Author Topic: King Kong (Read 2948 times)

« **Reply #30 on:** December 17, 2005, 05:23:38 PM »

Story takes too long to develop and conclude.

The third LOTR for example, even after everything is done (wars are won, ring destroyed, etc.) it continues to go on and and on and on and...

videoholic · « **Reply #31 on:** December 17, 2005, 06:52:00 PM »

Well the third Lotr had to wrap up the other 2 movies.

« **Reply #32 on:** December 18, 2005, 01:07:31 AM »

So?

No excuse for me almost falling asleep...

Living-In-Clip · « **Reply #33 on:** December 18, 2005, 05:14:47 AM »

You need an excuse?
How about this.
Short attention span.

Blade · « **Reply #34 on:** December 18, 2005, 05:33:13 AM »

Peter Jackson was in the right at the right time and that\'s why he\'s now able to make $200+ million dollar films left and right.

He\'s a good director, but the guy is clearly overrated. He can.. not.. edit..

« **Reply #35 on:** December 18, 2005, 07:34:59 AM »

I thought to tell the complete story that it was a good length for the movie, it developed all the characters well and told a complete story as opposed to not developing the characters and just using a lot of action scenes and cgi and shortening the movie would have sucked, it really drew you in and made you feel bad for Kong at the end.

Living-In-Clip · « **Reply #36 on:** December 18, 2005, 07:44:17 AM »

Overrated?

The Frighteners?
Dead Alive?
Lotr?
King Kong?
Bad Taste?

WTTTTTTTTTTTTTFFFFFFF?

GmanJoe · « **Reply #37 on:** December 18, 2005, 09:41:20 AM »

Bad editor? Peter Jackson?

LOTR is a huge task to edit considering it\'s a 48 hour movie from beginning to end. He had to edit the story that would flow perfectly for a movie version. Then he had to cut down further to make them under 3 and half hours, each.

He then had to move certain events in the book to earlier spot and some later to get a better flow in the movie.

With literally a billion LOTR fans expecting nothing less than perfect, I\'d say the majority feel Jackson edited the entire story just right.

Bad editor? Nononononono.

Blade · « **Reply #38 on:** December 18, 2005, 10:58:38 AM »

Dead-Alive has ass-horrible editing.

I never said he was a bad director, he is good.. just not in the class of any of my favorite directors. Not yet, anyway.

Living-In-Clip · « **Reply #39 on:** December 18, 2005, 11:17:19 AM »

Alright.. I just can\'t believe you bad mouthed Dead-Alive.

You ....well...You....you....you\'re....a..uhm..

POOPIE HEAD!

Evi · « **Reply #40 on:** December 18, 2005, 11:55:00 AM »

I just saw this movie last night. It was pretty damn cool except that really corny ass part where [sp]King Kong and the girl were playing on the fucking ice. GHEY!![/sp]

And the ending dragged on for way too damn long.

[sp]The scene where King Kong takes on 3 T-Rex\'s was pretty damn cool. Especially where he rips open the jaws of one, and then starts playing with the mouth.[/sp]

Some parts of the movie I could have completely done without.

Quote

No excuse for me almost falling asleep...

Maybe you shouldn\'t smoke weed before going to movies.

Blade · « **Reply #41 on:** December 18, 2005, 02:18:16 PM »

Quote

the ending dragged on for way too damn long

Man, I really hope this doesn\'t start being a Jackson trademark.

« **Reply #42 on:** December 18, 2005, 02:57:32 PM »

Oh...

It will.

Living-In-Clip · « **Reply #43 on:** December 18, 2005, 03:21:51 PM »

I don\'t think it dragged on. Yes, the airplane scene was a bit long, but the rest was needed. The ice scene rocked, damnit.

Evi · « **Reply #44 on:** December 18, 2005, 03:43:50 PM »

Quote

Yes, the airplane scene was a bit long

That\'s the part I was referring to.

Hello

Author Topic: King Kong (Read 2948 times)