Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: Devs putting PS3 first !  (Read 4514 times)

Offline Unicron!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9319
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2007, 03:55:35 PM »
They also had separate teams for COD4 and I think DMC4 as well

Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2007, 05:28:47 AM »
Quote from: Viper_Fujax
and what? fuckin ambiguous posts...

one developer uses the ps3 before the 360, now all of a sudden ALL of them are?


how do you know it\'s only one?
has every dev stated their intentions?
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

Offline politiepet
  • ********************
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2607
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2007, 05:59:59 AM »
you\'re right,
since no dev has stated its intentions we\'re gonna have to assume they will put ps3 first from now on :rolleyes:
#RaCeR#:
i hope they all get aids and die they should bnt tbbe having sezx with just anyone they should be in love if theay are foing to have sex not just to make money I htink its wrong for them to just have sexzx for the fun of it specially when some of the performancs are married, its just wrong. tey are givng out deaseases to anyone and its just not right i tell you i think its really really wrong specially when tey have sex i dot whach porno though so im not sure what they do i dont theink theyr realy hjave sex its all just pretendnig but you never no what they do its just wrong speciallly when they dont even love each other its wrong i ell you in tsi just wrong. wtings owting wtrong wtongs wtongs. i dont like it. prlease explaions.

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2007, 10:04:38 AM »
Quote from: mm
how do you know it\'s only one?
has every dev stated their intentions?


you\'re impossible
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2007, 10:06:05 AM »
just as irrational as saying "just one dev" when we don\'t know.

i\'ll vote for the "who cares" agenda.
the games will speak for themselves once released.
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #20 on: December 22, 2007, 10:11:00 AM »
Quote from: mm
just as irrational as saying "just one dev" when we don\'t know.



just about as irrational as saying its more than one dev when we dont know

i said "just one dev" because i was referring to critereon, which is the one dev that i know of..and i was referring to that one dev because that doesn\'t mean the majority is all of a sudden using it.
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #21 on: December 22, 2007, 10:22:57 AM »
nor does it mean they aren\'t.

you have as much evidence as i do.
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

Offline GmanJoe

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #22 on: December 22, 2007, 10:36:48 AM »
Quote from: mm

i\'ll vote for the "who cares" agenda.
the games will speak for themselves once released.


/thread

Can\'t argue with results.
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #23 on: December 22, 2007, 10:43:21 AM »
Quote from: GmanJoe
/thread

Can\'t argue with results.


*tries not to post*

cant...

the results have been even..most games are identical, some games have the ps3 version as better, some games have the 360 as better.

I come up with madden, vegas, assassins, mlb 2k7..you come up with dirt, oblivion, and whatever else.

i dont even see how you can say the results show the ps3 is on top
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline Unicron!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9319
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #24 on: December 22, 2007, 10:51:07 AM »
Who said the PS3 is on top?

Most likely games that are done on the PS3 and ported to the 360 later will look identical. Some rare occasions might look better on the PS3. But that will happen mostly if developers do things that are very very specific to the PS3\'s architecture. I dont see this though as a common thing unless the game wasnt planned to be multiplatform  from the  beginning originally.

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #25 on: December 22, 2007, 10:53:23 AM »
Quote from: Unicron!
Who said the PS3 is on top?


2 ps3 fanboys say the games speak for themselves, what do you think theyre implying?

and if theyre saying future games are going to look better (mind telling me what the lottery numbers are while you\'re at it?), i\'ve been saying from the beginning that the ps3 should become the better system because hopefully dev\'s will be able to use the ps3 correctly, and not spend 5 years like GT and MGS..in the mean time, have fun paying for untouched potential.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2007, 10:57:09 AM by Viper_Fujax »
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline GmanJoe

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #26 on: December 22, 2007, 11:38:35 AM »
Quote from: Viper_Fujax
*tries not to post*

cant...

the results have been even..most games are identical, some games have the ps3 version as better, some games have the 360 as better.

I come up with madden, vegas, assassins, mlb 2k7..you come up with dirt, oblivion, and whatever else.

i dont even see how you can say the results show the ps3 is on top


Never said the PS3 is on top. mm said "the games will speak for themselves...."
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline Unicron!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9319
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #27 on: December 22, 2007, 11:43:32 AM »
Quote from: Viper_Fujax
2 ps3 fanboys say the games speak for themselves, what do you think theyre implying?

and if theyre saying future games are going to look better (mind telling me what the lottery numbers are while you\'re at it?), i\'ve been saying from the beginning that the ps3 should become the better system because hopefully dev\'s will be able to use the ps3 correctly, and not spend 5 years like GT and MGS..in the mean time, have fun paying for untouched potential.
Well I dont know what to make out of it. Personally what I got is that developers are starting to get the hang of it, and they are beginning to make games on the PS3 that look just as good. Ther are a few trade offs on both consoles though. I dont think the PS3 is drastically better than the 360. Some things the 360 does them better, others the PS3.

What untouched potential are you speaking of and what do you mean by "not spend 5 years like GT and MGS" btw? Not trying to attack you there mind you. Just trying to understand better what you are saying.

I think some games are exploiting the console\'s potential or are bound to exploit them. Its just that it is not the multiplatform games that seem to do that (in terms of exploiting very specific characteristics), although some do amazing things on both consoles
« Last Edit: December 22, 2007, 11:45:52 AM by Unicron! »

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #28 on: December 22, 2007, 11:58:26 AM »
Quote from: Unicron!


What untouched potential are you speaking of and what do you mean by "not spend 5 years like GT and MGS" btw? Not trying to attack you there mind you. Just trying to understand better what you are saying.


im just kind of tired of games taking forever to be released, and almost never living up to expectations because in the many years it takes to make that one game, people talk about it for every day, 365 days. And games like MGS are really the only ones using the ps3\'s potential..everything since then can run on the 360 just as well..and no games after MGS in the near future is coming out that is using the ps3 like that.

for me to spend the extra money, ill need more games to not only be like MGS, but for the games to actually be released instead of just hearsay and \'i cant wait\'

if i were these companies, i wouldnt talk about the game 4 years in advance. I\'d say \'yes, its coming out\' and never talk about it until its far in development. maybe a year before the release at most, while expecting some delays
« Last Edit: December 22, 2007, 12:01:09 PM by Viper_Fujax »
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline Raz The Friggin Grea
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Karma: +10/-0
Devs putting PS3 first !
« Reply #29 on: December 22, 2007, 12:25:40 PM »
I personally gurantee that , to the average gamer, MGS 4 will not deliver on the expectations that it has built up. The only people who will love it, are the ones who spent $600 dollars on a system, for a game that was two years away.


And yes, I can say this with certainy. Why? Because no game can live up to the hype that magazines and the web forums give these games now\'a\'days. Konami\'s MGS4 will just be another victim of this.

Quote
me to spend the extra money, ill need more games to not only be like MGS, but for the games to actually be released instead of just hearsay and \'i cant wait\'

Once we hit the $400 mark, the days of buying a system for one game in the future really died for me.  It\'s simply to much money to put up, when I don\'t even have a clue on what the end results will be. I went from someone who lined up for every launch since the Super NES, to someone, who has bought one next generation system so far and waiting to buy the others. I simply cannot justify the price of these consoles , until the games I want are out and I see how they actually deliver.


Quote
f i were these companies, i wouldnt talk about the game 4 years in advance. I\'d say \'yes, its coming out\' and never talk about it until its far in development. maybe a year before the release at most, while expecting some delays


It\'s a catch 22, in one sense. If you don\'t hype your game enough ahead of time, you will get lost in the midst of all these other big titles that are hyped from the time they are simple a "code name title".  The other catch is, if you go ahead and hype it advance, there is a big chance at one point, you\'re going to over hype and you can\'t meet the expectations. Some companies strike a great balance on this, they are few and far bewteen. I think Nintendo is one. You look at titles like Mario Galaxy and the hype was there, but it was never that huge , it was enough to keep the title in mind and when it was released, it met and surpassed what people expected. They are doing the exact same thing with Super Smash Bro\'s.

Companies really have to step up and rethink the marketing. Look at Mass Effect, go ahead and YouTube some E3 builds of it. It is amazing how much that title changed and how much of it was cut on the editing floor. A lot of things were promised and never delivered. Was it still a great game? Sure, but when I look back at what was promised, I can\'t help but feel let down. A feeling that could of been totally avoided, had Bioware kept their game development more closed or simply delivered on what they promised on the first place.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2007, 12:31:24 PM by Raz The Friggin Grea »
My Hi-Def movie collection (much smaller than the SD one).

http://www.dvdspot.com/list.php?member=LivingInClip&list=owned
My Q-Server, Team Fortress 2 stats



 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk