Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!  (Read 22748 times)

Offline Halberto
  • \'99, \'03, \'05, \'07
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6599
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #105 on: October 08, 2007, 09:33:32 PM »
You don\'t think that maybe the cowboys defense had anything to do with it? The bills don\'t have a running game, but their rookie quarterback is looking good.

Zero chance? Bite your tongue.

Offline Raz The Friggin Grea
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #106 on: October 09, 2007, 03:23:17 AM »
Quote from: Halberto
You don\'t think that maybe the cowboys defense had anything to do with it? The bills don\'t have a running game, but their rookie quarterback is looking good.

Zero chance? Bite your tongue.


The Cowboys have over inflated stats , due to the fact they have been playing losing teams this season. Let\'s see them go against a great team like the Colts of New England, if they win those games, then I\'ll believe that this is a team that could go somewhere.
My Hi-Def movie collection (much smaller than the SD one).

http://www.dvdspot.com/list.php?member=LivingInClip&list=owned
My Q-Server, Team Fortress 2 stats



Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #107 on: October 09, 2007, 03:53:29 AM »
Romo will be a no show against the Pats. I hate the Pats, but I hate the Cowboys more. Plus, Cowboys fans are racist.

[SIZE="10"]RACIST![/SIZE]
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline Raz The Friggin Grea
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #108 on: October 09, 2007, 04:13:01 AM »
Quote
You don\'t think that maybe the cowboys defense had anything to do with it? The bills don\'t have a running game, but their rookie quarterback is looking good.

I still don\'t know why you even wrote that. You are trying to say that maybe the Cowboy\'s defense had something to do with the lack of points that the Bills put out, but at the same time, you made make mention of the fact that the Bills don\'t have a running game and are using a rookie QB.
My Hi-Def movie collection (much smaller than the SD one).

http://www.dvdspot.com/list.php?member=LivingInClip&list=owned
My Q-Server, Team Fortress 2 stats



Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #109 on: October 09, 2007, 04:31:34 AM »
Quote from: Raz The Friggin Grea
I still don\'t know why you even wrote that. You are trying to say that maybe the Cowboy\'s defense had something to do with the lack of points that the Bills put out, but at the same time, you made make mention of the fact that the Bills don\'t have a running game and are using a rookie QB.


Perhaps he was making a rhetorical question and then answering himself? :laughing:
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline clips

  • In ChArGe..Ya DiG?!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7807
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: Blackgas7
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #110 on: October 09, 2007, 07:04:34 AM »
The defense did have something to do with it...the only time the bills really scored was off of dallas mistakes and that one punt return...other than that the dallas "D" remained aggressive throughout the whole game regardless of Romo\'s performance, I also think the way the team kept hangin\' in there for Romo *you kept seein guys talkin\' to him* kept his confidence level up a bit, but make no mistake he played like Rex Grossman times ten!

It was a full team effort...Romo made the plays when he needed to and the "D" did it\'s part as well and the thing is even when people thought that dallas was out of it, they kept on the playin\' to the very end, and that is a sign of a maturing super bowl bound team. I say maturing because While Romo is good, he still comes outta nowhere and makes rookie-like mistakes like he did last night...anytime you could win a game like that with so many turnovers, you gotta thank your defense for holdin\' them and takin\' some of that momemtum away from what was a clutch win for the bills.

And the Pats better not sleep, This is a team that defeated the undefeated colts of last year Raz, pretty impressive if you ask me,...Dallas may not be quite up there on the skill/maturity level of the Colts or Pats just yet, but they are pretty darn close.
knowledge, wisdom & understanding..these are the basic fundamentals of life

if you can\'t amaze them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh*t....

Offline Halberto
  • \'99, \'03, \'05, \'07
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6599
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #111 on: October 10, 2007, 11:38:22 AM »
To say that the cowboys only look good because they are playing bad teams is just stupid. You can say the same thing about the patriots:

New England\'s opposition has a combined record of 7-17. The Cowboys have faced teams that are 6-19 overall.

Offline Raz The Friggin Grea
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #112 on: October 14, 2007, 04:18:02 PM »
Quote from: Halberto
To say that the cowboys only look good because they are playing bad teams is just stupid. You can say the same thing about the patriots:

New England\'s opposition has a combined record of 7-17. The Cowboys have faced teams that are 6-19 overall.


Well, minus the fact that New England just SPANKED the Cowgirls.
My Hi-Def movie collection (much smaller than the SD one).

http://www.dvdspot.com/list.php?member=LivingInClip&list=owned
My Q-Server, Team Fortress 2 stats



Offline Halberto
  • \'99, \'03, \'05, \'07
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6599
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #113 on: October 14, 2007, 06:12:18 PM »
Spank is a little strong. Atleast they put up the biggest fight and were the first team to lead them in the second half.

We\'re still not at full strength, so I\'m fine with the loss.

Offline Raz The Friggin Grea
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #114 on: October 14, 2007, 06:59:32 PM »
Quote from: Halberto
Spank is a little strong. Atleast they put up the biggest fight and were the first team to lead them in the second half.

We\'re still not at full strength, so I\'m fine with the loss.


No, spank is a good word. New England got ahead and let their guard down. Once Dallas pulled ahead, New England kicked it in high gear and finished them off easily.
My Hi-Def movie collection (much smaller than the SD one).

http://www.dvdspot.com/list.php?member=LivingInClip&list=owned
My Q-Server, Team Fortress 2 stats



Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #115 on: October 14, 2007, 07:47:50 PM »
still not at full strength,lol.

they lost because they are a worse team. The patriots didnt have 2 RB\'s or seymore. I hate the patriots, but if both teams had all theyre players, patriots would still beat them with ease.

AFC best>>>>>>>>>>>NFC best
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline Halberto
  • \'99, \'03, \'05, \'07
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6599
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #116 on: October 14, 2007, 08:12:16 PM »
Well that\'s your opinion Raz.

I\'m proud of my boys. They rushed Brady pretty well and gave them no running game. The reason I say we weren\'t 100% is because at the areas that caused us to lose, we were missing key players. When Glenn gets back you can expect more points, and Anthony Henry was sorely missed. With him in instead of Reeves (the joke CB of the NFL) tonight could have been completely different.

Offline Raz The Friggin Grea
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #117 on: October 14, 2007, 09:04:38 PM »
Don\'t get me wrong, the Cowboys are a fine team, I just don\'t think they have what it takes to win the big games. Granted, this is just a regular season game, but in the minds of the public and the players, this was a big game for them and they choked. You could tell they choked, because of all the careless penalties they racked up during the course of the game. A lot of those were nothing but careless mistakes, things that should never happen, especially during a home game. When that happens, you can\'t attribute the loss to the fact you\'re missing Glenn or Henry.

And when you say, "gave them no running game" are you taking into consideration two very important facts?

1: New England\'s starter, Laurence Maroney was out.

2: Even without a running game the Patriots racked up 40 + points.  

So, look at that again and say it.  When you say that they kept them from running the ball, you\'re just pointing out the fact that an offense used one dimension to totally dominate the Dallas Cowboys.

Quick stat check.

New England rushing yards - 75

New England Passing Yards - 373   

Sure, there was not much a running game, but when you throw for almost 400 yards and are scoring , who needs to run the ball?
« Last Edit: October 14, 2007, 09:12:04 PM by Raz The Friggin Grea »
My Hi-Def movie collection (much smaller than the SD one).

http://www.dvdspot.com/list.php?member=LivingInClip&list=owned
My Q-Server, Team Fortress 2 stats



Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #118 on: October 14, 2007, 09:27:00 PM »
Quote from: Halberto
Well that\'s your opinion Raz.

I\'m proud of my boys. They rushed Brady pretty well and gave them no running game. The reason I say we weren\'t 100% is because at the areas that caused us to lose, we were missing key players. When Glenn gets back you can expect more points, and Anthony Henry was sorely missed. With him in instead of Reeves (the joke CB of the NFL) tonight could have been completely different.


glenn is the key to that offense. dont mind 2 talented running backs, TO, crayton, and argueably the best TE in the game
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline clips

  • In ChArGe..Ya DiG?!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7807
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: Blackgas7
NFL! Let\'s hear the trash talk!
« Reply #119 on: October 16, 2007, 05:31:11 AM »
I\'m kinda late with this, but oh well...i was kinda expecting dallas to lose this one,..like Hal said, i knew they would put up a good fight, but the pats are just that much more mature and better at this point than dallas....the penalties they were makin\' were ridiculous and against the pats you just can\'t do that, every time dallas got a big play for some yards it would be called back for somebody doin\' somethin extremely stupid.

Meh I think we still could\'ve won that game, but i was kinda shocked how they were just plowin through our "D" with no real effort, it\'s like dallas gave up late in the game,..nothing like how they played to the very last second in buffalo...like i said i don\'t mind them losin to such a stellar team such as the pats, but i would like to see them beat at least some of the top ranked teams out there.
knowledge, wisdom & understanding..these are the basic fundamentals of life

if you can\'t amaze them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh*t....

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk