Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.Did you miss your activation email?
AMD didn\'t send out any Athlon 64 X2 processors for this review, they promised us chips for the real launch in June - but we don\'t like waiting and neither do most of you, so we improvised.The Opteron x75 CPUs AMD sent us run at 2.2GHz and have a 1MB L2 cache per core, which makes the specs basically identical to the Athlon 64 X2 4400+. Although the use of ECC memory and a workstation motherboard would inevitably mean that performance will be slower than when the real Athlon 64 X2s launch, its close enough to get a good idea of how competitive the Athlon 64 X2 will be.
The days of AMD losing the encoding comparisons are over - the Athlon 64 X2 4400+ offers encoding performance that rivals the Pentium D 840. Unfortunately at the sub-$500 level, AMD remains fairly non-competitive in encoding performance.
Originally posted by JBean can\'t imagine a chip hotter than a dual core... especially when it\'s made by intelGlad AMD is making their dual core chips compatible with their existing socket 939 & 940, don\'t you need a whole new board and socket for intels dual core cpus?too bad is seems you won\'t see any real benefit from having 2 cores until software is designed to share the data effectively between the two.