Folding@Home - PS3s reach one month quota in 1 day

[GmanJoe]

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/breaking-ps3-folding-ps3-triples-folding-at-homes-computing-power-to-over-500-tflopspflops-in-spitting-range-246664.php

This is freaking amazing. I was checking out some message boards last night at the Folding Forums at Stanford, a group that tracks the Folding at Home application. You know, that\'s the software that runs on Sony PS3 or PS2 gaming consoles, all linking up over the Internet and using their spare cycles to help the university process vast amounts of Alzheimers research data? To my astonishment, I discovered that a small legion of 13,000 PS3s running the Folding at Home app account for most of the computing power in the project, amounting to about 56 percent (PS3s = 316 measured TFLOPS) of the total.

On average, between the superfast and superslow PCs, 159,033 PCs are only doing about half that much. (151 TFLOPS). Essentially, 13,000 PS3s have just made the Folding at Home Project the fastest distributed computing project on the planet, ever. (I believe it used to be SETI @ Home, which was something like 280 TFLOPS.) This also means the PS3 met Stanford professor Vijay Pande\'s expected one-month goal in one day. (We\'ll update this post with confirmation once Dr. Pande gets back to us.)

The project just needs about 18,000 more PS3s participating to make the Folding at Home project the first distributed computing project to hit a Petaflop. To put that into perspective, the Japanese MDGRAPE-3, RIKEN\'s supercomputer, has about a Petaflop of computing power.

And the potential goes on from there. There are 2 million PS3s in the wild, and over 100 million PS2s shipped thus far. PS3 owners, what are you waiting for? Get the word out to other PS3 owners. Let\'s help cure Alzheimer\'s disease. –Brian Lam

What?

[Titan]

this is old dude.

[Evi]

No, SETI is old. This is new.

So.. PS3s must be a lot faster than a typicaly PC, if they are doing twice the number of TFLOPS with 1/12th the number of boxes.
 
Or maybe they just have a lot more unused processor cycles because they don\'t have to support a flabby operating system like MS Windows?

[GmanJoe]

So.. PS3s must be a lot faster than a typicaly PC, if they are doing twice the number of TFLOPS with 1/12th the number of boxes.
 
Or maybe they just have a lot more unused processor cycles because they don\'t have to support a flabby operating system like MS Windows?

My Mac Pro is dog slow compared to the PS3. Not sure how the program is utilizing the 4 processors. It took about 1 day of processing to get to 15% done comared to the PS3\'s 7 hours to get the whole work unit accomplished.