an example...comparison

Originally posted by MeTaL=DeaTh

huh??!! so then are you saying the other screenshot isn\'t good??

no. they both look really good. I just thought you were saying that the Halo shot was bad.

Hey Clyde, I wish I could see your face(?) when E3 rolls through.

A couple of things.

1: Yes, Halo will look better.  They were showing the latest build at the show and, of course, it needed another debug so a lot of the atmospheric effects were missing.  Most importantly the trees the blow in the breeze which are supposed to look amazing.  Did you know the smoke from the gun was actually manipulated by and early version of the breeze in the playable demo?  It was nothing amazing but it was a nice extra.

2: The Zelda demo looks very nice but so does the Raven & Robot demo.  My point?  Both where tech demos so it is hard to bring them into in-game debates.

3: In case someone missed it; the Gotham racer was made in four weeks and two of those with actual dev kits.

my chimp face will have the biggest grin on it, when nintendo shows off all its pokemon games for the "delayed" ncube.

Originally posted by Clyde
my chimp face will have the biggest grin on it, when nintendo shows off all its pokemon games for the "delayed" ncube.

We shall see. I will remember to mark this thread so I can bring it back at the appropriate time.

so yer showing "polished" tech demo pics of an adventure game to compare with VERY early ingame shots of ps2 and xbox shots.

humans never suprise me

Silly chimp. That demo was created in a few days believe it or not, it couldn\'t of been polished.

Also...

MSNBC: Will the look of the games and the polygon counts be as remarkable as they were in the footage?
       Miyamoto: Yes, 100 percent assurance.
       MSNBC: Can you say what kind of polygon levels we will see during games?
       Miyamoto: What we’re running was not at peak level. This was what we can run at a constant rate from beginning to end, not at only one instance like the technical shows you saw with the other game machines.

http://www.msnbc.com/news/460306.asp

BizioEE- get glasses. Everyone here thinks the Zelda pic looks superior graphics wise. There must be something wrong with your vision.

Guys graphics aint everything u know.If i were to choose between ff7 and Ready 2 rumble 2 id choose ff7 simply because i think it has better game play.It\'s like this u guys from what u r saying is u\'d rather have the bouncer if u had the choice between it and chrono chross!just because something has great graphics doesnt mean it will be better than the game with the worst graphis.But...even if GC\'s pokemon series has good gameplay and graphics, well... lets put it this way...it will still suck!

[BizioEE]

Originally posted by BizioEE
Well....the second shot you showed is really better than the first....I have to correct myself...the graphics is better than both X-B0X\'s one and PS2\'s one.....(I\'m not blind Jump-Man)....only a thing...can you give me some URL where I can find the latest info and shots on the GC?  Thanks

...ehi Jump-Man...maybe you didn\'t notice my last reply....

Sorry, I thought you said PS2\'s looks better than both NGC and Xbox.

My mistake.

But...even if GC\'s pokemon series has good gameplay and graphics, well... lets put it this way...it will still suck!

Think about what you just said for a minute.

HALO looks incredible. Though I\'m no tech-head (far from it!), the textures on the soldier/gunner, and the level of distance you can see is remarkable. I do admit that the level of detail presented on Ganon wipes the floor with HALO (awesome shadowing and lightening effects not seem on HALO), but that\'s because everything was focused on the characters in the Zelda demo. If you take a closer look, the background is very depressing; the tiles on the ground are ugly, and the walls aren\'t nearly as beautiful as Ganon and Link. As for the Blood Omen pics... well, IMO, they\'re horrible. You should pick a better pic to represent the PS2\'s graphical prowess, maybe something from MGS2 or ZOE. Now those are some pretty games.

Originally posted by Gohan


no. they both look really good. I just thought you were saying that the Halo shot was bad.

Hey Clyde, I wish I could see your face(?) when E3 rolls through.

nope! i don\'t know how you come to that conclusion,i was just pointing out comparisons of the two games on both systems from the pics,nothing more.

Originally posted by hyper
As for the Blood Omen pics... well, IMO, they\'re horrible. You should pick a better pic to represent the PS2\'s graphical prowess, maybe something from MGS2 or ZOE. Now those are some pretty games.

oh i forgot to please everyone before i posted this topic,next time i\'ll post every single pic for every single game :rolleyes: the topic had nothing to do with which game will play or look better ok,got it?! it was just about graphic comparisons on both systems from what is shown from the pics from a technical standpoint. if you don\'t like Blood Omen,fine i don\'t care...yes the comparison can be done with MGS2 as well,but i was looking for similar shots that showed draw distance,lighting (obviously with characters in them as well) and the like.