X-Box videogame pic\'s (some powerful system)

Originally posted by PrimalScream
Am I right or am I wrong here?
Please someone, clarify this for me

Correct, you\'re wrong.

Those 250M micro-polygons (or particles) are not actually drawn on the screen, it\'s just the power of the GPU to carry out the calculations. For textured+lit rendered polygons, the performance is 125Mpps.

The EE has the power to perform the calculations for 66Mpps. The PS2\'s GS draws the polygons given to it by the EE, for which the EE+GS combo has the power to render about half that figure for textured+lit polygons.

Then, as with all systems, the performance drops even further when you add gamecode, AI, physics and other graphical features such as bump mapping, lighting, multi-textures etc...

Hope this helps.

hmmm...

I thought those pictures couldn\'t be out of X-Box because PS2 handles ten times better graphics as these ( see any GT3 thread ).

And now it was revealed those to be PC-shots.

Wich pathetic site shows "supposed-to-be-X-Box-shots" without really checking out if they\'re not?

Hmmm... far more I\'m expecting out of X-box. But GC\'s Starfox 3 shots I\'d like to see. Now there\'s a game I\'m interested about... Reminds me of good old Snes times

Still graphics aren\'t the thing that impresses me in a game; it\'s the atmosphere, story and characters. Sadly because of this I\'m not THAT interested about driving-games.

[§ôµÏG®ïñD]

It\'s jagtastic. But if it\'s for pc, Then there will always be updates. But if this ends up looking like that on Xbox. Then all i\'ll do is SIGH.

Yep, those are PC shots! Check out the following from October 2000.

http://pc.ign.com/news/27157.html

Case dismissed!

 
 

ddaryl, go to ign.com, under gamecube, you can find 4 mins long real time rebirth.  There r 2 versions: real time and fmv, i saw them both, damn, the real time looks almost so close to the fmv.

Hey,Why don\'t I look for a PC pic to post as an X-box pic, so I can make fun at X-box and point out that it\'s graphics aren\'t much better(if at all) than PS2\'s. :rolleyes:

Of course, you wouldn\'t post pic from Malice now, would you?

Even if that was an X-box pic, other pic still prove to look much better than any current or planned PS2 games.

Pics like Malice are still far more impressive than any Metal Gear pic you can find. MGS2 is a game coming out in late 2001, and will still LOOK much less impressive next to first gen X-box games.

I think you guys have a problem giving credit where due.

Originally posted by GC-PS2-DC-XB
Hey,Why don\'t I look for a PC pic to post as an X-box pic, so I can make fun at X-box and point out that it\'s graphics aren\'t much better(if at all) than PS2\'s

Well, he said it was from Fgnonline. They didn\'t say it was from the PC version. But of course it would have to run at a dev kit as the final hardware isn\'t there yet (or so they say).