Originally posted by THX
gman have u seen any real lesbos? They are ugly as sin.
http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=portia+de+rossi/v=2/SID=e/TID=I040_85/l=IVS/SIG=133q9t4nh/EXP=1115331100/*-http%3A//www.ferristech.net/users/mcever/journal/archives/Portia%20De%20Rossi.bmp^not ugly as sin.
Anyway, I never get it when people fall back on "but it\'s not natural." If anything nature is ripe with proof that "unnatural" behaviour is quite common if not "natural" itself.
As far as comparing us to animals, we\'re just as into instant gratification as animals are. Infact humans are the poster child of excessive gratification behaviours, in spite of our knowing better.
Capacity plays into it.
We have the unique ability for the most part of being able to take a stand offish approach and be selective about our behaviour unlike, for example, a dog.
That doesn\'t change the fact that the drive is still there.
And the degree in which we can deal with those compulsions is a luxury not everyone has either. There are a slew of mental conditions that people are aware they have, but lack the ability to do anything about it.
One\'s objection to homosexuality is based on nothing more than their own moral perspective. I suppose it\'s comforting to know that some people out there have it all figured out so they can point the rest of us the right direction.
![tongue5 :p](https://psx5central.com/community/Smileys/PSX4Central/tongue5.gif)
EDIT: As for the topic, I say let them have their civil unions. Love is not exclusive between a man and a woman, and the benefits of marriage shouldn\'t be either.
EDIT2: Before any of you reply with "then what keeps us from letting a person marry a goat or a man marry a nine year old girl" then I say, because the idea of a civil union is between two consenting adults. <-- Read that carefully, those last two words are important.