soar!
\"The American Dream: You have to be asleep to believe it.\"  - George Carlin
Offline Samwise
  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12129
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://151.200.3.8/~vze29k6v/you.html
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #24 on: April 07, 2005, 09:32:18 AM »
I guess I\'m just old and grumpy, but I like the plain look. :)
Logged
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAPETIME!
(thanks Chizzy!)
Offline unknown
  • Radio Transmission
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3350
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #25 on: April 07, 2005, 11:02:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Samwise
I guess I\'m just old and grumpy, but I like the plain look. :)


Thats why you can choose to not have one ;), just because it\'s allowed doesn\'t mean you have 2 have one.

Seriously I think it\'s worth a try and hell if it doesnt work out just remove the privledge and it\'ll be like it was before.
Logged
\"So are you going to kill her off?\"
Are you insane! I love her character, she stays.
\"The only thing loves done is put you in this position, I say kill her off!\"
Yeah, but you say a lot of things..
and how does that work....  You\'re a bicycle..

[/i][/size]
Offline Lord Nicon
  • The Member
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4205
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #26 on: April 07, 2005, 04:15:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Coredweller
^ What he said.

Building a web forum to accomodate 56kers is ridiculous in 2005.  It\'s a weak argument anyway.  A pic that is 150x400 pixels ends up around 11k - 15k in size if you pay even the slightest attention to the jpeg settings.  That is probably smaller than a normal banner image, and I\'m sure we ALL visit websites with many more images than psx2central.

Some say we would just get sick of seeing the same image over and over, but don\'t we already get sick of the same avatar, and the same signature over and over?  How is this any different or worse?  I don\'t understand why this forum has to remain in the stone age, when adding a little creativity and flexibility might keep things interesting.

I agree with that first statement completely. Personally i dont care too much, it is just that sites that allow pictures in sigs carry associations to stupid forums/people in forums etc. so i can kinda understand  the sentiment of not wanting them.

I guess there are just a lot of low tech fogies on this site but this is in some ways a technology forum.

Meh.
Logged
Originally posted by ##RaCeR##
I don\'t have comprehension issues, you just need to learn how to communicate.
Yessir massir ima f*** you up reeeeal nice and homely like. uh huh, yessum ; ).
Debra Lafave Is My Hero ;) lol
Offline Eiksirf
  • **E!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4398
  • Karma: +10/-0
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #27 on: April 07, 2005, 04:56:45 PM »
Always gotta make sites with low end users in mind.

Besides, I don\'t read your sigs now, I don\'t want to have pictures in the way, too.

-Dan
Logged
\"What are you supposed to be, a clown or something?\"
\"Sometimes.\"
 
http://videogamer.today.com
Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #28 on: April 07, 2005, 05:21:21 PM »
bandwidth was never an issue for sig pics

i just don\'t want to see them 10 times in a thread

therefore, we will never have them
Logged
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

Offline videoholic

  • Silly little freak
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18034
  • Karma: +10/-0
avatars and Signatures?
« Reply #29 on: April 07, 2005, 06:43:56 PM »
I agree with mm.

Any site I go on that has them, the first thing I do is delete them.
Logged
I wear a necklace now because I like to know when I\'m upside down.
 kopking: \"i really think that i how that guy os on he weekend\"
TheOmen speaking of women: \"they\'re good at what they do, for what they are.\"
Swifdi:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk